A calculus of probability or belief? Neural underpinnings of social decision-making in a card game

IF 2 3区 心理学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Yibei Chen , Sungbin Youk , Paula T. Wang , Paola Pinti , René Weber
{"title":"A calculus of probability or belief? Neural underpinnings of social decision-making in a card game","authors":"Yibei Chen ,&nbsp;Sungbin Youk ,&nbsp;Paula T. Wang ,&nbsp;Paola Pinti ,&nbsp;René Weber","doi":"10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>For decades, the prefrontal cortex<span><span> (PFC) has been the focus of social neuroscience<span> research, specifically regarding its role in competitive social decision-making. However, the distinct contributions of PFC subregions when making strategic decisions involving multiple types of information (social, non-social, and mixed information) remain unclear. This study investigates decision-making strategies (pure probability calculation vs. mentalizing) and their neural representations using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) data collected during a two-person card game. We observed individual differences in information processing strategy, indicating that some participants relied more on probability than others. Overall, the use of pure probability decreased over time in favor of other types of information (e.g., mixed information), with this effect being more pronounced within-round trials than across rounds. In the brain, (1) the lateral PFC activates when decisions are driven by probability calculations; (2) the right lateral PFC responds to trial difficulty; and (3) the anterior </span></span>medial PFC<span> is engaged when decision-making involves mentalizing. Furthermore, neural synchrony, which reflects the real-time interplay between individuals' cognitive processes, did not consistently contribute to correct decisions and fluctuated throughout the experiment, suggesting a hierarchical mentalizing mechanism at work.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":19279,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychologia","volume":"188 ","pages":"Article 108635"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychologia","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393223001690","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For decades, the prefrontal cortex (PFC) has been the focus of social neuroscience research, specifically regarding its role in competitive social decision-making. However, the distinct contributions of PFC subregions when making strategic decisions involving multiple types of information (social, non-social, and mixed information) remain unclear. This study investigates decision-making strategies (pure probability calculation vs. mentalizing) and their neural representations using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) data collected during a two-person card game. We observed individual differences in information processing strategy, indicating that some participants relied more on probability than others. Overall, the use of pure probability decreased over time in favor of other types of information (e.g., mixed information), with this effect being more pronounced within-round trials than across rounds. In the brain, (1) the lateral PFC activates when decisions are driven by probability calculations; (2) the right lateral PFC responds to trial difficulty; and (3) the anterior medial PFC is engaged when decision-making involves mentalizing. Furthermore, neural synchrony, which reflects the real-time interplay between individuals' cognitive processes, did not consistently contribute to correct decisions and fluctuated throughout the experiment, suggesting a hierarchical mentalizing mechanism at work.

概率演算还是信仰演算?纸牌游戏中社会决策的神经基础
几十年来,前额叶皮层(PFC)一直是社会神经科学研究的焦点,特别是关于其在竞争性社会决策中的作用。然而,在做出涉及多种类型信息(社会信息、非社会信息和混合信息)的战略决策时,PFC次区域的不同贡献仍不清楚。本研究使用在双人纸牌游戏中收集的功能性近红外光谱(fNIRS)数据,研究了决策策略(纯概率计算与心理化)及其神经表示。我们观察到信息处理策略的个体差异,表明一些参与者比其他参与者更依赖概率。总体而言,纯概率的使用随着时间的推移而减少,有利于其他类型的信息(例如,混合信息),这种影响在轮次试验中比跨轮次试验更明显。在大脑中,(1)当决策由概率计算驱动时,横向PFC激活;(2) 右侧PFC对试验难度作出反应;以及(3)当决策涉及心理化时,前-中PFC参与。此外,反映个体认知过程之间实时相互作用的神经同步性并没有始终如一地有助于做出正确的决定,并且在整个实验过程中有所波动,这表明存在一种分层的心理机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuropsychologia
Neuropsychologia 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
228
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Neuropsychologia is an international interdisciplinary journal devoted to experimental and theoretical contributions that advance understanding of human cognition and behavior from a neuroscience perspective. The journal will consider for publication studies that link brain function with cognitive processes, including attention and awareness, action and motor control, executive functions and cognitive control, memory, language, and emotion and social cognition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信