High On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity: Aspirin versus Clopidogrel.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Pharmacology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000527816
René M'Pembele, Samantha Ahlbrecht, Carolin Helten, Philipp Mourikis, David Naguib, Saif Zako, Kajetan Trojovsky, Ragnar Huhn, Tobias Petzold, Thomas Hohlfeld, Tobias Zeus, Malte Kelm, Lisa Dannenberg, Amin Polzin
{"title":"High On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity: Aspirin versus Clopidogrel.","authors":"René M'Pembele,&nbsp;Samantha Ahlbrecht,&nbsp;Carolin Helten,&nbsp;Philipp Mourikis,&nbsp;David Naguib,&nbsp;Saif Zako,&nbsp;Kajetan Trojovsky,&nbsp;Ragnar Huhn,&nbsp;Tobias Petzold,&nbsp;Thomas Hohlfeld,&nbsp;Tobias Zeus,&nbsp;Malte Kelm,&nbsp;Lisa Dannenberg,&nbsp;Amin Polzin","doi":"10.1159/000527816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antithrombotic regimen in patients on oral anticoagulation (OAC) post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is challenging. At least, one antiplatelet agent in combination with OAC is recommended after PCI for 6-12 months. Clopidogrel is used most frequently in this setting. However, data comparing P2Y12 inhibition with clopidogrel versus cyclooxygenase inhibition by acetylsalicylic acid (ASA, aspirin) is missing. It is well known that the antiplatelet effects of ASA and clopidogrel are frequently impaired (high on-treatment platelet reactivity [HTPR]). In this pilot investigation, we compared the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel versus ASA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective single-center database analysis, we investigated platelet reactivity by light transmission aggregometry in patients under different antiplatelet regimes. Results were presented as maximum of aggregation (MoA). HTPR to ASA and to clopidogrel were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>755 patients were enrolled. 677 were on ASA, 521 were on clopidogrel, and 198 had OAC. Overall mean age was 73 ± 13.4 years, and 458 (60.7%) were male. HTPR to ASA occurred in 94/677 patients (13.9%), and mean arachidonic acid-induced MoA was 14.15 ± 19.04%. HTPR to clopidogrel occurred in 241/521 patients (46.3%), and mean adenosine diphosphate-induced MoA was 50.06 ± 20.42%. HTPR to clopidogrel was significantly more frequent than HTPR to ASA; single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT)-mono ASA: 27/199 (13.6%) versus mono clopidogrel: 6/18 (33.3%); p = 0.037; SAPT with OAC-OAC with ASA: 8/35 (22.9%) versus OAC with clopidogrel: 27/60 (45%); p = 0.046. Same difference in HTPR contingency could be shown in subgroups of dual antiplatelet therapy and ASA + clopidogrel + OAC therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Impaired pharmacodynamic response to clopidogrel was more frequent as HTPR to ASA. Hence, ASA should be tested in combination with OAC post-PCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":20209,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacology","volume":"108 1","pages":"83-89"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000527816","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Antithrombotic regimen in patients on oral anticoagulation (OAC) post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is challenging. At least, one antiplatelet agent in combination with OAC is recommended after PCI for 6-12 months. Clopidogrel is used most frequently in this setting. However, data comparing P2Y12 inhibition with clopidogrel versus cyclooxygenase inhibition by acetylsalicylic acid (ASA, aspirin) is missing. It is well known that the antiplatelet effects of ASA and clopidogrel are frequently impaired (high on-treatment platelet reactivity [HTPR]). In this pilot investigation, we compared the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel versus ASA.

Methods: In this retrospective single-center database analysis, we investigated platelet reactivity by light transmission aggregometry in patients under different antiplatelet regimes. Results were presented as maximum of aggregation (MoA). HTPR to ASA and to clopidogrel were assessed.

Results: 755 patients were enrolled. 677 were on ASA, 521 were on clopidogrel, and 198 had OAC. Overall mean age was 73 ± 13.4 years, and 458 (60.7%) were male. HTPR to ASA occurred in 94/677 patients (13.9%), and mean arachidonic acid-induced MoA was 14.15 ± 19.04%. HTPR to clopidogrel occurred in 241/521 patients (46.3%), and mean adenosine diphosphate-induced MoA was 50.06 ± 20.42%. HTPR to clopidogrel was significantly more frequent than HTPR to ASA; single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT)-mono ASA: 27/199 (13.6%) versus mono clopidogrel: 6/18 (33.3%); p = 0.037; SAPT with OAC-OAC with ASA: 8/35 (22.9%) versus OAC with clopidogrel: 27/60 (45%); p = 0.046. Same difference in HTPR contingency could be shown in subgroups of dual antiplatelet therapy and ASA + clopidogrel + OAC therapy.

Conclusion: Impaired pharmacodynamic response to clopidogrel was more frequent as HTPR to ASA. Hence, ASA should be tested in combination with OAC post-PCI.

高治疗期血小板反应性:阿司匹林与氯吡格雷。
背景:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后口服抗凝(OAC)患者的抗血栓治疗方案具有挑战性。PCI术后6-12个月,至少推荐一种抗血小板药物联合OAC。氯吡格雷在这种情况下最常用。然而,比较氯吡格雷抑制P2Y12与乙酰水杨酸(ASA,阿司匹林)抑制环氧化酶的数据缺失。众所周知,ASA和氯吡格雷的抗血小板作用经常受损(治疗时血小板反应性高[HTPR])。在这项初步研究中,我们比较了氯吡格雷和ASA的抗血小板作用。方法:在回顾性单中心数据库分析中,我们通过光透射聚集法研究了不同抗血小板方案患者的血小板反应性。结果以聚合最大值(MoA)表示。对ASA和氯吡格雷进行HTPR评估。结果:755例患者入组。677人服用ASA, 521人服用氯吡格雷,198人服用OAC。总体平均年龄73±13.4岁,男性458例(60.7%)。677例患者中有94例(13.9%)发生HTPR到ASA,花生四烯酸诱导的MoA平均为14.15±19.04%。521例患者中有241例(46.3%)发生对氯吡格雷的HTPR,二磷酸腺苷诱导的MoA平均为50.06±20.42%。HTPR对氯吡格雷的发生率明显高于HTPR对ASA的发生率;单抗血小板治疗(SAPT)-单抗ASA: 27/199 (13.6%) vs单抗氯吡格雷:6/18 (33.3%);P = 0.037;SAPT + OAC-OAC + ASA: 8/35 (22.9%) vs + OAC +氯吡格雷:27/60 (45%);P = 0.046。在双重抗血小板治疗和ASA +氯吡格雷+ OAC治疗的亚组中,HTPR意外发生率也有相同的差异。结论:氯吡格雷对ASA的药效学影响较HTPR更为常见。因此,ASA应与pci后OAC联合检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmacology
Pharmacology 医学-药学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Pharmacology'' is an international forum to present and discuss current perspectives in drug research. The journal communicates research in basic and clinical pharmacology and related fields. It covers biochemical pharmacology, molecular pharmacology, immunopharmacology, drug metabolism, pharmacogenetics, analytical toxicology, neuropsychopharmacology, pharmacokinetics and clinical pharmacology. In addition to original papers and short communications of investigative findings and pharmacological profiles the journal contains reviews, comments and perspective notes; research communications of novel therapeutic agents are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信