Rituximab Monotherapy versus Rituximab and Bortezomib Combination Therapy for Treatment of Non-paraneoplastic Autoimmune Retinopathy.

IF 1.6 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Arash Maleki, Amanda Colombo, Sydney Look-Why, B A Peter Y Chang, Stephen D Anesi, Stephen D Anesi
{"title":"Rituximab Monotherapy versus Rituximab and Bortezomib Combination Therapy for Treatment of Non-paraneoplastic Autoimmune Retinopathy.","authors":"Arash Maleki,&nbsp;Amanda Colombo,&nbsp;Sydney Look-Why,&nbsp;B A Peter Y Chang,&nbsp;Stephen D Anesi,&nbsp;Stephen D Anesi","doi":"10.18502/jovr.v17i4.12304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To study whether rituximab and bortezomib combination therapy is more effective than rituximab monotherapy in the treatment of non-paraneoplastic autoimmune retinopathy (npAIR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective case series involving six patients with npAIR, taking either rituximab and bortezomib combination therapy (three cases) or rituximab monotherapy (one case and two historical patients).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients on both treatment regimens showed stability in most of the visual function parameters during the one year of follow-up. Combination therapy resulted in improvement of scotopic combined rod and cone a-wave and b-wave amplitudes in all eyes where they were available (four eyes); however, rituximab monotherapy resulted in only two eyes with stable scotopic combined rod and cone a-wave and b-wave amplitudes, while four eyes showed a decrease in both a- and b-wave amplitudes. The average improvement in b-wave amplitude (50.7% <math><mo>±</mo></math> 29.4% [range, 25-90%]) was higher than the average improvement in a-wave amplitude (35.7% <math><mo>±</mo></math> 9.74 [range, 25-63%]). No severe adverse effects were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rituximab and bortezomib combination therapy may not be more effective than rituximab monotherapy in npAIR patients for most of the visual function parameters; however, this combination therapy may be more effective in improving scotopic combined rod and cone a- and b-wave amplitudes. This may indicate the higher efficacy of combination therapy when there is involvement of the inner retina.</p>","PeriodicalId":16586,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research","volume":"17 4","pages":"515-528"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9806323/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v17i4.12304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: To study whether rituximab and bortezomib combination therapy is more effective than rituximab monotherapy in the treatment of non-paraneoplastic autoimmune retinopathy (npAIR).

Methods: Retrospective case series involving six patients with npAIR, taking either rituximab and bortezomib combination therapy (three cases) or rituximab monotherapy (one case and two historical patients).

Results: Patients on both treatment regimens showed stability in most of the visual function parameters during the one year of follow-up. Combination therapy resulted in improvement of scotopic combined rod and cone a-wave and b-wave amplitudes in all eyes where they were available (four eyes); however, rituximab monotherapy resulted in only two eyes with stable scotopic combined rod and cone a-wave and b-wave amplitudes, while four eyes showed a decrease in both a- and b-wave amplitudes. The average improvement in b-wave amplitude (50.7% ± 29.4% [range, 25-90%]) was higher than the average improvement in a-wave amplitude (35.7% ± 9.74 [range, 25-63%]). No severe adverse effects were reported.

Conclusion: Rituximab and bortezomib combination therapy may not be more effective than rituximab monotherapy in npAIR patients for most of the visual function parameters; however, this combination therapy may be more effective in improving scotopic combined rod and cone a- and b-wave amplitudes. This may indicate the higher efficacy of combination therapy when there is involvement of the inner retina.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

利妥昔单抗与利妥昔单抗和硼替佐米联合治疗非副肿瘤自身免疫性视网膜病变的比较
目的:研究利妥昔单抗与硼替佐米联合治疗非副肿瘤自身免疫性视网膜病变(npAIR)是否比利妥昔单抗更有效。方法:回顾性分析6例npAIR患者,采用利妥昔单抗联合硼替佐米治疗(3例)或利妥昔单抗治疗(1例,2例既往患者)。结果:在一年的随访中,两种治疗方案的患者在大多数视觉功能参数上都表现出稳定性。联合治疗可改善所有眼(4只眼)的杆状和锥状联合a波和b波振幅;然而,利妥昔单抗单药治疗仅导致2只眼的a波和b波波幅稳定,而4只眼的a波和b波波幅均下降。b波振幅的平均改善(50.7%±29.4%[范围,25-90%])高于a波振幅的平均改善(35.7%±9.74[范围,25-63%])。没有严重的不良反应报告。结论:利妥昔单抗与硼替佐米联合治疗对npAIR患者的大多数视功能参数可能并不比利妥昔单抗更有效;然而,这种联合治疗可能更有效地改善暗斑联合杆状和锥状a波和b波振幅。这可能表明,当视网膜内受累时,联合治疗的疗效更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信