Energy use efficiency of soil microorganisms: Driven by carbon recycling and reduction

IF 12 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Chaoqun Wang, Yakov Kuzyakov
{"title":"Energy use efficiency of soil microorganisms: Driven by carbon recycling and reduction","authors":"Chaoqun Wang,&nbsp;Yakov Kuzyakov","doi":"10.1111/gcb.16925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Carbon use efficiency (CUE) is being intensively applied to quantify carbon (C) cycling processes from microbial cell to global scales. Energy use efficiency (EUE) is at least as important as the CUE because (i) microorganisms use organic C mainly as an energy source and not as elemental C per se, and (ii) microbial growth and maintenance are limited by energy, but not by C as a structural element. We conceptualize and review the importance of EUE by soil microorganisms and focus on (i) the energy content in organic compounds depending on the nominal oxidation state of carbon (NOSC), (ii) approaches to assess EUE, (iii) similarities and differences between CUE and EUE, and (iv) discuss mechanisms responsible for lower EUE compared to CUE. The energy content per C atom (enthalpy of combustion, the total energy stored in a compound) in organic compounds is very closely (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.98) positively related to NOSC and increases by 108 kJ mol<sup>−1</sup> C per one NOSC unit. For the first time we assessed the NOSC of microbial biomass in soil (−0.52) and calculated the corresponding energy content of −510 kJ mol<sup>−1</sup> C. We linked CUE and EUE considering the NOSC of microbial biomass and element compositions of substrates utilized by microorganisms. The mean microbial EUE (0.32–0.35) is 18% lower than CUE (0.41) using glucose as a substrate. This definitely indicates that microbial growth is limited by energy relative to C. Based on the comparison of a broad range of processes of C and energy utilization for cell growth and maintenance, as well as database of experimental CUE from various compounds, we clearly explained five mechanisms and main factors why EUE is lower than CUE. The two main mechanisms behind lower EUE versus CUE are: (i) microbial recycling: C can be microbially recycled, whereas energy is always utilized only once, and (ii) chemical reduction of organic and inorganic compounds: Energy is used for reduction, which is ongoing without C utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":175,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology","volume":"29 22","pages":"6170-6187"},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcb.16925","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.16925","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Carbon use efficiency (CUE) is being intensively applied to quantify carbon (C) cycling processes from microbial cell to global scales. Energy use efficiency (EUE) is at least as important as the CUE because (i) microorganisms use organic C mainly as an energy source and not as elemental C per se, and (ii) microbial growth and maintenance are limited by energy, but not by C as a structural element. We conceptualize and review the importance of EUE by soil microorganisms and focus on (i) the energy content in organic compounds depending on the nominal oxidation state of carbon (NOSC), (ii) approaches to assess EUE, (iii) similarities and differences between CUE and EUE, and (iv) discuss mechanisms responsible for lower EUE compared to CUE. The energy content per C atom (enthalpy of combustion, the total energy stored in a compound) in organic compounds is very closely (R2 = 0.98) positively related to NOSC and increases by 108 kJ mol−1 C per one NOSC unit. For the first time we assessed the NOSC of microbial biomass in soil (−0.52) and calculated the corresponding energy content of −510 kJ mol−1 C. We linked CUE and EUE considering the NOSC of microbial biomass and element compositions of substrates utilized by microorganisms. The mean microbial EUE (0.32–0.35) is 18% lower than CUE (0.41) using glucose as a substrate. This definitely indicates that microbial growth is limited by energy relative to C. Based on the comparison of a broad range of processes of C and energy utilization for cell growth and maintenance, as well as database of experimental CUE from various compounds, we clearly explained five mechanisms and main factors why EUE is lower than CUE. The two main mechanisms behind lower EUE versus CUE are: (i) microbial recycling: C can be microbially recycled, whereas energy is always utilized only once, and (ii) chemical reduction of organic and inorganic compounds: Energy is used for reduction, which is ongoing without C utilization.

Abstract Image

土壤微生物的能源利用效率:由碳循环和减少驱动
碳利用效率(CUE)正被广泛应用于量化从微生物细胞到全球范围的碳循环过程。能量利用效率(EUE)至少与CUE一样重要,因为(i)微生物主要使用有机碳作为能源,而不是元素C本身,以及(ii)微生物的生长和维持受到能量的限制,但不受C作为结构元素的限制。我们对土壤微生物的EUE的重要性进行了概念化和回顾,并重点关注(i)有机化合物中的能量含量取决于碳的标称氧化态(NOSC),(ii)评估EUE的方法,(iii)CUE和EUE之间的相似性和差异,以及(iv)讨论与CUE相比导致较低EUE的机制。有机化合物中每个C原子的能量含量(燃烧焓,化合物中储存的总能量)非常接近(R2 = 0.98)与NOSC呈正相关,并增加了108 kJ mol−1 C/一个NOSC单位。我们首次评估了土壤中微生物生物量的NOSC(−0.52),并计算出相应的能量含量−510 kJ mol−1 C.考虑到微生物生物量的NOSC和微生物利用的底物的元素组成,我们将CUE和EUE联系起来。使用葡萄糖作为底物的平均微生物EUE(0.32–0.35)比CUE(0.41)低18%。这明确表明,相对于C,微生物的生长受到能量的限制。基于对C的广泛过程和细胞生长和维持的能量利用的比较,以及各种化合物的实验CUE数据库,我们清楚地解释了EUE低于CUE的五种机制和主要因素。与CUE相比,较低的EUE背后的两个主要机制是:(i)微生物循环:碳可以被微生物循环,而能量总是只利用一次,以及(ii)有机和无机化合物的化学还原:能量用于还原,这在没有碳利用的情况下是持续的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Change Biology
Global Change Biology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
21.50
自引率
5.20%
发文量
497
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Global Change Biology is an environmental change journal committed to shaping the future and addressing the world's most pressing challenges, including sustainability, climate change, environmental protection, food and water safety, and global health. Dedicated to fostering a profound understanding of the impacts of global change on biological systems and offering innovative solutions, the journal publishes a diverse range of content, including primary research articles, technical advances, research reviews, reports, opinions, perspectives, commentaries, and letters. Starting with the 2024 volume, Global Change Biology will transition to an online-only format, enhancing accessibility and contributing to the evolution of scholarly communication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信