Review and comparison of treatment effect estimators using propensity and prognostic scores.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Myoung-Jae Lee, Sanghyeok Lee
{"title":"Review and comparison of treatment effect estimators using propensity and prognostic scores.","authors":"Myoung-Jae Lee,&nbsp;Sanghyeok Lee","doi":"10.1515/ijb-2021-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In finding effects of a binary treatment, practitioners use mostly either propensity score matching (PSM) or inverse probability weighting (IPW). However, many new treatment effect estimators are available now using propensity score and \"prognostic score\", and some of these estimators are much better than PSM and IPW in several aspects. In this paper, we review those recent treatment effect estimators to show how they are related to one another, and why they are better than PSM and IPW. We compare 26 estimators in total through extensive simulation and empirical studies. Based on these, we recommend recent treatment effect estimators using \"overlap weight\", and \"targeted MLE\" using statistical/machine learning, as well as a simple regression imputation/adjustment estimator using linear prognostic score models.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/ijb-2021-0005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In finding effects of a binary treatment, practitioners use mostly either propensity score matching (PSM) or inverse probability weighting (IPW). However, many new treatment effect estimators are available now using propensity score and "prognostic score", and some of these estimators are much better than PSM and IPW in several aspects. In this paper, we review those recent treatment effect estimators to show how they are related to one another, and why they are better than PSM and IPW. We compare 26 estimators in total through extensive simulation and empirical studies. Based on these, we recommend recent treatment effect estimators using "overlap weight", and "targeted MLE" using statistical/machine learning, as well as a simple regression imputation/adjustment estimator using linear prognostic score models.

使用倾向和预后评分的治疗效果评估器的回顾和比较。
在寻找二元治疗的效果,从业者大多使用倾向得分匹配(PSM)或逆概率加权(IPW)。然而,现在有许多新的治疗效果估计方法,使用倾向评分和“预后评分”,其中一些估计方法在某些方面比PSM和IPW要好得多。在本文中,我们回顾了最近的治疗效果估计,以说明它们是如何相互关联的,以及为什么它们比PSM和IPW更好。我们通过广泛的模拟和实证研究比较了总共26个估计器。基于这些,我们推荐最近使用“重叠权重”的治疗效果估计器,使用统计/机器学习的“目标MLE”,以及使用线性预后评分模型的简单回归imputation/调整估计器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信