Understanding the experience of rumination and worry: A descriptive qualitative survey study

IF 3.8 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Amy E. Joubert, Michelle L. Moulds, Aliza Werner-Seidler, Maria Sharrock, Bojana Popovic, Jill M. Newby
{"title":"Understanding the experience of rumination and worry: A descriptive qualitative survey study","authors":"Amy E. Joubert,&nbsp;Michelle L. Moulds,&nbsp;Aliza Werner-Seidler,&nbsp;Maria Sharrock,&nbsp;Bojana Popovic,&nbsp;Jill M. Newby","doi":"10.1111/bjc.12367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Rumination and worry have been implicated in the onset, severity, maintenance and relapse risk of depression and anxiety disorders. Despite this, little research has examined individuals' personal experiences of these processes. This study investigates how individuals experience these processes, which will provide insight into these common features of mental disorders and inform the development of an online intervention specifically targeting rumination and worry.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>An online qualitative survey was conducted to gain insight into people's personal definitions, experiences with and understandings of rumination and worry.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Participants answered open- and close-ended questions about their personal understanding of rumination and worry, typical thought content, triggers, frequency, duration and coping strategies. Participant responses were coded into themes. Participants also completed self-report questionnaires of depression, anxiety and stress and repetitive negative thinking.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Two hundred and seven adults completed the online survey (76% female; mean age = 28.2 years, range = 17–71), 51% of whom reported previously experiencing depression and anxiety. All participants were familiar with the concept of worry, whereas 28% of participants indicated they had never heard of rumination. Participants reported most commonly ruminating and/or worrying about personal relationships, past mistakes, negative experiences and conversations/social interactions. The most commonly reported triggers for rumination and/or worry were social situations/interpersonal interactions (25%) and negative events/experiences (24%). Distraction was the most common coping strategy (48%); however, 21% reported being unable to stop themselves from ruminating and/or worrying.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The results provide a unique insight into the personal experiences and understandings of rumination and worry of potential end users of treatment programs targeting these processes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48211,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":"61 4","pages":"929-946"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/54/8f/BJC-61-929.PMC9790473.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjc.12367","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objectives

Rumination and worry have been implicated in the onset, severity, maintenance and relapse risk of depression and anxiety disorders. Despite this, little research has examined individuals' personal experiences of these processes. This study investigates how individuals experience these processes, which will provide insight into these common features of mental disorders and inform the development of an online intervention specifically targeting rumination and worry.

Design

An online qualitative survey was conducted to gain insight into people's personal definitions, experiences with and understandings of rumination and worry.

Methods

Participants answered open- and close-ended questions about their personal understanding of rumination and worry, typical thought content, triggers, frequency, duration and coping strategies. Participant responses were coded into themes. Participants also completed self-report questionnaires of depression, anxiety and stress and repetitive negative thinking.

Results

Two hundred and seven adults completed the online survey (76% female; mean age = 28.2 years, range = 17–71), 51% of whom reported previously experiencing depression and anxiety. All participants were familiar with the concept of worry, whereas 28% of participants indicated they had never heard of rumination. Participants reported most commonly ruminating and/or worrying about personal relationships, past mistakes, negative experiences and conversations/social interactions. The most commonly reported triggers for rumination and/or worry were social situations/interpersonal interactions (25%) and negative events/experiences (24%). Distraction was the most common coping strategy (48%); however, 21% reported being unable to stop themselves from ruminating and/or worrying.

Conclusions

The results provide a unique insight into the personal experiences and understandings of rumination and worry of potential end users of treatment programs targeting these processes.

了解反刍与忧虑的经验:一项描述性质的调查研究
目的反刍和担忧与抑郁和焦虑障碍的发病、严重程度、维持和复发风险有关。尽管如此,很少有研究考察个人在这些过程中的个人经历。这项研究调查了个体如何经历这些过程,这将为精神障碍的这些共同特征提供见解,并为专门针对反刍和担忧的在线干预的发展提供信息。设计通过一项在线定性调查,深入了解人们对反刍和忧虑的个人定义、经历和理解。方法被试分别回答开放性和封闭性问题,包括个人对反刍和忧虑的理解、典型的思考内容、触发因素、频率、持续时间和应对策略。参与者的回答被编码成主题。参与者还完成了关于抑郁、焦虑、压力和反复消极思维的自我报告问卷。结果207名成年人完成了在线调查(76%为女性;平均年龄= 28.2岁,范围= 17-71岁),其中51%的人报告以前经历过抑郁和焦虑。所有的参与者都熟悉担忧的概念,而28%的参与者表示他们从未听说过反刍。参与者最常对人际关系、过去的错误、负面经历和对话/社交互动进行反思和/或担忧。最常见的引发沉思和/或担忧的因素是社交场合/人际交往(25%)和负面事件/经历(24%)。分散注意力是最常见的应对策略(48%);然而,21%的人表示无法阻止自己反复思考和/或担忧。结论该研究结果提供了一个独特的见解,以了解针对这些过程的治疗方案的潜在最终用户的个人经验和对反刍和担忧的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.20%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Clinical Psychology publishes original research, both empirical and theoretical, on all aspects of clinical psychology: - clinical and abnormal psychology featuring descriptive or experimental studies - aetiology, assessment and treatment of the whole range of psychological disorders irrespective of age group and setting - biological influences on individual behaviour - studies of psychological interventions and treatment on individuals, dyads, families and groups
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信