Stakeholders' Views on Information Needed in a Patient Decision Aid for Microtia Reconstruction.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-05 DOI:10.1177/10556656221146584
E M Ronde, Veronique A P van de Lücht, N Lachkar, Dirk T Ubbink, Corstiaan C Breugem
{"title":"Stakeholders' Views on Information Needed in a Patient Decision Aid for Microtia Reconstruction.","authors":"E M Ronde, Veronique A P van de Lücht, N Lachkar, Dirk T Ubbink, Corstiaan C Breugem","doi":"10.1177/10556656221146584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess which information about microtia and the possible reconstructive options health care providers (HCPs), patients and parents believe should be included in a patient decision aid (PtDA).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A mixed-methods study comprised of an online survey of HCPs and focus group discussions with patients and parents.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Survey respondents were members of the International Society for Auricular Reconstruction (ISAR). Focus group participants were patients with microtia and their parents, recruited through the microtia outpatient clinic at Amsterdam UMC, and through a Dutch patient organization for cleft and craniofacial conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online, investigator-made survey was sent to ISAR members in December 2021. Semi-structured focus group discussions were held in February 2022. Quantitative results were summarized, and qualitative results were thematically grouped.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-two HCPs responded to the survey (response rate 41%). Most respondents (n = 24) were plastic surgeons, who had a median of 15 years of experience (IQR: 7-23 years). Two focus groups were held with a total of five patients and two parents. HCPs, patients and parents generally agreed on the information needed in a PtDA, emphasizing the importance of realistic expectation management. Patients and parents also considered psychosocial and functional outcomes, patient experiences, as well as patients' involvement in decision-making important.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A PtDA for microtia reconstruction should target all patients with microtia, and include information on at least technique-related information, expected esthetic results, possible adverse effects, psychosocial and functional outcomes and patient experiences. Preference eliciting questions should be developed for both pediatric patients and their parents.</p>","PeriodicalId":55255,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10981206/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656221146584","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess which information about microtia and the possible reconstructive options health care providers (HCPs), patients and parents believe should be included in a patient decision aid (PtDA).

Design: A mixed-methods study comprised of an online survey of HCPs and focus group discussions with patients and parents.

Participants: Survey respondents were members of the International Society for Auricular Reconstruction (ISAR). Focus group participants were patients with microtia and their parents, recruited through the microtia outpatient clinic at Amsterdam UMC, and through a Dutch patient organization for cleft and craniofacial conditions.

Methods: An online, investigator-made survey was sent to ISAR members in December 2021. Semi-structured focus group discussions were held in February 2022. Quantitative results were summarized, and qualitative results were thematically grouped.

Results: Thirty-two HCPs responded to the survey (response rate 41%). Most respondents (n = 24) were plastic surgeons, who had a median of 15 years of experience (IQR: 7-23 years). Two focus groups were held with a total of five patients and two parents. HCPs, patients and parents generally agreed on the information needed in a PtDA, emphasizing the importance of realistic expectation management. Patients and parents also considered psychosocial and functional outcomes, patient experiences, as well as patients' involvement in decision-making important.

Conclusions: A PtDA for microtia reconstruction should target all patients with microtia, and include information on at least technique-related information, expected esthetic results, possible adverse effects, psychosocial and functional outcomes and patient experiences. Preference eliciting questions should be developed for both pediatric patients and their parents.

利益相关者对小耳畸形整形患者决策辅助工具所需信息的看法。
目的:评估医疗服务提供者(HCP)、患者和家长认为患者决策辅助工具(PtDA)中应包含哪些有关小耳症和可能的整形方案的信息:评估医疗服务提供者(HCPs)、患者和家长认为哪些有关小耳症和可能的整形方案的信息应纳入患者决策辅助工具(PtDA):设计:一项混合方法研究,包括对医护人员的在线调查以及与患者和家长的焦点小组讨论:调查对象:调查对象为国际耳廓重建学会(ISAR)成员。焦点小组的参与者是小耳症患者及其家长,他们是通过阿姆斯特丹UMC的小耳症门诊以及荷兰的裂隙和颅面疾病患者组织招募的:2021年12月,向国际会计和报告准则政府间专家工作组的成员发送了一份由研究人员制作的在线调查问卷。2022 年 2 月举行了半结构化焦点小组讨论。对定量结果进行总结,对定性结果进行专题分组:32名高级专业人员对调查做出了回复(回复率为41%)。大多数受访者(n = 24)是整形外科医生,他们的工作经验中位数为 15 年(IQR:7-23 年)。共举行了两次焦点小组讨论,共有五名患者和两名家长参加。医疗保健人员、患者和家长普遍认同铂金酸钠(PtDA)中所需的信息,并强调了切合实际的期望管理的重要性。患者和家长还认为社会心理和功能结果、患者体验以及患者参与决策也很重要:结论:小颌畸形重建的颞下颌关节功能评估(PtDA)应针对所有小颌畸形患者,至少包括与技术相关的信息、预期的美学效果、可能的不良反应、社会心理和功能结果以及患者的经历。应针对小儿患者及其家长制定偏好诱导问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
36.40%
发文量
215
期刊介绍: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信