Valence in the eyes: An emotion decoding profile of adults with major depressive disorder and a history of childhood maltreatment

IF 3.2 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Kristine Kahr Nilsson, Signe Nygaard, Simone Ebsen, Ole Karkov Østergård
{"title":"Valence in the eyes: An emotion decoding profile of adults with major depressive disorder and a history of childhood maltreatment","authors":"Kristine Kahr Nilsson,&nbsp;Signe Nygaard,&nbsp;Simone Ebsen,&nbsp;Ole Karkov Østergård","doi":"10.1002/cpp.2899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) and childhood maltreatment have been proposed to constitute a subgroup with worse illness course and outcomes. To elucidate a potential social cognitive vulnerability in this subgroup, this study compared the emotion decoding abilities of MDD patients with and without a history of childhood maltreatment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Participants with a diagnosis of MDD were recruited from nationwide mental health organizations. Emotion decoding abilities were assessed using the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test, while childhood maltreatment was measured with the Adverse Childhood Experiences Questionnaire.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The MDD patients with a history of childhood maltreatment exhibited poorer emotion decoding abilities than MDD patients without such past. This difference applied specifically to the decoding of positive and negative emotions, while no group differences emerged for the decoding of neutral emotions. When specific maltreatment types were considered as predictors only emotional neglect was associated with lower emotion decoding abilities. These associations remained when adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>By indicating that emotion decoding difficulties characterize the MDD subgroup with childhood maltreatment, the findings highlight a potential vulnerability that merits further examination in terms of its developmental antecedents and prognostic relevance.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpp.2899","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.2899","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) and childhood maltreatment have been proposed to constitute a subgroup with worse illness course and outcomes. To elucidate a potential social cognitive vulnerability in this subgroup, this study compared the emotion decoding abilities of MDD patients with and without a history of childhood maltreatment.

Methods

Participants with a diagnosis of MDD were recruited from nationwide mental health organizations. Emotion decoding abilities were assessed using the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test, while childhood maltreatment was measured with the Adverse Childhood Experiences Questionnaire.

Results

The MDD patients with a history of childhood maltreatment exhibited poorer emotion decoding abilities than MDD patients without such past. This difference applied specifically to the decoding of positive and negative emotions, while no group differences emerged for the decoding of neutral emotions. When specific maltreatment types were considered as predictors only emotional neglect was associated with lower emotion decoding abilities. These associations remained when adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates.

Conclusions

By indicating that emotion decoding difficulties characterize the MDD subgroup with childhood maltreatment, the findings highlight a potential vulnerability that merits further examination in terms of its developmental antecedents and prognostic relevance.

Abstract Image

眼中的价值有严重抑郁障碍和童年虐待史的成年人的情绪解码概况
研究背景 有人认为,患有重度抑郁障碍(MDD)且童年遭受过虐待的人构成了一个亚群体,他们的病程和预后都较差。为了阐明该亚群潜在的社会认知脆弱性,本研究比较了有和没有童年虐待史的重度抑郁症患者的情绪解码能力。 方法 从全国范围内的精神卫生机构招募被诊断为 MDD 的参与者。情绪解码能力通过 "读心术测试 "进行评估,童年虐待则通过 "童年不良经历问卷 "进行测量。 结果 与无虐待史的 MDD 患者相比,有虐待史的 MDD 患者的情绪解码能力更差。这种差异具体体现在对积极和消极情绪的解码能力上,而对中性情绪的解码能力则没有出现群体差异。如果将特定的虐待类型视为预测因素,只有情感忽视与较低的情绪解码能力相关。在对人口统计学和临床协变量进行调整后,这些关联依然存在。 结论 这些研究结果表明,情绪解码困难是患有儿童虐待症的 MDD 亚组的特征,从而凸显了一种潜在的脆弱性,值得进一步研究其发展前因和预后相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy aims to keep clinical psychologists and psychotherapists up to date with new developments in their fields. The Journal will provide an integrative impetus both between theory and practice and between different orientations within clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy will be a forum in which practitioners can present their wealth of expertise and innovations in order to make these available to a wider audience. Equally, the Journal will contain reports from researchers who want to address a larger clinical audience with clinically relevant issues and clinically valid research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信