Effect of increasing plant protein intake on protein quality and nutrient intake of US adults.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Christopher P F Marinangeli, Kevin Miller, Victor L Fulgoni
{"title":"Effect of increasing plant protein intake on protein quality and nutrient intake of US adults.","authors":"Christopher P F Marinangeli,&nbsp;Kevin Miller,&nbsp;Victor L Fulgoni","doi":"10.1139/apnm-2022-0054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Three cycles of NHANES (2013-2018) were used to assess protein intake, protein quality (protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score; PDCAAS), protein cost, and nutrient intakes across quartiles of plant protein intake (Q1: <28.2%; Q2: 28.2% to <32.1%; Q3: 32.1 to <36.2%; Q4: ≥36.2%) over a 24 h period (≥19 years, <i>n</i> = 14 888). Grains represented the primary source of plant protein across quartiles and increased from 5.01% (Q1) to 13.5% (Q4). Across all the USDA's Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies (FNDDS) food groups, grains were the most economical source of protein (24.3-26 g protein/$1). Legumes were the most economical plant-based protein (28-37.7 g protein/$1) within the \"Protein Foods\" FNDDS group. Absolute protein intake (96.6 g/day) and PDCAAS (0.91) of diets were progressively lower from Q1 to 72.0 g/day and 0.8 in Q4, respectively. Modelling the replacement of 50% of amino acids from grains in the diet with amino acids from legumes increased the PDCAAS by 10% in Q4. Intake levels of fibre, folate, iron, and zinc, were higher in Q2-Q4 compared to Q1 but had lower intakes of vitamins B12 and D. Amino acid complementation is required to effectively integrate higher levels plant protein into US diets.</p>","PeriodicalId":8116,"journal":{"name":"Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2022-0054","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Three cycles of NHANES (2013-2018) were used to assess protein intake, protein quality (protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score; PDCAAS), protein cost, and nutrient intakes across quartiles of plant protein intake (Q1: <28.2%; Q2: 28.2% to <32.1%; Q3: 32.1 to <36.2%; Q4: ≥36.2%) over a 24 h period (≥19 years, n = 14 888). Grains represented the primary source of plant protein across quartiles and increased from 5.01% (Q1) to 13.5% (Q4). Across all the USDA's Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies (FNDDS) food groups, grains were the most economical source of protein (24.3-26 g protein/$1). Legumes were the most economical plant-based protein (28-37.7 g protein/$1) within the "Protein Foods" FNDDS group. Absolute protein intake (96.6 g/day) and PDCAAS (0.91) of diets were progressively lower from Q1 to 72.0 g/day and 0.8 in Q4, respectively. Modelling the replacement of 50% of amino acids from grains in the diet with amino acids from legumes increased the PDCAAS by 10% in Q4. Intake levels of fibre, folate, iron, and zinc, were higher in Q2-Q4 compared to Q1 but had lower intakes of vitamins B12 and D. Amino acid complementation is required to effectively integrate higher levels plant protein into US diets.

增加植物蛋白摄入量对美国成人蛋白质品质和营养素摄入量的影响。
采用NHANES(2013-2018)三个周期评估蛋白质摄入量、蛋白质质量(蛋白质消化率校正氨基酸评分;PDCAAS)、蛋白质成本和植物蛋白质摄入四分位数的营养摄入量(Q1: n = 14 888)。谷物是植物蛋白质的主要来源,从5.01% (Q1)增加到13.5% (Q4)。在美国农业部膳食研究食品和营养数据库(FNDDS)的所有食物组中,谷物是最经济的蛋白质来源(24.3-26克蛋白质/ 1美元)。豆类是“蛋白质食品”FNDDS组中最经济的植物性蛋白质(28-37.7 g蛋白质/ 1美元)。饲粮的绝对蛋白质摄入量(96.6 g/d)和PDCAAS(0.91)分别在第一季度和第四季度逐渐降低至72.0 g/d和0.8 g/d。在第4季度,用豆类氨基酸代替饲粮中50%的谷物氨基酸使PDCAAS提高了10%。与第一季度相比,第二季度至第四季度纤维、叶酸、铁和锌的摄入量较高,但维生素B12和d的摄入量较低。氨基酸补充是有效地将较高水平的植物蛋白整合到美国饮食中的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
113
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism publishes original research articles, reviews, and commentaries, focussing on the application of physiology, nutrition, and metabolism to the study of human health, physical activity, and fitness. The published research, reviews, and symposia will be of interest to exercise physiologists, physical fitness and exercise rehabilitation specialists, public health and health care professionals, as well as basic and applied physiologists, nutritionists, and biochemists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信