A Bias Toward Kindness Goals in Performance Feedback to Women (vs. Men).

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Lily Jampol, Aneeta Rattan, Elizabeth Baily Wolf
{"title":"A Bias Toward Kindness Goals in Performance Feedback to Women (vs. Men).","authors":"Lily Jampol,&nbsp;Aneeta Rattan,&nbsp;Elizabeth Baily Wolf","doi":"10.1177/01461672221088402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While research has documented positivity biases in workplace feedback to women versus men, this phenomenon is not fully understood. We take a motivational perspective, theorizing that the gender stereotype of warmth shapes feedback givers' goals, amplifying the importance placed on kindness when giving critical feedback to a woman versus a man. We found support for this hypothesis in a survey of professionals giving real developmental feedback (Study 1, <i>N</i> = 4,842 raters evaluating <i>N</i> = 423 individuals) and five experiments with MBA students, lab participants, and managers (Studies 2-5, <i>N</i> = 1,589). Across studies, people prioritized the goal of kindness more when they gave, or anticipated giving, critical feedback to a woman versus a man. Studies 1, 3, and 5 suggest that this kindness bias relates to gendered positivity biases, and Studies 4a and 4b tested potential mechanisms and supported an indirect effect through warmth. We discuss implications for the study of motivation and workplace gender bias.</p>","PeriodicalId":19834,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","volume":"49 10","pages":"1423-1438"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672221088402","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

While research has documented positivity biases in workplace feedback to women versus men, this phenomenon is not fully understood. We take a motivational perspective, theorizing that the gender stereotype of warmth shapes feedback givers' goals, amplifying the importance placed on kindness when giving critical feedback to a woman versus a man. We found support for this hypothesis in a survey of professionals giving real developmental feedback (Study 1, N = 4,842 raters evaluating N = 423 individuals) and five experiments with MBA students, lab participants, and managers (Studies 2-5, N = 1,589). Across studies, people prioritized the goal of kindness more when they gave, or anticipated giving, critical feedback to a woman versus a man. Studies 1, 3, and 5 suggest that this kindness bias relates to gendered positivity biases, and Studies 4a and 4b tested potential mechanisms and supported an indirect effect through warmth. We discuss implications for the study of motivation and workplace gender bias.

对女性(与男性)的绩效反馈中对善良目标的偏见。
虽然研究表明,工作场所对女性和男性的反馈存在积极偏见,但这一现象尚未得到充分理解。我们从动机的角度出发,理论上认为,对温暖的性别刻板印象塑造了反馈者的目标,在对女性和男性进行批判性反馈时,强化了善良的重要性。我们在一项针对提供真实发展反馈的专业人士的调查中发现了对这一假设的支持(研究1,N=4842名评分者评估N=423名个人),以及对MBA学生、实验室参与者和管理人员的五项实验(研究2-5,N=1589)。在所有研究中,当人们向女性或男性提供或预期提供关键反馈时,他们更优先考虑善良的目标。研究1、3和5表明,这种善良偏见与性别积极偏见有关,研究4a和4b测试了潜在的机制,并支持通过温暖产生的间接影响。我们讨论了动机和工作场所性别偏见研究的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: The Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin is the official journal for the Society of Personality and Social Psychology. The journal is an international outlet for original empirical papers in all areas of personality and social psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信