The biomechanical stability of miniplate osteosynthesis configurations in bilateral mandibular angle fractures.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Journal of oral science Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-31 DOI:10.2334/josnusd.23-0164
Nida Ay, Senem Yildirimturk Dogan, Yigit Sirin
{"title":"The biomechanical stability of miniplate osteosynthesis configurations in bilateral mandibular angle fractures.","authors":"Nida Ay,&nbsp;Senem Yildirimturk Dogan,&nbsp;Yigit Sirin","doi":"10.2334/josnusd.23-0164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The present study investigated the biomechanical stability of three miniplate osteosynthesis configurations used for internal fixation of bilateral mandibular angle fracture (BMAF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Standard fracture lines were created in 72 polyurethane mandibles and stabilized with 2.0-mm, 4-hole standard titanium miniplates and monocortical screws. The group descriptions and miniplate configurations were: 2Plates (1-1), 3Plates (1-2) and 4Plates (2-2). The mandibles were subjected to either incisal or molar loads (from both sides in the 3Plates group) up to a force of 120 N. The displacements of the constructs were recorded at each force increment of 10 N. ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc tests were used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 2Plates group showed higher displacement under both loading conditions (P < 0.05 for each). The same group reached displacement levels of 1 mm and 3 mm during molar loading and 1 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm during incisal loading at lower force magnitudes relative to others (P < 0.05 for each).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bone-plate constructs for BMAFs stabilized with three or four standard miniplates are more likely to provide similar resistance when subjected to incisal or molar loads, in contrast to the two-miniplate configuration, which is relatively more prone to displacement.</p>","PeriodicalId":16646,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.23-0164","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The present study investigated the biomechanical stability of three miniplate osteosynthesis configurations used for internal fixation of bilateral mandibular angle fracture (BMAF).

Methods: Standard fracture lines were created in 72 polyurethane mandibles and stabilized with 2.0-mm, 4-hole standard titanium miniplates and monocortical screws. The group descriptions and miniplate configurations were: 2Plates (1-1), 3Plates (1-2) and 4Plates (2-2). The mandibles were subjected to either incisal or molar loads (from both sides in the 3Plates group) up to a force of 120 N. The displacements of the constructs were recorded at each force increment of 10 N. ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc tests were used for statistical analysis.

Results: The 2Plates group showed higher displacement under both loading conditions (P < 0.05 for each). The same group reached displacement levels of 1 mm and 3 mm during molar loading and 1 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm during incisal loading at lower force magnitudes relative to others (P < 0.05 for each).

Conclusion: Bone-plate constructs for BMAFs stabilized with three or four standard miniplates are more likely to provide similar resistance when subjected to incisal or molar loads, in contrast to the two-miniplate configuration, which is relatively more prone to displacement.

微型接骨板在双侧下颌角骨折中的生物力学稳定性。
目的:本研究探讨了三种用于双侧下颌角骨折(BMAF)内固定的微型接骨板组合的生物力学稳定性。方法:在72个聚氨酯下颌骨上建立标准骨折线,并用2.0mm、4孔标准钛微型板和单皮质螺钉固定。组描述和微型板配置为:2个板(1-1)、3个板(1-2)和4个板(2-2)。下颌骨承受高达120N的切向或磨牙载荷(来自3Plates组的两侧)。在每次10N的力增量下记录结构的位移。ANOVA和Tukey的事后检验用于统计分析。结果:2Plates组在两种载荷条件下均表现出较高的位移(P均<0.05)。同一组在磨牙加载过程中达到了1 mm和3 mm的位移水平,在切迹加载过程中,与其他组相比,在较低的力大小下达到了1毫米、3毫米和5毫米的位移水平(各P<0.05)。结论:与相对更容易移位的两种微型钢板结构相比,用三块或四块标准微型钢板稳定的BMAF骨板结构在承受切向或磨牙载荷时更有可能提供相似的阻力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of oral science
Journal of oral science DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信