Workers' Acceptance of Digital Procedures: An Application of the Technology Acceptance Model.

Joseph W Hendricks, Alec Smith, S Camille Peres, Farzan Sasangohar
{"title":"Workers' Acceptance of Digital Procedures: An Application of the Technology Acceptance Model.","authors":"Joseph W Hendricks, Alec Smith, S Camille Peres, Farzan Sasangohar","doi":"10.1080/24725838.2023.2240342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>OCCUPATIONAL APPLICATIONSThere are increasing numbers of organizations that are implementing digital procedures (e.g., standard operating procedures). These efforts are often assumed to be a positive development but can be quite costly-both in terms of money and training for a digital rollout. As a result, organizations and practitioners may find themselves at risk for failure when implementing digital procedures. The results of the current study suggest that if workers perceive digital procedures as useful and easy to use, this perception translates into positive attitudes, which subsequently result in fewer deviations. Since acceptance is relatively easy to assess, practitioners can benefit from using these assessments prior to a digital transition/roll-out to both compare competing hardware and software applications, and to initiate and continuously monitor the development of digital procedures. We consider this approach as advantageous to having management develop a system and fully deploying digital procedures without any consideration of worker acceptance.</p>","PeriodicalId":73332,"journal":{"name":"IISE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors","volume":"11 1-2","pages":"59-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IISE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2023.2240342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OCCUPATIONAL APPLICATIONSThere are increasing numbers of organizations that are implementing digital procedures (e.g., standard operating procedures). These efforts are often assumed to be a positive development but can be quite costly-both in terms of money and training for a digital rollout. As a result, organizations and practitioners may find themselves at risk for failure when implementing digital procedures. The results of the current study suggest that if workers perceive digital procedures as useful and easy to use, this perception translates into positive attitudes, which subsequently result in fewer deviations. Since acceptance is relatively easy to assess, practitioners can benefit from using these assessments prior to a digital transition/roll-out to both compare competing hardware and software applications, and to initiate and continuously monitor the development of digital procedures. We consider this approach as advantageous to having management develop a system and fully deploying digital procedures without any consideration of worker acceptance.

工人对数字化程序的接受:技术接受模型的应用。
职业应用越来越多的组织正在实施数字程序(例如标准操作程序)。这些努力通常被认为是一个积极的发展,但在资金和数字推广培训方面都可能相当昂贵。因此,组织和从业者在实施数字程序时可能会发现自己面临失败的风险。目前的研究结果表明,如果员工认为数字程序有用且易于使用,这种看法就会转化为积极的态度,从而减少偏差。由于验收相对容易评估,从业者可以在数字化转型/推出之前使用这些评估来比较竞争对手的硬件和软件应用程序,并启动和持续监控数字化程序的开发,从而从中受益。我们认为这种方法有利于让管理层开发一个系统,并在不考虑工人接受的情况下全面部署数字程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信