Comparative study of the effect of two different doses of intravenous labetalol on the cardiovascular response to endotracheal extubation.

IF 1.2 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Hamidreza Shetabi, Behzad Nazemroaya, Hosein Mahjobipoor, Sanaz Majidi
{"title":"Comparative study of the effect of two different doses of intravenous labetalol on the cardiovascular response to endotracheal extubation.","authors":"Hamidreza Shetabi,&nbsp;Behzad Nazemroaya,&nbsp;Hosein Mahjobipoor,&nbsp;Sanaz Majidi","doi":"10.34172/jcvtr.2023.31623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Providing a stable hemodynamic in extubation is important. We aimed to compare the effect of two different doses of intravenous labetalol on the cardiovascular response to endotracheal extubation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This double-blind randomized trial was performed in 2019-2020 in Isfahan on 72 patients under general anesthesia. Patients using Random Allocation software were divided into three groups and received 0.1 mg/ kg or 0.2 mg/kg labetalol and normal saline intravenously 10 min before extubation. Hemodynamic variables including heart rate (HR), Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and peripheral blood oxygen saturation(SPO2) was measured for each patient before induction of anesthesia and 1, 3, 5 and 10 minutes after extubation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SBP changes were significantly different between the three groups at 1, 3, 5 minutes after extubation (<i>P</i>=0.036, <i>P</i>=0.009, <i>P</i>=0.005 respectively) unlike the other two groups, patients who received 0.2 mg/kg labetalol did not have an increase in DBP after extubation (<i>P</i>>0.05). DBP was significantly different between the three groups one minute after extubation (<i>P</i>=0.03). At minutes 1 and 3 following extubation, there was a significant difference in the MAP between the three groups. (<i>P</i>=0.029 and <i>P</i>=0.012 respectively). There was no significant difference between the three groups regarding heart rate (<i>P</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tracheal extubation is usually associated with an increase in hemodynamic variables. Both doses of labetalol attenuate the hemodynamic response accompanying tracheal extubation. But labetalol 0.2 mg/kg in reducing hemodynamic response to extubation acted more effectively than labetalol 0.1mg/kg.</p>","PeriodicalId":15207,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10466463/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jcvtr.2023.31623","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Providing a stable hemodynamic in extubation is important. We aimed to compare the effect of two different doses of intravenous labetalol on the cardiovascular response to endotracheal extubation.

Methods: This double-blind randomized trial was performed in 2019-2020 in Isfahan on 72 patients under general anesthesia. Patients using Random Allocation software were divided into three groups and received 0.1 mg/ kg or 0.2 mg/kg labetalol and normal saline intravenously 10 min before extubation. Hemodynamic variables including heart rate (HR), Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and peripheral blood oxygen saturation(SPO2) was measured for each patient before induction of anesthesia and 1, 3, 5 and 10 minutes after extubation.

Results: SBP changes were significantly different between the three groups at 1, 3, 5 minutes after extubation (P=0.036, P=0.009, P=0.005 respectively) unlike the other two groups, patients who received 0.2 mg/kg labetalol did not have an increase in DBP after extubation (P>0.05). DBP was significantly different between the three groups one minute after extubation (P=0.03). At minutes 1 and 3 following extubation, there was a significant difference in the MAP between the three groups. (P=0.029 and P=0.012 respectively). There was no significant difference between the three groups regarding heart rate (P>0.05).

Conclusion: Tracheal extubation is usually associated with an increase in hemodynamic variables. Both doses of labetalol attenuate the hemodynamic response accompanying tracheal extubation. But labetalol 0.2 mg/kg in reducing hemodynamic response to extubation acted more effectively than labetalol 0.1mg/kg.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

两种不同剂量静脉注射拉贝他洛尔对气管内拔管后心血管反应影响的比较研究。
在拔管时提供稳定的血流动力学是很重要的。我们的目的是比较两种不同剂量静脉注射拉贝他洛尔对气管内拔管后心血管反应的影响。方法:本双盲随机试验于2019-2020年在伊斯法罕市对72例全麻患者进行研究。采用随机分配软件将患者分为三组,拔管前10分钟静脉滴注0.1 mg/kg或0.2 mg/kg的拉贝他洛尔和生理盐水。分别于麻醉诱导前及拔管后1、3、5、10分钟测量患者心率(HR)、收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、平均动脉压(MAP)、外周血氧饱和度(SPO2)等血流动力学指标。结果:三组患者拔管后1、3、5 min收缩压变化差异有统计学意义(P=0.036, P=0.009, P=0.005),与其他两组患者不同,0.2 mg/kg拉贝他洛尔组拔管后舒张压无升高(P>0.05)。拔管后1 min三组间DBP差异有统计学意义(P=0.03)。拔管后第1分钟和第3分钟,三组间MAP有显著差异。(P=0.029, P=0.012)。三组患者心率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:气管拔管通常与血流动力学变量的增加有关。两种剂量的拉贝他洛尔都减弱了气管拔管时的血流动力学反应。0.2 mg/kg的拉贝他洛尔比0.1mg/kg的拉贝他洛尔更有效地降低拔管时的血流动力学反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research
Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信