Defining Malaysia's health research ethics system through a stakeholder driven approach

Pub Date : 2023-03-02 DOI:10.1111/dewb.12396
Sean Tackett, Chirk Jenn Ng, Jeremy Sugarman, Esther Gnanamalar Sarojini Daniel, Nishakanthi Gopalan, Tivyashinee Tivyashinee, Adeeba Kamarulzaman, Joseph Ali
{"title":"Defining Malaysia's health research ethics system through a stakeholder driven approach","authors":"Sean Tackett,&nbsp;Chirk Jenn Ng,&nbsp;Jeremy Sugarman,&nbsp;Esther Gnanamalar Sarojini Daniel,&nbsp;Nishakanthi Gopalan,&nbsp;Tivyashinee Tivyashinee,&nbsp;Adeeba Kamarulzaman,&nbsp;Joseph Ali","doi":"10.1111/dewb.12396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The need to understand the systems that support ethical health research has long been recognized, but there are limited descriptions of actual health research ethics (HRE) systems. Using participatory network mapping methods, we empirically defined Malaysia's HRE system. 13 Malaysian stakeholders identified 4 overarching and 25 specific HRE system functions and 35 actors internal and 3 external to the Malaysian HRE system responsible for those functions. Functions requiring the most attention were: advising on legislation related to HRE; optimizing research value to society; and defining standards for HRE oversight. Internal actors with the greatest potential for more influence were: the national network of research ethics committees; non-institution-based research ethics committees; and research participants. The World Health Organization, an external actor, had the largest untapped potential for influence overall. In summary, this stakeholder-driven process identified HRE system functions and actors that could be targeted to increase HRE system capacity.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10474241/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dewb.12396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The need to understand the systems that support ethical health research has long been recognized, but there are limited descriptions of actual health research ethics (HRE) systems. Using participatory network mapping methods, we empirically defined Malaysia's HRE system. 13 Malaysian stakeholders identified 4 overarching and 25 specific HRE system functions and 35 actors internal and 3 external to the Malaysian HRE system responsible for those functions. Functions requiring the most attention were: advising on legislation related to HRE; optimizing research value to society; and defining standards for HRE oversight. Internal actors with the greatest potential for more influence were: the national network of research ethics committees; non-institution-based research ethics committees; and research participants. The World Health Organization, an external actor, had the largest untapped potential for influence overall. In summary, this stakeholder-driven process identified HRE system functions and actors that could be targeted to increase HRE system capacity.

分享
查看原文
通过利益相关者驱动法确定马来西亚的卫生研究伦理系统。
长期以来,人们一直认为有必要了解支持健康研究伦理的系统,但对实际健康研究伦理(HRE)系统的描述却很有限。利用参与式网络制图方法,我们对马来西亚的健康研究伦理体系进行了实证定义。13 名马来西亚利益相关者确定了 4 项总体和 25 项具体的 HRE 系统功能,以及负责这些功能的 35 名内部参与者和 3 名外部参与者。最需要关注的职能是:就与人 力资源教育有关的立法提供咨询意见;优化研究对社会的价值;以及确定人力资源教育 监督标准。最有可能发挥更大影响力的内部行为者是:国家研究伦理委员会网络;非机构研究伦理委员会;以及研究参与者。世界卫生组织作为外部行为者,具有最大的未开发影响潜力。总之,由利益相关者推动的这一进程确定了人权教育系统的功能以及可作为提高人 权教育系统能力目标的参与者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信