Impact of a multidisciplinary nutritional support team on quality improvement for patients receiving home parenteral nutrition.

IF 3.3 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Michael Rothkopf, Mohan Pant, Rebecca Brown, Jaimie Haselhorst, Francine Gagliardotto, Allison Tallman, Debbie Stevenson, Andrew DePalma, Michael Saracco, Dan Rosenberg, Vladimir Proudan, Kishwar Shareef, Nudrat Ayub
{"title":"Impact of a multidisciplinary nutritional support team on quality improvement for patients receiving home parenteral nutrition.","authors":"Michael Rothkopf,&nbsp;Mohan Pant,&nbsp;Rebecca Brown,&nbsp;Jaimie Haselhorst,&nbsp;Francine Gagliardotto,&nbsp;Allison Tallman,&nbsp;Debbie Stevenson,&nbsp;Andrew DePalma,&nbsp;Michael Saracco,&nbsp;Dan Rosenberg,&nbsp;Vladimir Proudan,&nbsp;Kishwar Shareef,&nbsp;Nudrat Ayub","doi":"10.1136/bmjnph-2022-000484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Home parenteral nutrition (HPN) is essential for patients with intestinal failure requiring long-term nutritional support. The Amerita Quality Improvement Project for HPN Patients (QIP-PN) explored the effect of a physician nutrition expert (PNE)-led multidisciplinary nutritional support team (MNST) on HPN care for patients under its service.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine an MNST effect on adherence to protocols, outcomes and quality of life (QOL) in HPN.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was divided into three phases: data review (phases 1a and 1b), observation (phase 2) and intervention (phase 3). Seven Amerita locations were selected as 'study branches' (population), from which all study patients and controls were drawn. The quality improvement project employed a quasi-experimental case-matched control group (control) design. Data were collected on demographics, treating physicians PNE status, HPN care variables, recommended interventions, quality-of-life assessment, adverse outcomes and hospitalisations. Paired t-test compared continuous data between phases 2 and 3. Comparisons between study and control groups used a negative binomial regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-four patients were reviewed in phase 1a and 197 in phase 1b. Forty study patients completed phase 2 and progressed into phase 3, of whom 30 completed ≥60 therapy days. Patients were lost to follow-up if they discontinued HPN for any reason. Improvements in weight, body mass index and QOL were seen in the study patients during intervention. Recommendations made and accepted by treating physicians differed based on PNE status. Study patients had fewer adverse outcomes and related hospitalisations than controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MNST recommendations improved clinical, biochemical parameters and patients' self-reported overall health. MNST input reduced adverse outcomes, hospitalisation and the length of stay at the hospital. This study highlights the potential for MNST to have a significant impact on the quality and overall cost of HPN management.</p>","PeriodicalId":36307,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/94/01/bmjnph-2022-000484.PMC9813622.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjnph-2022-000484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Home parenteral nutrition (HPN) is essential for patients with intestinal failure requiring long-term nutritional support. The Amerita Quality Improvement Project for HPN Patients (QIP-PN) explored the effect of a physician nutrition expert (PNE)-led multidisciplinary nutritional support team (MNST) on HPN care for patients under its service.

Objective: To determine an MNST effect on adherence to protocols, outcomes and quality of life (QOL) in HPN.

Methods: The study was divided into three phases: data review (phases 1a and 1b), observation (phase 2) and intervention (phase 3). Seven Amerita locations were selected as 'study branches' (population), from which all study patients and controls were drawn. The quality improvement project employed a quasi-experimental case-matched control group (control) design. Data were collected on demographics, treating physicians PNE status, HPN care variables, recommended interventions, quality-of-life assessment, adverse outcomes and hospitalisations. Paired t-test compared continuous data between phases 2 and 3. Comparisons between study and control groups used a negative binomial regression model.

Results: Thirty-four patients were reviewed in phase 1a and 197 in phase 1b. Forty study patients completed phase 2 and progressed into phase 3, of whom 30 completed ≥60 therapy days. Patients were lost to follow-up if they discontinued HPN for any reason. Improvements in weight, body mass index and QOL were seen in the study patients during intervention. Recommendations made and accepted by treating physicians differed based on PNE status. Study patients had fewer adverse outcomes and related hospitalisations than controls.

Conclusion: MNST recommendations improved clinical, biochemical parameters and patients' self-reported overall health. MNST input reduced adverse outcomes, hospitalisation and the length of stay at the hospital. This study highlights the potential for MNST to have a significant impact on the quality and overall cost of HPN management.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

多学科营养支持团队对提高患者接受家庭肠外营养质量的影响。
家庭肠外营养(HPN)对需要长期营养支持的肠衰竭患者至关重要。Amerita HPN患者质量改善项目(QIP-PN)探讨了由医师营养专家(PNE)领导的多学科营养支持团队(MNST)对其服务下患者HPN护理的影响。目的:确定MNST对HPN患者依从性、预后和生活质量(QOL)的影响。方法:研究分为三个阶段:资料回顾(1a和1b阶段)、观察(2阶段)和干预(3阶段)。选择7个Amerita地点作为“研究分支”(人群),从中抽取所有研究患者和对照组。质量改进项目采用准实验病例匹配对照组(对照)设计。收集的数据包括人口统计学、治疗医生PNE状态、HPN护理变量、推荐干预措施、生活质量评估、不良后果和住院情况。配对t检验比较了第二阶段和第三阶段的连续数据。实验组和对照组之间的比较采用负二项回归模型。结果:34例患者在1a期,197例患者在1b期。40例研究患者完成2期并进入3期,其中30例完成≥60天的治疗。如果患者因任何原因停用HPN,则失去随访机会。在干预期间,研究患者的体重、体重指数和生活质量均有所改善。治疗医生根据PNE状态提出和接受的建议有所不同。与对照组相比,研究患者的不良后果和相关住院治疗较少。结论:MNST建议改善了临床、生化参数和患者自我报告的整体健康状况。MNST的投入减少了不良后果、住院率和住院时间。这项研究强调了MNST对HPN管理的质量和总体成本有重大影响的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health Nursing-Nutrition and Dietetics
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信