Effect of Laryngeal Mask Airway on Image Quality in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Q2 Medicine
Mohamed A Wadod, Omnia Mohammed Aboelazm, Mai Mohammed El Rawas
{"title":"Effect of Laryngeal Mask Airway on Image Quality in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Mohamed A Wadod,&nbsp;Omnia Mohammed Aboelazm,&nbsp;Mai Mohammed El Rawas","doi":"10.5812/aapm-129532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is highly sensitive to motion, resulting in artifacts and lowering image quality. Laryngeal mask airway (LMA) provides numerous advantages over endotracheal tubes as it reduces laryngospasm, coughing, and the risk of postoperative desaturation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to compare LMA with oral airway for airway management during brain MRI in terms of reducing motion artifacts, which can improve image quality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized, controlled, double-blind trial was carried out on 40 pediatrics aged 1 - 18 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status І and П undergoing brain MRI. Patients were randomized into two equal groups according to the airway method, the control (Guedel oral airway) group and the LMA group. A compatible anesthesia machine was used to provide O<sub>2</sub> and sevoflurane 2% - 4%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean MRI image quality score was significantly higher in the LMA group than in the control group (26.10 ± 3.97 versus 18.60 ± 5.30, P < 0.001). Mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate were significantly lower in the LMA group than in the control group at all study times except at baseline and immediate post-extubation (P < 0.05). Cough was significantly lower in LMA than in the control group (15% vs. 50%, P = 0.040). Airway complications (sore throat, laryngeal spasm, and bronchospasm), nausea, and vomiting did not have a significantly different between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to Guedel oral airway, using LMA for airway management in pediatrics undergoing MRI scans improved the image quality with less cough and better hemodynamics.</p>","PeriodicalId":7841,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","volume":"13 2","pages":"e129532"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/58/91/aapm-13-2-129532.PMC10461386.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-129532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is highly sensitive to motion, resulting in artifacts and lowering image quality. Laryngeal mask airway (LMA) provides numerous advantages over endotracheal tubes as it reduces laryngospasm, coughing, and the risk of postoperative desaturation.

Objectives: We aimed to compare LMA with oral airway for airway management during brain MRI in terms of reducing motion artifacts, which can improve image quality.

Methods: This randomized, controlled, double-blind trial was carried out on 40 pediatrics aged 1 - 18 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status І and П undergoing brain MRI. Patients were randomized into two equal groups according to the airway method, the control (Guedel oral airway) group and the LMA group. A compatible anesthesia machine was used to provide O2 and sevoflurane 2% - 4%.

Results: The mean MRI image quality score was significantly higher in the LMA group than in the control group (26.10 ± 3.97 versus 18.60 ± 5.30, P < 0.001). Mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate were significantly lower in the LMA group than in the control group at all study times except at baseline and immediate post-extubation (P < 0.05). Cough was significantly lower in LMA than in the control group (15% vs. 50%, P = 0.040). Airway complications (sore throat, laryngeal spasm, and bronchospasm), nausea, and vomiting did not have a significantly different between the two groups.

Conclusions: Compared to Guedel oral airway, using LMA for airway management in pediatrics undergoing MRI scans improved the image quality with less cough and better hemodynamics.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

喉罩气道对儿童脑磁共振成像图像质量的影响:一项随机对照试验。
背景:磁共振成像(MRI)对运动高度敏感,导致伪影和降低图像质量。喉罩气道(LMA)与气管内插管相比有许多优点,因为它可以减少喉痉挛、咳嗽和术后去饱和的风险。目的:我们的目的是比较LMA与口腔气道在脑MRI期间气道管理方面减少运动伪影,从而提高图像质量。方法:对40名年龄在1 ~ 18岁、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况І和П的儿童进行随机、对照、双盲试验。将患者按气道方法随机分为对照组(Guedel口腔气道)组和LMA组。配伍麻醉机供氧,七氟醚2% - 4%。结果:LMA组MRI图像质量平均评分明显高于对照组(26.10±3.97比18.60±5.30,P < 0.001)。除基线和拔管后即刻外,LMA组的平均动脉血压和心率在所有研究时间均显著低于对照组(P < 0.05)。LMA组咳嗽明显低于对照组(15% vs. 50%, P = 0.040)。气道并发症(喉咙痛、喉痉挛和支气管痉挛)、恶心和呕吐在两组间无显著差异。结论:与Guedel口腔气道相比,在接受MRI扫描的儿科患者中,使用LMA进行气道管理可以改善图像质量,减少咳嗽,改善血流动力学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信