Healing large Traumatic Tympanic Membrane Perforations Using Vaseline Gauze and Gelfoam Patching Alone.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Ent-Ear Nose & Throat Journal Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-09 DOI:10.1177/01455613221150571
Huiqin Zong, Zhengcai Lou
{"title":"Healing large Traumatic Tympanic Membrane Perforations Using Vaseline Gauze and Gelfoam Patching Alone.","authors":"Huiqin Zong, Zhengcai Lou","doi":"10.1177/01455613221150571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of vaseline gauze (VG) patching on the treatment of large traumatic perforation of tympanic membrane (TM).Material and methods90 patients with traumatic perforation larger than 25% of the TM were randomly allocated into the control group of observation only, VG group, and Gelfoam patch alone group. The closure rate and closure time among the 3 groups were compared at 3 months.ResultsIn total, 82 large traumatic perforations were analyzed in this study. The closure rates in the control, VG, and gelfoam patch groups were 84.6%, 100.0%, and 89.3%, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.637). Post-hoc multiple comparisons showed that the difference between the control and VG groups was significant (<i>P</i> = 0.047), but the difference wasn't significant between gelfoam alone and control groups (<i>P</i> = 0.699) or VG groups (<i>P</i> = 0.236). The mean closure times were 5.41 ± 1.47, 2.14 ± 0.93, and 3.00 ± 0.62 weeks for the control, VG, and gelfoam patch groups, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Post-hoc multiple comparisons showed that the difference was significant between the control and VG groups (<i>P</i> < 0.001) or gelfoam alone group (<i>P</i> < 0.001) or VG and gelfoam groups (<i>P</i> < 0.05).ConclusionsVG improved the closure rate and shortened the closure time compared with observation only, which could be an effective patch material for repairing traumatic lager perforations in the outpatient setting, which is readily available and convenient.</p>","PeriodicalId":51041,"journal":{"name":"Ent-Ear Nose & Throat Journal","volume":" ","pages":"NP699-NP705"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ent-Ear Nose & Throat Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613221150571","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of vaseline gauze (VG) patching on the treatment of large traumatic perforation of tympanic membrane (TM).Material and methods90 patients with traumatic perforation larger than 25% of the TM were randomly allocated into the control group of observation only, VG group, and Gelfoam patch alone group. The closure rate and closure time among the 3 groups were compared at 3 months.ResultsIn total, 82 large traumatic perforations were analyzed in this study. The closure rates in the control, VG, and gelfoam patch groups were 84.6%, 100.0%, and 89.3%, respectively (P = 0.637). Post-hoc multiple comparisons showed that the difference between the control and VG groups was significant (P = 0.047), but the difference wasn't significant between gelfoam alone and control groups (P = 0.699) or VG groups (P = 0.236). The mean closure times were 5.41 ± 1.47, 2.14 ± 0.93, and 3.00 ± 0.62 weeks for the control, VG, and gelfoam patch groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Post-hoc multiple comparisons showed that the difference was significant between the control and VG groups (P < 0.001) or gelfoam alone group (P < 0.001) or VG and gelfoam groups (P < 0.05).ConclusionsVG improved the closure rate and shortened the closure time compared with observation only, which could be an effective patch material for repairing traumatic lager perforations in the outpatient setting, which is readily available and convenient.

仅使用凡士林纱布和气泡棉修补剂治愈大面积外伤性鼓膜穿孔。
研究目的材料与方法:将 90 例鼓膜穿孔面积大于 25% 的外伤性鼓膜穿孔患者随机分为仅观察的对照组、凡士林纱布(VG)贴敷组和单独使用 Gelfoam 贴敷组。比较 3 组 3 个月后的闭合率和闭合时间:结果:本研究共分析了 82 例大面积创伤性穿孔。对照组、VG 组和胶棉贴片组的闭合率分别为 84.6%、100.0% 和 89.3%(P = 0.637)。事后多重比较显示,对照组和 VG 组之间的差异显著(P = 0.047),但单独使用海泡石与对照组(P = 0.699)或 VG 组(P = 0.236)之间的差异并不显著。对照组、VG 组和软胶贴片组的平均闭合时间分别为 5.41 ± 1.47 周、2.14 ± 0.93 周和 3.00 ± 0.62 周(P < 0.001)。事后多重比较显示,对照组和 VG 组(P < 0.001)或单独使用海棉组(P < 0.001)或 VG 和海棉组(P < 0.05)之间差异显著:结论:与单纯观察组相比,VG提高了闭合率,缩短了闭合时间,可作为门诊修复创伤性胃大部穿孔的有效补片材料,且易于获得,使用方便。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ent-Ear Nose & Throat Journal
Ent-Ear Nose & Throat Journal 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
385
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ear, Nose & Throat Journal provides practical, peer-reviewed original clinical articles, highlighting scientific research relevant to clinical care, and case reports that describe unusual entities or innovative approaches to treatment and case management. ENT Journal utilizes multiple channels to deliver authoritative and timely content that informs, engages, and shapes the industry now and into the future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信