Perceived Relative Deprivation Across the Adult Lifespan: An Examination of Aging and Cohort Effects.

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Kieren J Lilly, Chris G Sibley, Danny Osborne
{"title":"Perceived Relative Deprivation Across the Adult Lifespan: An Examination of Aging and Cohort Effects.","authors":"Kieren J Lilly, Chris G Sibley, Danny Osborne","doi":"10.1177/01461672231195332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite being a core psychological construct for over 70 years, research has yet to examine how perceptions of deprivation relative to other individuals and/or groups <i>develop</i> across adulthood. As such, this preregistered study uses cohort-sequential latent growth modeling to examine changes in individual- and group-based relative deprivation (IRD and GRD, respectively) across the adult lifespan. Across 10 annual assessments of a nationwide random sample of adults (<i>N</i><sub>total</sub> = 58,878; ethnic minority <i>n</i> = 11,927; 62.7% women; ages 21-80), mean levels of IRD trended downward across the lifespan, whereas mean levels of GRD generally <i>increased</i> from young-to-middle adulthood before declining across late adulthood. Subtle cohort effects emerged for both constructs, although both IRD and GRD largely followed a normative aging process. Critically, the development of GRD-but not IRD-differed between ethnic groups, providing insights into how one's <i>objective</i> status may shape <i>subjective</i> (dis)advantage over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":19834,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":"554-572"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11827282/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672231195332","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite being a core psychological construct for over 70 years, research has yet to examine how perceptions of deprivation relative to other individuals and/or groups develop across adulthood. As such, this preregistered study uses cohort-sequential latent growth modeling to examine changes in individual- and group-based relative deprivation (IRD and GRD, respectively) across the adult lifespan. Across 10 annual assessments of a nationwide random sample of adults (Ntotal = 58,878; ethnic minority n = 11,927; 62.7% women; ages 21-80), mean levels of IRD trended downward across the lifespan, whereas mean levels of GRD generally increased from young-to-middle adulthood before declining across late adulthood. Subtle cohort effects emerged for both constructs, although both IRD and GRD largely followed a normative aging process. Critically, the development of GRD-but not IRD-differed between ethnic groups, providing insights into how one's objective status may shape subjective (dis)advantage over time.

成年人一生中感知到的相对匮乏:对老龄化和队列效应的研究。
尽管相对于其他个体和/或群体的匮乏感作为一种核心心理结构已有 70 多年的历史,但研究人员尚未考察这种匮乏感在整个成年期是如何发展的。因此,这项预先注册的研究采用了队列-序列潜伏增长模型来考察成人生命周期中基于个体和群体的相对剥夺感(分别为 IRD 和 GRD)的变化。通过对全国范围内随机抽样的成年人(总人数=58878;少数民族人数=11927;62.7%为女性;年龄在21-80岁之间)进行10次年度评估,IRD的平均水平在整个生命周期内呈下降趋势,而GRD的平均水平在整个成年晚期下降之前,从青年到成年中期普遍上升。虽然 IRD 和 GRD 在很大程度上都遵循了正常的衰老过程,但这两种结构都出现了微妙的队列效应。重要的是,GRD(而非 IRD)的发展在不同种族群体之间存在差异,这为我们深入了解一个人的客观地位如何随着时间的推移影响主观(不)优势提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: The Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin is the official journal for the Society of Personality and Social Psychology. The journal is an international outlet for original empirical papers in all areas of personality and social psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信