Clinical utility of self- and informant-reported memory, attention, and spatial navigation in detecting biomarkers associated with Alzheimer disease in clinically normal adults.

IF 2.6 4区 心理学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Taylor F Levine, Samantha L Allison, Steven J Dessenberger, Denise Head
{"title":"Clinical utility of self- and informant-reported memory, attention, and spatial navigation in detecting biomarkers associated with Alzheimer disease in clinically normal adults.","authors":"Taylor F Levine, Samantha L Allison, Steven J Dessenberger, Denise Head","doi":"10.1017/S1355617723000528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Preclinical Alzheimer disease (AD) has been associated with subtle changes in memory, attention, and spatial navigation abilities. The current study examined whether self- and informant-reported domain-specific cognitive changes are sensitive to AD-associated biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Clinically normal adults aged 56-93 and their informants completed the memory, divided attention, and visuospatial abilities (which assesses spatial navigation) subsections of the Everyday Cognition Scale (ECog). Reliability and validity of these subsections were examined using Cronbach's alpha and confirmatory factor analysis. Logistic regression was used to examine the ability of ECog subsections to predict AD-related biomarkers (cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) ptau<sub>181</sub>/Aβ<sub>42</sub> ratio (<i>N</i> = 371) or hippocampal volume (<i>N</i> = 313)). Hierarchical logistic regression was used to examine whether the self-reported subsections continued to predict biomarkers when controlling for depressive symptomatology if available (<i>N</i> = 197). Additionally, logistic regression was used to examine the ability of neuropsychological composites assessing the same or similar cognitive domains as the subsections (memory, executive function, and visuospatial abilities) to predict biomarkers to allow for comparison of the predictive ability of subjective and objective measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All subsections demonstrated appropriate reliability and validity. Self-reported memory (with outliers removed) was the only significant predictor of AD biomarker positivity (i.e., CSF ptau<sub>181</sub>/Aβ<sub>42</sub> ratio; <i>p</i> = .018) but was not significant when examined in the subsample with depressive symptomatology available (<i>p</i> = .517). Self-reported memory (with outliers removed) was a significant predictor of CSF ptau<sub>181</sub>/Aβ<sub>42</sub> ratio biomarker positivity when the objective memory composite was included in the model.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ECog subsections were not robust predictors of AD biomarker positivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":49995,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","volume":" ","pages":"232-243"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617723000528","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Preclinical Alzheimer disease (AD) has been associated with subtle changes in memory, attention, and spatial navigation abilities. The current study examined whether self- and informant-reported domain-specific cognitive changes are sensitive to AD-associated biomarkers.

Method: Clinically normal adults aged 56-93 and their informants completed the memory, divided attention, and visuospatial abilities (which assesses spatial navigation) subsections of the Everyday Cognition Scale (ECog). Reliability and validity of these subsections were examined using Cronbach's alpha and confirmatory factor analysis. Logistic regression was used to examine the ability of ECog subsections to predict AD-related biomarkers (cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) ptau181/Aβ42 ratio (N = 371) or hippocampal volume (N = 313)). Hierarchical logistic regression was used to examine whether the self-reported subsections continued to predict biomarkers when controlling for depressive symptomatology if available (N = 197). Additionally, logistic regression was used to examine the ability of neuropsychological composites assessing the same or similar cognitive domains as the subsections (memory, executive function, and visuospatial abilities) to predict biomarkers to allow for comparison of the predictive ability of subjective and objective measures.

Results: All subsections demonstrated appropriate reliability and validity. Self-reported memory (with outliers removed) was the only significant predictor of AD biomarker positivity (i.e., CSF ptau181/Aβ42 ratio; p = .018) but was not significant when examined in the subsample with depressive symptomatology available (p = .517). Self-reported memory (with outliers removed) was a significant predictor of CSF ptau181/Aβ42 ratio biomarker positivity when the objective memory composite was included in the model.

Conclusions: ECog subsections were not robust predictors of AD biomarker positivity.

自我报告和信息报告的记忆力、注意力和空间导航在检测临床正常成人阿尔茨海默病相关生物标记物方面的临床实用性。
目的:临床前阿尔茨海默病(AD)与记忆力、注意力和空间导航能力的细微变化有关。本研究探讨了自我报告和信息提供者报告的特定领域认知变化是否对阿兹海默症相关生物标志物敏感:方法:年龄在 56-93 岁之间、临床表现正常的成年人及其信息提供者完成了日常认知量表(ECog)中的记忆、注意力分散和视觉空间能力(评估空间导航能力)部分。采用克朗巴赫α和确认性因子分析对这些分项的信度和效度进行了检验。逻辑回归用于检验日常认知量表(ECog)各分项预测AD相关生物标志物(脑脊液(CSF)ptau181/Aβ42比值(371人)或海马体积(313人))的能力。在控制抑郁症状的情况下,分层逻辑回归用于检验自我报告的分项是否能继续预测生物标志物(N = 197)。此外,我们还使用逻辑回归法检验了评估与分项相同或相似认知领域(记忆力、执行功能和视觉空间能力)的神经心理学复合方法预测生物标志物的能力,以便比较主观和客观测量的预测能力:结果:所有分项均显示出适当的可靠性和有效性。自我报告的记忆(剔除异常值后)是AD生物标志物阳性(即CSF ptau181/Aβ42比值;p = .018)的唯一显著预测指标,但在有抑郁症状的子样本中,自我报告的记忆并不显著(p = .517)。当客观记忆综合指标被纳入模型时,自我报告的记忆(去除异常值)对 CSF ptau181/Aβ42 比值生物标志物阳性有显著预测作用:ECog各分节并不是预测AD生物标志物阳性的可靠指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
185
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society is the official journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, an organization of over 4,500 international members from a variety of disciplines. The Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society welcomes original, creative, high quality research papers covering all areas of neuropsychology. The focus of articles may be primarily experimental, applied, or clinical. Contributions will broadly reflect the interest of all areas of neuropsychology, including but not limited to: development of cognitive processes, brain-behavior relationships, adult and pediatric neuropsychology, neurobehavioral syndromes (such as aphasia or apraxia), and the interfaces of neuropsychology with related areas such as behavioral neurology, neuropsychiatry, genetics, and cognitive neuroscience. Papers that utilize behavioral, neuroimaging, and electrophysiological measures are appropriate. To assure maximum flexibility and to promote diverse mechanisms of scholarly communication, the following formats are available in addition to a Regular Research Article: Brief Communication is a shorter research article; Rapid Communication is intended for "fast breaking" new work that does not yet justify a full length article and is placed on a fast review track; Case Report is a theoretically important and unique case study; Critical Review and Short Review are thoughtful considerations of topics of importance to neuropsychology and include meta-analyses; Dialogue provides a forum for publishing two distinct positions on controversial issues in a point-counterpoint format; Special Issue and Special Section consist of several articles linked thematically; Letter to the Editor responds to recent articles published in the Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society; and Book Review, which is considered but is no longer solicited.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信