A Case of Clinical Confusion Due to Erroneous M-protein Quantifications: To Splice or Skim?

Q2 Medicine
Pak Cheung Chan, Amir Karin, Signy Chow
{"title":"A Case of Clinical Confusion Due to Erroneous M-protein Quantifications: To Splice or Skim?","authors":"Pak Cheung Chan,&nbsp;Amir Karin,&nbsp;Signy Chow","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An M-protein identified on electrophoresis is conventionally quantified by integrating the M-spike from baseline (PD), invariably including some irrelevant/background proteins. The use of an alternative approach that skims the M-spike tangentially thereby excluding the background proteins (TS), however, has been scanty. We report herein a case in which PD overestimated the M-proteins inconsistently, leading to confusion over relapse in a multiple myeloma patient. At diagnosis, a 65-year old male had an IgG kappa M-spike of 44 g/L which decreased to 6 g/L (PD) following chemotherapy. Six weeks after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), two M-spikes measuring respectively 10 and 5 g/L emerged. Together with decreases in hemoglobin and blood cell counts, a relapse was suspected. Bone marrow examinations, however, did not reveal any significant plasmacytosis or clonal restriction. Re-analyses by TS reduced the original M-protein estimations by 12% and 88% pre- and post-ASCT respectively, and corroborated the disease activity/status consistently.</p>","PeriodicalId":37192,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine","volume":"33 4","pages":"334-341"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b3/96/ejifcc-33-334.PMC9768617.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An M-protein identified on electrophoresis is conventionally quantified by integrating the M-spike from baseline (PD), invariably including some irrelevant/background proteins. The use of an alternative approach that skims the M-spike tangentially thereby excluding the background proteins (TS), however, has been scanty. We report herein a case in which PD overestimated the M-proteins inconsistently, leading to confusion over relapse in a multiple myeloma patient. At diagnosis, a 65-year old male had an IgG kappa M-spike of 44 g/L which decreased to 6 g/L (PD) following chemotherapy. Six weeks after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), two M-spikes measuring respectively 10 and 5 g/L emerged. Together with decreases in hemoglobin and blood cell counts, a relapse was suspected. Bone marrow examinations, however, did not reveal any significant plasmacytosis or clonal restriction. Re-analyses by TS reduced the original M-protein estimations by 12% and 88% pre- and post-ASCT respectively, and corroborated the disease activity/status consistently.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

错误的m蛋白定量导致临床混淆:剪接还是脱脂?
在电泳上鉴定的m蛋白通常是通过整合基线(PD)的m峰来定量的,其中总是包括一些不相关的/背景蛋白。然而,使用一种替代方法,即从切线上剥离m突,从而排除背景蛋白(TS),目前还很少。我们在此报告一个病例,PD高估m蛋白不一致,导致多发性骨髓瘤患者复发混淆。确诊时,65岁男性IgG kappa m峰值为44 g/L,化疗后降至6 g/L (PD)。自体干细胞移植(ASCT) 6周后,出现两个m -尖峰,分别为10和5 g/L。再加上血红蛋白和血细胞计数的减少,怀疑是复发。然而,骨髓检查未发现任何明显的浆细胞病或克隆限制。通过TS重新分析,asct前和asct后的m蛋白估定值分别降低了12%和88%,并一致地证实了疾病的活动/状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信