Birth preparedness and complication readiness: Evaluating the "know-do" gap among women receiving antenatal care in Benin City, Nigeria.

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY
Journal of Biosocial Science Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-06 DOI:10.1017/S0021932022000475
Victor Ohenhen, Samson Aiwobeuke Oshomoh, Ejovi Akpojaro, Egbe Enobakhare, Christopher Ovenseri, Ejemai Eboreime
{"title":"Birth preparedness and complication readiness: Evaluating the \"know-do\" gap among women receiving antenatal care in Benin City, Nigeria.","authors":"Victor Ohenhen,&nbsp;Samson Aiwobeuke Oshomoh,&nbsp;Ejovi Akpojaro,&nbsp;Egbe Enobakhare,&nbsp;Christopher Ovenseri,&nbsp;Ejemai Eboreime","doi":"10.1017/S0021932022000475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Across several African countries, birth preparedness and complication readiness (BPACR) among pregnant women is poor. The practice of BPACR, though improving in recent years, is not commensurate with the knowledge available to pregnant women. Maternal health indices remain sub-optimal. This study evaluates the determinants of this \"know-do' gap among women receiving antenatal care at a secondary health facility in Benin City, Nigeria. A cross-sectional study involving 427 pregnant women was conducted between October and December 2020 using a structured interviewer-administered questionnaire. The prevalence of knowledge and practice were described, and the determinants of BPACR practice evaluated using bivariable (chi-square) analysis and multivariable ordinal logistic regression with post-estimation predictive margins analysis. About 77% of respondents had good birth preparedness practice. Multivariable regression revealed that respondents with poor knowledge and moderate knowledge of components of BPACR had statistically significant lower odds (OR:0.05 (95% CI: 0.02-0.13) and 0.10 (95% CI: 0.03-0.30) times, respectively) for greater practice of BPACR when compared to those with good knowledge. Respondents with poor knowledge of danger signs had statistically significant lower odds (OR: 0.08 (95% CI: 0.03-0.26) for greater practice of BPACR when compared to those with good knowledge. But predictive margins analyses demonstrates that knowledge, though critical to practice, is insufficient to optimize practice. The optimum number of danger signs women need to know to improve practice may be between eight to ten. Beyond this number, practice may not change significantly. Other predictors of BPACR practice include income level, parity, gravidity, and residential settings. The number of antenatal clinic visits had no statistically significant correlation with BPACR practice. Interventions to facilitate practice at the community level may be helpful to improve outcomes and bridge the know-do gap with respect to BPACR within the study context.</p>","PeriodicalId":47742,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biosocial Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biosocial Science","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932022000475","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Across several African countries, birth preparedness and complication readiness (BPACR) among pregnant women is poor. The practice of BPACR, though improving in recent years, is not commensurate with the knowledge available to pregnant women. Maternal health indices remain sub-optimal. This study evaluates the determinants of this "know-do' gap among women receiving antenatal care at a secondary health facility in Benin City, Nigeria. A cross-sectional study involving 427 pregnant women was conducted between October and December 2020 using a structured interviewer-administered questionnaire. The prevalence of knowledge and practice were described, and the determinants of BPACR practice evaluated using bivariable (chi-square) analysis and multivariable ordinal logistic regression with post-estimation predictive margins analysis. About 77% of respondents had good birth preparedness practice. Multivariable regression revealed that respondents with poor knowledge and moderate knowledge of components of BPACR had statistically significant lower odds (OR:0.05 (95% CI: 0.02-0.13) and 0.10 (95% CI: 0.03-0.30) times, respectively) for greater practice of BPACR when compared to those with good knowledge. Respondents with poor knowledge of danger signs had statistically significant lower odds (OR: 0.08 (95% CI: 0.03-0.26) for greater practice of BPACR when compared to those with good knowledge. But predictive margins analyses demonstrates that knowledge, though critical to practice, is insufficient to optimize practice. The optimum number of danger signs women need to know to improve practice may be between eight to ten. Beyond this number, practice may not change significantly. Other predictors of BPACR practice include income level, parity, gravidity, and residential settings. The number of antenatal clinic visits had no statistically significant correlation with BPACR practice. Interventions to facilitate practice at the community level may be helpful to improve outcomes and bridge the know-do gap with respect to BPACR within the study context.

生育准备和并发症准备:评估尼日利亚贝宁城接受产前护理的妇女之间的“知行”差距。
在几个非洲国家,孕妇的生育准备和并发症准备情况较差。BPACR的实践虽然近年来有所改进,但与孕妇所掌握的知识不相称。孕产妇健康指数仍然处于次优状态。本研究评估了“在尼日利亚贝宁城的一家二级卫生机构接受产前护理的妇女之间的知行差距。2020年10月至12月,使用结构化访谈问卷对427名孕妇进行了一项横断面研究。描述了知识和实践的流行率,并使用双变量评估了BPACR实践的决定因素(卡方)分析和具有估计后预测边际分析的多变量有序逻辑回归。约77%的受访者有良好的生育准备实践。多变量回归显示,与知识良好的受访者相比,对BPACR成分知之甚少和知之适度的受访者进行更多BPACR实践的几率在统计学上显著较低(OR:0.05(95%CI:0.02-0.13)和0.10(95%CI:0.03-0.30)倍)。与知识渊博的受访者相比,对危险信号知之甚少的受访者更多地使用BPACR的几率在统计学上显著较低(OR:0.08(95%CI:0.03-0.26)。但预测边际分析表明,知识虽然对实践至关重要,但不足以优化实践。女性需要了解的危险信号的最佳数量可能在8到10个之间。超过这个数字,实践可能不会发生重大变化。BPACR实践的其他预测因素包括收入水平、生育率、妊娠率和居住环境。产前门诊就诊次数与BPACR实践没有统计学上的显著相关性。在研究背景下,促进社区层面实践的干预措施可能有助于改善结果,弥合BPACR方面的知行差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
108
期刊介绍: Journal of Biosocial Science is a leading interdisciplinary and international journal in the field of biosocial science, the common ground between biology and sociology. It acts as an essential reference guide for all biological and social scientists working in these interdisciplinary areas, including social and biological aspects of reproduction and its control, gerontology, ecology, genetics, applied psychology, sociology, education, criminology, demography, health and epidemiology. Publishing original research papers, short reports, reviews, lectures and book reviews, the journal also includes a Debate section that encourages readers" comments on specific articles, with subsequent response from the original author.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信