Patterns of integration and modularity in the primate skeleton: a review.

IF 1.6 2区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Noreen von Cramon-Taubadel
{"title":"Patterns of integration and modularity in the primate skeleton: a review.","authors":"Noreen von Cramon-Taubadel","doi":"10.4436/JASS.10012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The question of how complex morphologies evolve, given constraints imposed by genetic, developmental and functional factors, has been a topic of inquiry for many decades. In the mid-twentieth century the study of morphological trait covariation, and the implications of this for evolutionary diversification, was developed under the general concept of \"morphological integration\". Given the polygenic inheritance model underlying quantitative skeletal traits, and the existence of differential pleiotropic effects, it is assumed that variation in the genotype to phenotype map will lead to the emergence of semi-autonomous \"modules\" that share relatively stronger covariance (integration) among traits within them. Understanding these potential patterns of modularity in the primate skeleton is important for clarifying the seeming inconsistencies presented by \"mosaic\" morphologies found in fossil taxa, as well as providing hypothetical units of morphological evolution that can be compared across the primate order. A review of the primate skeletal integration and modularity literature was conducted with the aim of assessing (i) the general nature of primate skeletal integration patterns, and (ii) the extent to which any identified modularity patterns are ubiquitous across primates. The vast literature on cranial integration reveals some consistency in suggesting that the face and the neurocranium (and in some cases, the basicranium and vault) form distinct modules, but the intensity of this modular pattern varies across taxa. The much more modest postcranial integration literature suggests that apes show overall reduced covariation among skeletal regions compared with other anthropoid taxa, but the extent to which any identified modularity patterns hold true across primates is still very unclear. While much has been learned about primate skeletal integration in the past two decades, we still need more studies that establish benchmarks as to what constitutes an integrated modular structure, and that empirically test these potential modules across a wider range of primate taxa.</p>","PeriodicalId":48668,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anthropological Sciences","volume":"100 ","pages":"109-140"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anthropological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4436/JASS.10012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The question of how complex morphologies evolve, given constraints imposed by genetic, developmental and functional factors, has been a topic of inquiry for many decades. In the mid-twentieth century the study of morphological trait covariation, and the implications of this for evolutionary diversification, was developed under the general concept of "morphological integration". Given the polygenic inheritance model underlying quantitative skeletal traits, and the existence of differential pleiotropic effects, it is assumed that variation in the genotype to phenotype map will lead to the emergence of semi-autonomous "modules" that share relatively stronger covariance (integration) among traits within them. Understanding these potential patterns of modularity in the primate skeleton is important for clarifying the seeming inconsistencies presented by "mosaic" morphologies found in fossil taxa, as well as providing hypothetical units of morphological evolution that can be compared across the primate order. A review of the primate skeletal integration and modularity literature was conducted with the aim of assessing (i) the general nature of primate skeletal integration patterns, and (ii) the extent to which any identified modularity patterns are ubiquitous across primates. The vast literature on cranial integration reveals some consistency in suggesting that the face and the neurocranium (and in some cases, the basicranium and vault) form distinct modules, but the intensity of this modular pattern varies across taxa. The much more modest postcranial integration literature suggests that apes show overall reduced covariation among skeletal regions compared with other anthropoid taxa, but the extent to which any identified modularity patterns hold true across primates is still very unclear. While much has been learned about primate skeletal integration in the past two decades, we still need more studies that establish benchmarks as to what constitutes an integrated modular structure, and that empirically test these potential modules across a wider range of primate taxa.

灵长类动物骨骼的整合和模块化模式:综述。
在遗传、发育和功能因素的限制下,复杂的形态是如何进化的,这个问题已经被探究了几十年。20世纪中期,在“形态整合”的一般概念下,对形态特征共变异及其对进化多样化的影响的研究得到了发展。考虑到数量骨骼性状的多基因遗传模型,以及差异多效效应的存在,假设基因型到表型图谱的变化将导致半自治“模块”的出现,这些“模块”在其中的性状之间具有相对较强的协方差(整合)。了解灵长类骨骼中这些潜在的模块化模式对于澄清化石分类群中发现的“马赛克”形态所呈现的表面上的不一致性,以及提供可以在灵长类目中进行比较的形态进化的假设单位非常重要。对灵长类动物骨骼整合和模块化的文献进行了回顾,目的是评估:(i)灵长类动物骨骼整合模式的一般性质,以及(ii)任何已确定的模块化模式在灵长类动物中普遍存在的程度。大量关于颅骨整合的文献表明,面部和神经头盖骨(在某些情况下,基本头盖骨和拱顶)形成了不同的模块,但这种模块模式的强度在不同的分类群中有所不同。更为温和的颅后整合文献表明,与其他类人猿类群相比,类人猿在骨骼区域之间的共变总体上减少了,但任何已确定的模块化模式在灵长类动物中适用的程度仍然非常不清楚。虽然在过去的二十年里,我们对灵长类动物骨骼的整合已经有了很多了解,但我们仍然需要更多的研究来建立一个集成模块化结构的基准,并在更广泛的灵长类类群中对这些潜在的模块进行实证测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Anthropological Sciences
Journal of Anthropological Sciences Social Sciences-Anthropology
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: The Journal of Anthropological Sciences (JASs) publishes reviews, original papers and notes concerning human paleontology, prehistory, biology and genetics of extinct and extant populations. Particular attention is paid to the significance of Anthropology as an interdisciplinary field of research. Only papers in English can be considered for publication. All contributions are revised by the editorial board together with the panel of referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信