Method validation of multi-element panel in whole blood by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS)

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Amol O. Bajaj , Rebecca Parker , Candice Farnsworth , Christian Law , Kamisha L. Johnson-Davis
{"title":"Method validation of multi-element panel in whole blood by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS)","authors":"Amol O. Bajaj ,&nbsp;Rebecca Parker ,&nbsp;Candice Farnsworth ,&nbsp;Christian Law ,&nbsp;Kamisha L. Johnson-Davis","doi":"10.1016/j.jmsacl.2022.12.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Analytical methods to measure trace and toxic elements are essential to evaluate exposure and nutritional status. A ten-element panel was developed and validated for clinical testing in whole blood. Retrospective data analysis was conducted on patient samples performed at ARUP Laboratories.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A method was developed and validated to quantify ten elements in whole blood by ICP-MS. Fifty microliters of sample were extracted with 950 μL of diluent containing 1 % ammonium hydroxide, 0.1 % Triton X-100, 1.75 % EDTA along with spiked internal standards. Four calibrators were used for each element and prepared in goat blood to match the patient specimen matrix. Samples were analyzed with an Agilent 7700 ICP-MS with a Cetac MVX 7100 μL Workstation autosampler.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The assay was linear for all elements with inter- and intra-assay imprecision less than or equal to 11% CV at the low end of the analytical measurement range (AMR) and less than or equal to 4% CV at the upper end of the AMR for all elements. Accuracy was checked with a minimum of 40 repeat patient samples, proficiency testing samples, and matrix-matched spikes. The linear slopes for the ten elements ranged from 0.94 to 1.03 with intercepts below the AMR and R<sup>2</sup> ranging from 0.97 to 1.00.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The multi-element panel was developed to analyze ten elements in whole blood to unify the sample preparation and increase batch run efficiency. The improved analytical method utilized matrix-matched calibrators for accurate quantification to meet regulatory requirements. The assay was validated according to guidelines for CLIA-certified clinical laboratories and was suitable for clinical testing to assess nutritional status and toxic exposure.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52406,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab","volume":"27 ","pages":"Pages 33-39"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/65/ac/main.PMC9803809.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667145X22000475","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background

Analytical methods to measure trace and toxic elements are essential to evaluate exposure and nutritional status. A ten-element panel was developed and validated for clinical testing in whole blood. Retrospective data analysis was conducted on patient samples performed at ARUP Laboratories.

Methods

A method was developed and validated to quantify ten elements in whole blood by ICP-MS. Fifty microliters of sample were extracted with 950 μL of diluent containing 1 % ammonium hydroxide, 0.1 % Triton X-100, 1.75 % EDTA along with spiked internal standards. Four calibrators were used for each element and prepared in goat blood to match the patient specimen matrix. Samples were analyzed with an Agilent 7700 ICP-MS with a Cetac MVX 7100 μL Workstation autosampler.

Results

The assay was linear for all elements with inter- and intra-assay imprecision less than or equal to 11% CV at the low end of the analytical measurement range (AMR) and less than or equal to 4% CV at the upper end of the AMR for all elements. Accuracy was checked with a minimum of 40 repeat patient samples, proficiency testing samples, and matrix-matched spikes. The linear slopes for the ten elements ranged from 0.94 to 1.03 with intercepts below the AMR and R2 ranging from 0.97 to 1.00.

Conclusions

The multi-element panel was developed to analyze ten elements in whole blood to unify the sample preparation and increase batch run efficiency. The improved analytical method utilized matrix-matched calibrators for accurate quantification to meet regulatory requirements. The assay was validated according to guidelines for CLIA-certified clinical laboratories and was suitable for clinical testing to assess nutritional status and toxic exposure.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

电感耦合等离子体质谱(ICP-MS)测定全血中多元素板的方法验证
背景测量微量元素和有毒元素的分析方法对于评估接触和营养状况至关重要。开发并验证了一个用于全血临床测试的十元素面板。对ARUP实验室的患者样本进行了回顾性数据分析。方法开发并验证了一种通过ICP-MS定量全血中十种元素的方法。用950μL含有1%氢氧化铵、0.1%Triton X-100、1.75%EDTA的稀释剂以及加标的内标物提取50微升样品。每个元素使用四个校准器,并在山羊血中制备,以匹配患者样本基质。使用Agilent 7700 ICP-MS和Cetac MVX 7100μL工作站自动进样器对样品进行分析。结果所有元素的测定都是线性的,在分析测量范围(AMR)的低端,测定间和测定内的不精确性小于或等于11%CV,在AMR的高端,所有元素的不精确度小于或等于4%CV。使用至少40个重复患者样本、能力测试样本和矩阵匹配的尖峰来检查准确性。10种元素的线性斜率在0.94至1.03之间,AMR和R2以下的截距在0.97至1.00之间。结论开发了多元素面板来分析全血中的10种元素,以统一样品制备并提高批量运行效率。改进的分析方法利用矩阵匹配的校准器进行精确定量,以满足监管要求。该测定根据CLIA认证的临床实验室指南进行了验证,适用于评估营养状况和毒性暴露的临床测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab
Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
41
审稿时长
81 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信