Measuring Electronically Shared Rape Myths: Scale Creation and Correlates.

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Journal of Interpersonal Violence Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-31 DOI:10.1177/08862605231197140
Elyse J Thulin, Autumn Rae Florimbio, Meredith L Philyaw-Kotov, Maureen A Walton, Erin E Bonar
{"title":"Measuring Electronically Shared Rape Myths: Scale Creation and Correlates.","authors":"Elyse J Thulin, Autumn Rae Florimbio, Meredith L Philyaw-Kotov, Maureen A Walton, Erin E Bonar","doi":"10.1177/08862605231197140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Increased access to information online (e.g., social media) provides opportunities for exposure to rape myths (i.e., false beliefs about incidents of sexual assault). Social media, in particular, may serve a critical role in shaping rape culture. Thus, it is important to identify ways to assess online exposure to rape myths, especially given the influence online exposure may have on offline behaviors. Data were analyzed from 2,609 18-25-year-old participants (mean age = 20.9 years; 46.1% male; 71.6% White) recruited in 2017 through social media to complete an online survey on experiences and perceptions of sexual violence. We used exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA, CFA) to evaluate the relatedness of nine items adapted to reflect rape myths posted by friends on social media. We split the sample into training (50%) and testing (50%) sets for the EFA and CFA, respectively, then evaluated the correlation between experiences of sexual violence, substance use, and social media use and exposure to online rape myths. Eigenvalues (1-factor: 5.509; 2-factor: 0.803; 3-factor: 0.704; 4-factor: 0.482), factor loadings, fit statistics (RMSEA: 0.03; CFI: 0.99; TLI: 0.99; SRMR: 0.057), interpretability, and existing theory supported a 1-factor solution, which was supported by CFA fit statistics (RMSEA: 0.021; CFI: 0.99; TLI: 0.99; SRMR: 0.038<b>)</b>. Cronbach's alpha of the nine items was .77. Greater exposure to online rape myths was associated with greater likelihood of attempted rape perpetration (<i>β</i> = .052, <i>SE</i> = .016, <i>p</i> < .005), rape victimization (<i>β</i> = .045, <i>SE</i> = .009, <i>p</i> < .005), use of illicit drugs (<i>β</i> = .021, <i>SE</i> = 0.008, <i>p</i> < .05), being male (<i>β</i> = .017, <i>SE</i> = .008, <i>p</i> < .05), and being younger (<i>β</i> = -.008, <i>SE</i> = .002, <i>p</i> < .005). Our findings support assessing exposure to online rape myths, which may be important for informing sexual violence prevention and intervention efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":16289,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","volume":" ","pages":"369-392"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605231197140","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Increased access to information online (e.g., social media) provides opportunities for exposure to rape myths (i.e., false beliefs about incidents of sexual assault). Social media, in particular, may serve a critical role in shaping rape culture. Thus, it is important to identify ways to assess online exposure to rape myths, especially given the influence online exposure may have on offline behaviors. Data were analyzed from 2,609 18-25-year-old participants (mean age = 20.9 years; 46.1% male; 71.6% White) recruited in 2017 through social media to complete an online survey on experiences and perceptions of sexual violence. We used exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA, CFA) to evaluate the relatedness of nine items adapted to reflect rape myths posted by friends on social media. We split the sample into training (50%) and testing (50%) sets for the EFA and CFA, respectively, then evaluated the correlation between experiences of sexual violence, substance use, and social media use and exposure to online rape myths. Eigenvalues (1-factor: 5.509; 2-factor: 0.803; 3-factor: 0.704; 4-factor: 0.482), factor loadings, fit statistics (RMSEA: 0.03; CFI: 0.99; TLI: 0.99; SRMR: 0.057), interpretability, and existing theory supported a 1-factor solution, which was supported by CFA fit statistics (RMSEA: 0.021; CFI: 0.99; TLI: 0.99; SRMR: 0.038). Cronbach's alpha of the nine items was .77. Greater exposure to online rape myths was associated with greater likelihood of attempted rape perpetration (β = .052, SE = .016, p < .005), rape victimization (β = .045, SE = .009, p < .005), use of illicit drugs (β = .021, SE = 0.008, p < .05), being male (β = .017, SE = .008, p < .05), and being younger (β = -.008, SE = .002, p < .005). Our findings support assessing exposure to online rape myths, which may be important for informing sexual violence prevention and intervention efforts.

测量电子共享的强奸神话:量表创建与相关性
网络(如社交媒体)信息获取的增加为强奸迷思(即对性侵犯事件的错误看法)提供了机会。尤其是社交媒体,可能会在塑造强奸文化方面发挥关键作用。因此,特别是考虑到在线接触可能会对离线行为产生的影响,确定评估在线接触强奸谬论的方法就显得尤为重要。我们对 2017 年通过社交媒体招募的 2609 名 18-25 岁参与者(平均年龄 = 20.9 岁;46.1% 为男性;71.6% 为白人)的数据进行了分析,这些参与者完成了一项关于性暴力经历和看法的在线调查。我们使用探索性和确认性因子分析(EFA、CFA)来评估九个项目的相关性,这九个项目经过改编,反映了朋友在社交媒体上发布的强奸迷思。我们将样本分为训练集(50%)和测试集(50%),分别进行 EFA 和 CFA 分析,然后评估性暴力经历、药物使用和社交媒体使用与网络强奸迷思暴露之间的相关性。特征值(1-因子:5.509;2-因子:0.803;3-因子:0.704;4-因子:0.482)、因子载荷、拟合统计量(RMSEA:0.03;CFI:0.99;TLI:0.99;SRMR:0.057)、可解释性和现有理论支持 1 因子解,CFA 拟合统计量(RMSEA:0.021;CFI:0.99;TLI:0.99;SRMR:0.038)也支持 1 因子解。九个项目的 Cronbach's alpha 为 0.77。更多地接触网上强奸迷思与更大的强奸未遂可能性相关(β = .052,SE = .016,p β = .045,SE = .009,p β = .021,SE = 0.008,p β = .017,SE = .008,p β = -.008,SE = .002,p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
375
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interpersonal Violence is devoted to the study and treatment of victims and perpetrators of interpersonal violence. It provides a forum of discussion of the concerns and activities of professionals and researchers working in domestic violence, child sexual abuse, rape and sexual assault, physical child abuse, and violent crime. With its dual focus on victims and victimizers, the journal will publish material that addresses the causes, effects, treatment, and prevention of all types of violence. JIV only publishes reports on individual studies in which the scientific method is applied to the study of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Research may use qualitative or quantitative methods. JIV does not publish reviews of research, individual case studies, or the conceptual analysis of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Outcome data for program or intervention evaluations must include a comparison or control group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信