Assessing the Effectiveness of a Primary Care Provider Office-Based Intervention for Increasing Organ Donor Registration Rates in Two New York State Counties.
Michael McCabe, M Katherine Dokus, Nancy J Ryan, Hangchuan Shi, Amy James, Michael E Meadow, James G Dolan, Peter Veazie, Stephen Judge, Mark Orloff, Scott McIntosh, Randeep Kashyap
{"title":"Assessing the Effectiveness of a Primary Care Provider Office-Based Intervention for Increasing Organ Donor Registration Rates in Two New York State Counties.","authors":"Michael McCabe, M Katherine Dokus, Nancy J Ryan, Hangchuan Shi, Amy James, Michael E Meadow, James G Dolan, Peter Veazie, Stephen Judge, Mark Orloff, Scott McIntosh, Randeep Kashyap","doi":"10.1177/15269248221122885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Despite strong public support, organ donor registration rates (RR) continue to lag while need only grows. In the United States, the traditional registration site is the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), however Primary care provider (PCP) offices have been considered as alternate locations for increasing RR. <b>Methods:</b> Twelve PCP offices across 2 New York Counties were subjected to a control week where participants received only a registration opportunity and an intervention week with the addition of a motivational poster and informational brochure. Zip code level sociodemographic data were obtained for each site. RR from the DMV over the same period served as historical control. <b>Results:</b> There were 1292 participants in the control phase and 1099 in the experimental phase. New registration rate for the control was 33.8% (289/897); experimental phase 7.88% (61/769); DMV registration 21.02% (1902/9050). The intervention was associated with a significant decrease in registrations (OR 0.181 (95% CI 0.135-0.244, <i>P</i> < 0.001)). Offices were clustered based on sociodemographic factors and regressed in 2 clusters. Lower educational attainment was associated with lower registration in the first but not second cluster (OR = 0.948 (0.923-0.974, <i>P</i> < 0.001)). <b>Conclusions:</b> This study provided evidence that PCP offices were a feasible site for organ donor registration and calls into question the efficacy of written materials-only interventions for increasing organ donor RR. It reiterated the negative effect of lower educational attainment on registration and suggested future studies focus on more active methods of engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":20671,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Transplantation","volume":"32 4","pages":"292-299"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15269248221122885","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Despite strong public support, organ donor registration rates (RR) continue to lag while need only grows. In the United States, the traditional registration site is the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), however Primary care provider (PCP) offices have been considered as alternate locations for increasing RR. Methods: Twelve PCP offices across 2 New York Counties were subjected to a control week where participants received only a registration opportunity and an intervention week with the addition of a motivational poster and informational brochure. Zip code level sociodemographic data were obtained for each site. RR from the DMV over the same period served as historical control. Results: There were 1292 participants in the control phase and 1099 in the experimental phase. New registration rate for the control was 33.8% (289/897); experimental phase 7.88% (61/769); DMV registration 21.02% (1902/9050). The intervention was associated with a significant decrease in registrations (OR 0.181 (95% CI 0.135-0.244, P < 0.001)). Offices were clustered based on sociodemographic factors and regressed in 2 clusters. Lower educational attainment was associated with lower registration in the first but not second cluster (OR = 0.948 (0.923-0.974, P < 0.001)). Conclusions: This study provided evidence that PCP offices were a feasible site for organ donor registration and calls into question the efficacy of written materials-only interventions for increasing organ donor RR. It reiterated the negative effect of lower educational attainment on registration and suggested future studies focus on more active methods of engagement.
导言:尽管公众大力支持,器官捐献者登记率(RR)继续滞后,而需求只会增长。在美国,传统的登记地点是机动车辆管理局(DMV),但是初级保健提供者(PCP)办公室被认为是增加RR的替代地点。方法:纽约2个县的12个PCP办公室接受了一个控制周,参与者只收到一个注册机会和一个干预周,增加了一个激励海报和信息小册子。获得了每个站点的邮政编码级别的社会人口统计数据。同一时期车管所的RR作为历史对照。结果:对照组1292人,试验期1099人。对照组新登记率为33.8% (289/897);实验阶段7.88% (61/769);DMV注册21.02%(1902/9050)。干预与登记人数的显著减少相关(OR 0.181) (95% CI 0.135-0.244, P P)。结论:本研究提供的证据表明,PCP办公室是器官供者登记的可行地点,并对仅使用书面材料干预提高器官供者RR的有效性提出了质疑。它重申受教育程度较低对登记的负面影响,并建议今后的研究侧重于更积极的参与方法。
期刊介绍:
Progress in Transplantation (PIT) is the official journal of NATCO, The Organization for Transplant Professionals. Journal Partners include: Australasian Transplant Coordinators Association and Society for Transplant Social Workers. PIT reflects the multi-disciplinary team approach to procurement and clinical aspects of organ and tissue transplantation by providing a professional forum for exchange of the continually changing body of knowledge in transplantation.