Tumor Microenvironment Prognostic Risk and Its Association With MUC5AC in Ampullary Carcinoma.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Sun-Young Jun, Eui-Jin Lee, Sang-Il Kim, Soyeon An
{"title":"Tumor Microenvironment Prognostic Risk and Its Association With MUC5AC in Ampullary Carcinoma.","authors":"Sun-Young Jun,&nbsp;Eui-Jin Lee,&nbsp;Sang-Il Kim,&nbsp;Soyeon An","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2022-0131-OA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>The tumor-host interaction in the tumor microenvironment (TME) affects the prognosis of patients with malignant tumors. TME assessed via tumor budding (BD) and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) had a prognostic impact in patients with nonampullary small intestinal and colorectal carcinomas. In ampullary carcinoma (AC), MUC5AC was recently revealed as a significant prognosticator, but studies about the TME have not been conducted.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To assess TME-based prognostic risk in AC.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>We generated a collective TME risk index based on high-grade BD at the invasive front (BD3) and high density of stromal-TIL (>5%) in 64 surgically resected ACs. We evaluated its predictive values for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). We also investigated the relationship of TME to MUC5AC expression.</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>TME prognostic risk index was classified into low-risk (BDLow/TILHigh; 26 of 64; 41%), intermediate-risk (BDLow/TILLow or BDHigh/TILHigh; 23; 36%), and high-risk (BDHigh/TILLow; 15; 23%) groups. Higher TME prognostic risk was associated with higher tumor grade (P = .03), lymphovascular invasion (P = .05), and MUC5AC immunopositivity (P = .02). TME prognostic risk index displayed better predictive ability for both OS (53.9 versus 46.1 versus 42.2) and RFS (24.8 versus 16.9 versus 15.3) than BD or TIL alone. In multivariate analysis, TME prognostic risk index was an independent prognosticator for OS (P = .003) and RFS (P = .03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>TME risk index in combination with BD and TIL was a stronger predictor of prognostic risk stratification than either BD or TIL alone for both OS and RFS in patients with AC. MUC5AC may modulate the interaction between tumor cells and immunity toward enhancing invasiveness in TME.</p>","PeriodicalId":8305,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":"147 9","pages":"1060-1074"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2022-0131-OA","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context.—: The tumor-host interaction in the tumor microenvironment (TME) affects the prognosis of patients with malignant tumors. TME assessed via tumor budding (BD) and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) had a prognostic impact in patients with nonampullary small intestinal and colorectal carcinomas. In ampullary carcinoma (AC), MUC5AC was recently revealed as a significant prognosticator, but studies about the TME have not been conducted.

Objective.—: To assess TME-based prognostic risk in AC.

Design.—: We generated a collective TME risk index based on high-grade BD at the invasive front (BD3) and high density of stromal-TIL (>5%) in 64 surgically resected ACs. We evaluated its predictive values for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). We also investigated the relationship of TME to MUC5AC expression.

Results.—: TME prognostic risk index was classified into low-risk (BDLow/TILHigh; 26 of 64; 41%), intermediate-risk (BDLow/TILLow or BDHigh/TILHigh; 23; 36%), and high-risk (BDHigh/TILLow; 15; 23%) groups. Higher TME prognostic risk was associated with higher tumor grade (P = .03), lymphovascular invasion (P = .05), and MUC5AC immunopositivity (P = .02). TME prognostic risk index displayed better predictive ability for both OS (53.9 versus 46.1 versus 42.2) and RFS (24.8 versus 16.9 versus 15.3) than BD or TIL alone. In multivariate analysis, TME prognostic risk index was an independent prognosticator for OS (P = .003) and RFS (P = .03).

Conclusions.—: TME risk index in combination with BD and TIL was a stronger predictor of prognostic risk stratification than either BD or TIL alone for both OS and RFS in patients with AC. MUC5AC may modulate the interaction between tumor cells and immunity toward enhancing invasiveness in TME.

壶腹癌肿瘤微环境预后风险及其与MUC5AC的关系
上下文。-:肿瘤微环境中肿瘤-宿主相互作用(tumor-host interaction, TME)影响恶性肿瘤患者的预后。通过肿瘤出芽(BD)和肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞(TIL)评估TME对非壶腹性小肠和结直肠癌患者的预后有影响。在壶腹癌(AC)中,MUC5AC最近被发现是一个重要的预后指标,但关于TME的研究尚未开展。-:评估ac设计中基于tme的预后风险。-:我们基于64例手术切除的癌前浸润性高级别BD (BD3)和间质til高密度(>5%)生成了TME风险指数。我们评估了其对总生存期(OS)和无复发生存期(RFS)的预测价值。我们还研究了TME与MUC5AC表达的关系。-: TME预后风险指数分为低危(BDLow/TILHigh;64人中有26人;41%),中等风险(BDLow/TILLow或BDHigh/TILHigh;23;36%)和高风险(BDHigh/TILLow;15;23%)组。较高的TME预后风险与较高的肿瘤分级(P = .03)、淋巴血管侵犯(P = .05)和MUC5AC免疫阳性(P = .02)相关。TME预后风险指数对OS (53.9 vs 46.1 vs 42.2)和RFS (24.8 vs 16.9 vs 15.3)的预测能力均优于单独使用BD或TIL。在多因素分析中,TME预后风险指数是OS (P = 0.003)和RFS (P = 0.03)的独立预测因子。-:对于AC患者的OS和RFS, TME风险指数联合BD和TIL比单独BD或TIL更能预测预后风险分层。MUC5AC可能调节肿瘤细胞与免疫之间的相互作用,从而增强TME的侵袭性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Welcome to the website of the Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine (APLM). This monthly, peer-reviewed journal of the College of American Pathologists offers global reach and highest measured readership among pathology journals. Published since 1926, ARCHIVES was voted in 2009 the only pathology journal among the top 100 most influential journals of the past 100 years by the BioMedical and Life Sciences Division of the Special Libraries Association. Online access to the full-text and PDF files of APLM articles is free.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信