Tear Film Lipid Layer Changes Following Combined Effect of Heated Eye Mask with Intense Pulsed Light Therapy for Evaporative Dry Eye: A Randomized Control Study.
Liangzhe Li, Jiayan Chen, Guanghao Qin, Yifan Qi, Yimeng Chen, Mingze Li, Qing Zhang, Yuan Cheng, Naici Guo, Salissou Moutari, Jonathan E Moore, Sile Yu, Xingru He, Emmanuel Eric Pazo
{"title":"Tear Film Lipid Layer Changes Following Combined Effect of Heated Eye Mask with Intense Pulsed Light Therapy for Evaporative Dry Eye: A Randomized Control Study.","authors":"Liangzhe Li, Jiayan Chen, Guanghao Qin, Yifan Qi, Yimeng Chen, Mingze Li, Qing Zhang, Yuan Cheng, Naici Guo, Salissou Moutari, Jonathan E Moore, Sile Yu, Xingru He, Emmanuel Eric Pazo","doi":"10.1089/photob.2023.0051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Dry eye disease (DED) is a complex ocular surface inflammatory disorder with a multifactorial etiology. Therapies such as intense pulsed light (IPL) and heated eye mask (HEM) have been reported to improve the tear film lipid layer (TFLL) and signs and symptoms of DED. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This randomized study aimed to compare the effects of IPL combined with HEM (IPL+HEM) group, IPL group, and control group in participants with evaporative DED. All participants were examined at baseline (D0), day 21 (D21), day 42 (D42), and day 84 (D84) for noninvasive tear breakup time (NITBUT), TFLL, corneal conjunctival staining (CS), meibomian gland quality (MGQ), meibomian gland expressibility (MGEx), and Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI). <b><i>Results:</i></b> The mean age of participants was IPL+HEM: 28.06 ± 3.88 years, IPL: 29.88 ± 4.68 years, and control: 28.52 ± 3.77 years. At D84, significant improvements in TFLL (<i>p</i> < 0.05), noninvasive tear breakup time (NITBUT) (<i>p</i> < 0.05), corneoconjunctival staining (CS) (<i>p</i> < 0.05), MGQ (<i>p</i> < 0.05), MGEx (<i>p</i> < 0.05), and OSDI (<i>p</i> < 0.05) were found in the IPL+HEM and IPL groups, whereas the control group had no significant improvements. Furthermore, ΔTFLL significantly correlated with ΔNITBUT (<i>r</i> = -0.678, <i>p</i> < 0.001), ΔCS (<i>r</i> = 0.321, <i>p</i> < 0.001), ΔMGQ (<i>r</i> = 0.669, <i>p</i> < 0.001), ΔMGEx (<i>r</i> = 0.598, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and ΔOSDI score (<i>r</i> = 0.649, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> IPL therapy in combination with HEM and IPL therapy only can significantly improve the quality of TFLL and clinically reduce the sign and symptoms of evaporative DED. However, IPL therapy in combination with HEM was found to be more effective than IPL therapy alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":20111,"journal":{"name":"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery","volume":"41 8","pages":"435-444"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10460692/pdf/photob.2023.0051.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/photob.2023.0051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Dry eye disease (DED) is a complex ocular surface inflammatory disorder with a multifactorial etiology. Therapies such as intense pulsed light (IPL) and heated eye mask (HEM) have been reported to improve the tear film lipid layer (TFLL) and signs and symptoms of DED. Methods: This randomized study aimed to compare the effects of IPL combined with HEM (IPL+HEM) group, IPL group, and control group in participants with evaporative DED. All participants were examined at baseline (D0), day 21 (D21), day 42 (D42), and day 84 (D84) for noninvasive tear breakup time (NITBUT), TFLL, corneal conjunctival staining (CS), meibomian gland quality (MGQ), meibomian gland expressibility (MGEx), and Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI). Results: The mean age of participants was IPL+HEM: 28.06 ± 3.88 years, IPL: 29.88 ± 4.68 years, and control: 28.52 ± 3.77 years. At D84, significant improvements in TFLL (p < 0.05), noninvasive tear breakup time (NITBUT) (p < 0.05), corneoconjunctival staining (CS) (p < 0.05), MGQ (p < 0.05), MGEx (p < 0.05), and OSDI (p < 0.05) were found in the IPL+HEM and IPL groups, whereas the control group had no significant improvements. Furthermore, ΔTFLL significantly correlated with ΔNITBUT (r = -0.678, p < 0.001), ΔCS (r = 0.321, p < 0.001), ΔMGQ (r = 0.669, p < 0.001), ΔMGEx (r = 0.598, p < 0.001), and ΔOSDI score (r = 0.649, p < 0.001). Conclusions: IPL therapy in combination with HEM and IPL therapy only can significantly improve the quality of TFLL and clinically reduce the sign and symptoms of evaporative DED. However, IPL therapy in combination with HEM was found to be more effective than IPL therapy alone.
背景:干眼病(DED)是一种复杂的眼表炎症性疾病,具有多因素病因。据报道,强脉冲光(IPL)和加热眼罩(HEM)等疗法可以改善泪膜脂质层(TFLL)和DED的体征和症状。方法:本随机研究旨在比较IPL联合HEM (IPL+HEM)组、IPL组和对照组对蒸发性DED患者的影响。所有参与者在基线(D0)、第21天(D21)、第42天(D42)和第84天(D84)检查无创撕裂时间(NITBUT)、TFLL、角膜结膜染色(CS)、睑板腺质量(MGQ)、睑板腺表达性(MGEx)和眼表疾病指数(OSDI)。结果:参与者的平均年龄为:IPL+HEM: 28.06±3.88岁,IPL: 29.88±4.68岁,对照组:28.52±3.77岁。在TFLL D84,显著改善(p p p p p p r = -0.678, p r = 0.321, p r = 0.669, p r = 0.598, p r = 0.649, p结论:IPL治疗结合哼哼和IPL治疗可以显著提高TFLL的质量和临床减少蒸发d的迹象和症状。然而,IPL联合HEM治疗被发现比单独IPL治疗更有效。