Quantification of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi root colonization in wheat, tomato, and leek using absolute qPCR.

IF 3.3 2区 生物学 Q2 MYCOLOGY
Mycorrhiza Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-30 DOI:10.1007/s00572-023-01122-8
Andrea Corona Ramírez, Sarah Symanczik, Tabea Gallusser, Natacha Bodenhausen
{"title":"Quantification of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi root colonization in wheat, tomato, and leek using absolute qPCR.","authors":"Andrea Corona Ramírez, Sarah Symanczik, Tabea Gallusser, Natacha Bodenhausen","doi":"10.1007/s00572-023-01122-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) form symbioses with most terrestrial plants and are known to have a positive effect on plant growth and health. Different methodologies have been developed to assess the AMF-plant symbiosis. The most applied method, which involves staining of roots and microscopic observation of the AMF structures, is tedious and time-consuming and the results are highly dependent on the observer. Using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) to quantify AMF root colonization represents a reliable, high-throughput technique that allows the assessment of numerous samples. Quantification with qPCR can be performed through two methods: relative quantification and absolute quantification. In relative quantification, the target gene is normalized with a reference gene. On the other hand, absolute quantification involves the use of a standard curve, for which template DNA is serially diluted. In a previous paper, we validated the primer pair AMG1F and AM1 for a relative quantification approach to assess AMF root colonization in Petunia. Here, we tested the same primers with an absolute quantification approach and compared the results with the traditional microscopy method. We evaluated the qPCR method with three different crops, namely, wheat (cv. Colmetta and Wiwa), tomato, and leek. We observed a strong correlation between microscopy and qPCR for Colmetta (r = 0.90, p < 0.001), Wiwa (r = 0.94, p < 0.001), and tomato (r = 0.93, p < 0.001), but no correlation for leek (r = 0.27, p = 0.268). This highlights the importance of testing the primer pair for each specific crop.</p>","PeriodicalId":18965,"journal":{"name":"Mycorrhiza","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10752845/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mycorrhiza","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-023-01122-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MYCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) form symbioses with most terrestrial plants and are known to have a positive effect on plant growth and health. Different methodologies have been developed to assess the AMF-plant symbiosis. The most applied method, which involves staining of roots and microscopic observation of the AMF structures, is tedious and time-consuming and the results are highly dependent on the observer. Using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) to quantify AMF root colonization represents a reliable, high-throughput technique that allows the assessment of numerous samples. Quantification with qPCR can be performed through two methods: relative quantification and absolute quantification. In relative quantification, the target gene is normalized with a reference gene. On the other hand, absolute quantification involves the use of a standard curve, for which template DNA is serially diluted. In a previous paper, we validated the primer pair AMG1F and AM1 for a relative quantification approach to assess AMF root colonization in Petunia. Here, we tested the same primers with an absolute quantification approach and compared the results with the traditional microscopy method. We evaluated the qPCR method with three different crops, namely, wheat (cv. Colmetta and Wiwa), tomato, and leek. We observed a strong correlation between microscopy and qPCR for Colmetta (r = 0.90, p < 0.001), Wiwa (r = 0.94, p < 0.001), and tomato (r = 0.93, p < 0.001), but no correlation for leek (r = 0.27, p = 0.268). This highlights the importance of testing the primer pair for each specific crop.

Abstract Image

利用绝对 qPCR 对小麦、番茄和韭菜中的丛枝菌根真菌根定植进行定量。
丛枝菌根真菌(AMF)与大多数陆生植物形成共生关系,对植物的生长和健康有积极影响。目前已开发出不同的方法来评估 AMF 与植物的共生关系。最常用的方法是对根部进行染色并用显微镜观察 AMF 结构,但这种方法既繁琐又耗时,而且结果在很大程度上取决于观察者。使用定量聚合酶链式反应(qPCR)来量化 AMF 根部定殖是一种可靠、高通量的技术,可对大量样本进行评估。qPCR 定量有两种方法:相对定量和绝对定量。在相对定量中,目标基因与参考基因进行归一化。另一方面,绝对定量需要使用标准曲线,对模板 DNA 进行连续稀释。在之前的一篇论文中,我们验证了引物对 AMG1F 和 AM1 的相对定量方法,以评估矮牵牛中 AMF 的根定植情况。在这里,我们用绝对定量法测试了相同的引物,并将结果与传统的显微镜方法进行了比较。我们用三种不同的作物,即小麦(Colmetta 和 Wiwa 栽培品种)、番茄和韭菜,对 qPCR 方法进行了评估。在 Colmetta 中,我们观察到显微镜和 qPCR 之间存在很强的相关性(r = 0.90,p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mycorrhiza
Mycorrhiza 生物-真菌学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
40
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mycorrhiza is an international journal devoted to research into mycorrhizas - the widest symbioses in nature, involving plants and a range of soil fungi world-wide. The scope of Mycorrhiza covers all aspects of research into mycorrhizas, including molecular biology of the plants and fungi, fungal systematics, development and structure of mycorrhizas, and effects on plant physiology, productivity, reproduction and disease resistance. The scope also includes interactions between mycorrhizal fungi and other soil organisms and effects of mycorrhizas on plant biodiversity and ecosystem structure. Mycorrhiza contains original papers, short notes and review articles, along with commentaries and news items. It forms a platform for new concepts and discussions, and is a basis for a truly international forum of mycorrhizologists from all over the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信