Comparison of Multi-Label U-Net and Mask R-CNN for panoramic radiograph segmentation to detect periodontitis.

IF 1.7 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Rini Widyaningrum, Ika Candradewi, Nur Rahman Ahmad Seno Aji, Rona Aulianisa
{"title":"Comparison of Multi-Label U-Net and Mask R-CNN for panoramic radiograph segmentation to detect periodontitis.","authors":"Rini Widyaningrum,&nbsp;Ika Candradewi,&nbsp;Nur Rahman Ahmad Seno Aji,&nbsp;Rona Aulianisa","doi":"10.5624/isd.20220105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Periodontitis, the most prevalent chronic inflammatory condition affecting teeth-supporting tissues, is diagnosed and classified through clinical and radiographic examinations. The staging of periodontitis using panoramic radiographs provides information for designing computer-assisted diagnostic systems. Performing image segmentation in periodontitis is required for image processing in diagnostic applications. This study evaluated image segmentation for periodontitis staging based on deep learning approaches.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Multi-Label U-Net and Mask R-CNN models were compared for image segmentation to detect periodontitis using 100 digital panoramic radiographs. Normal conditions and 4 stages of periodontitis were annotated on these panoramic radiographs. A total of 1100 original and augmented images were then randomly divided into a training (75%) dataset to produce segmentation models and a testing (25%) dataset to determine the evaluation metrics of the segmentation models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The performance of the segmentation models against the radiographic diagnosis of periodontitis conducted by a dentist was described by evaluation metrics (i.e., dice coefficient and intersection-over-union [IoU] score). Multi-Label U-Net achieved a dice coefficient of 0.96 and an IoU score of 0.97. Meanwhile, Mask R-CNN attained a dice coefficient of 0.87 and an IoU score of 0.74. U-Net showed the characteristic of semantic segmentation, and Mask R-CNN performed instance segmentation with accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score values of 95%, 85.6%, 88.2%, and 86.6%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multi-Label U-Net produced superior image segmentation to that of Mask R-CNN. The authors recommend integrating it with other techniques to develop hybrid models for automatic periodontitis detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":51714,"journal":{"name":"Imaging Science in Dentistry","volume":"52 4","pages":"383-391"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c2/51/isd-52-383.PMC9807794.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imaging Science in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.20220105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Purpose: Periodontitis, the most prevalent chronic inflammatory condition affecting teeth-supporting tissues, is diagnosed and classified through clinical and radiographic examinations. The staging of periodontitis using panoramic radiographs provides information for designing computer-assisted diagnostic systems. Performing image segmentation in periodontitis is required for image processing in diagnostic applications. This study evaluated image segmentation for periodontitis staging based on deep learning approaches.

Materials and methods: Multi-Label U-Net and Mask R-CNN models were compared for image segmentation to detect periodontitis using 100 digital panoramic radiographs. Normal conditions and 4 stages of periodontitis were annotated on these panoramic radiographs. A total of 1100 original and augmented images were then randomly divided into a training (75%) dataset to produce segmentation models and a testing (25%) dataset to determine the evaluation metrics of the segmentation models.

Results: The performance of the segmentation models against the radiographic diagnosis of periodontitis conducted by a dentist was described by evaluation metrics (i.e., dice coefficient and intersection-over-union [IoU] score). Multi-Label U-Net achieved a dice coefficient of 0.96 and an IoU score of 0.97. Meanwhile, Mask R-CNN attained a dice coefficient of 0.87 and an IoU score of 0.74. U-Net showed the characteristic of semantic segmentation, and Mask R-CNN performed instance segmentation with accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score values of 95%, 85.6%, 88.2%, and 86.6%, respectively.

Conclusion: Multi-Label U-Net produced superior image segmentation to that of Mask R-CNN. The authors recommend integrating it with other techniques to develop hybrid models for automatic periodontitis detection.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Multi-Label U-Net与Mask R-CNN在牙周炎全景x线片分割中的比较。
目的:牙周炎是影响牙齿支撑组织的最常见的慢性炎症,通过临床和放射检查进行诊断和分类。利用全景x线片的牙周炎分期为设计计算机辅助诊断系统提供了信息。在牙周炎中进行图像分割是诊断应用中图像处理所必需的。本研究评估了基于深度学习方法的牙周炎分期图像分割。材料与方法:采用100张数字全景x线片,比较Multi-Label U-Net和Mask R-CNN模型对牙周炎的图像分割效果。在这些全景x线片上标注了正常情况和牙周炎的4个阶段。然后将1100张原始和增强图像随机分为训练(75%)数据集来生成分割模型,测试(25%)数据集来确定分割模型的评价指标。结果:通过评价指标(骰子系数和IoU评分)来描述分割模型对牙医牙周炎放射诊断的性能。Multi-Label U-Net的骰子系数为0.96,IoU评分为0.97。Mask R-CNN的骰子系数为0.87,IoU评分为0.74。U-Net表现出语义分割的特点,Mask R-CNN进行实例分割,正确率为95%,精密度为85.6%,查全率为88.2%,f1得分为86.6%。结论:Multi-Label U-Net的图像分割效果优于Mask R-CNN。作者建议将其与其他技术相结合,开发用于牙周炎自动检测的混合模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Imaging Science in Dentistry
Imaging Science in Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信