Using Wearable Cameras to Investigate Health-Related Daily Life Experiences: A Literature Review of Precautions and Risks in Empirical Studies.

IF 2.1 Q2 ETHICS
Laurel E Meyer, Lauren Porter, Meghan E Reilly, Caroline Johnson, Salman Safir, Shelly F Greenfield, Benjamin C Silverman, James I Hudson, Kristin N Javaras
{"title":"Using Wearable Cameras to Investigate Health-Related Daily Life Experiences: A Literature Review of Precautions and Risks in Empirical Studies.","authors":"Laurel E Meyer,&nbsp;Lauren Porter,&nbsp;Meghan E Reilly,&nbsp;Caroline Johnson,&nbsp;Salman Safir,&nbsp;Shelly F Greenfield,&nbsp;Benjamin C Silverman,&nbsp;James I Hudson,&nbsp;Kristin N Javaras","doi":"10.1177/17470161211054021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Automated, wearable cameras can benefit health-related research by capturing accurate and objective information about individuals' daily experiences. However, wearable cameras present unique privacy- and confidentiality-related risks due to the possibility of the images capturing identifying or sensitive information from participants and third parties. Although best practice guidelines for ethical research with wearable cameras have been published, limited information exists on the risks of studies using wearable cameras. The aim of this literature review was to survey risks related to using wearable cameras, and precautions taken to reduce those risks, as reported in empirical research. Forty-five publications, comprising 36 independent studies, were reviewed, and findings revealed that participants' primary concerns with using wearable cameras included physical inconvenience and discomfort in certain situations (e.g., public settings). None of the studies reviewed reported any serious adverse events. Although it is possible that reported findings do not include all risks experienced by participants in research with wearable cameras, our findings suggest a low level of risk to participants. However, it is important that investigators adopt recommended precautions, which can promote autonomy and reduce risks, including participant discomfort.</p>","PeriodicalId":38096,"journal":{"name":"Research Ethics","volume":"18 1","pages":"64-83"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9307222/pdf/nihms-1761547.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161211054021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Automated, wearable cameras can benefit health-related research by capturing accurate and objective information about individuals' daily experiences. However, wearable cameras present unique privacy- and confidentiality-related risks due to the possibility of the images capturing identifying or sensitive information from participants and third parties. Although best practice guidelines for ethical research with wearable cameras have been published, limited information exists on the risks of studies using wearable cameras. The aim of this literature review was to survey risks related to using wearable cameras, and precautions taken to reduce those risks, as reported in empirical research. Forty-five publications, comprising 36 independent studies, were reviewed, and findings revealed that participants' primary concerns with using wearable cameras included physical inconvenience and discomfort in certain situations (e.g., public settings). None of the studies reviewed reported any serious adverse events. Although it is possible that reported findings do not include all risks experienced by participants in research with wearable cameras, our findings suggest a low level of risk to participants. However, it is important that investigators adopt recommended precautions, which can promote autonomy and reduce risks, including participant discomfort.

Abstract Image

使用可穿戴相机调查与健康相关的日常生活体验:实证研究中的预防和风险的文献综述。
自动化的可穿戴相机可以捕捉个人日常经历的准确客观信息,从而有利于健康相关的研究。然而,由于图像可能捕获参与者和第三方的身份或敏感信息,可穿戴相机呈现出独特的隐私和保密相关风险。虽然关于使用可穿戴相机进行伦理研究的最佳实践指南已经发布,但关于使用可穿戴相机进行研究的风险的信息有限。本文献综述的目的是调查与使用可穿戴相机相关的风险,并采取预防措施来降低这些风险,如实证研究报告。我们回顾了45份出版物,包括36项独立研究,研究结果显示,参与者对使用可穿戴相机的主要担忧包括在某些情况下(例如公共场所)身体上的不便和不适。没有研究报告任何严重的不良事件。虽然报告的研究结果可能不包括使用可穿戴相机的参与者所经历的所有风险,但我们的研究结果表明,参与者的风险水平很低。然而,重要的是,研究人员采用推荐的预防措施,这可以促进自主性和减少风险,包括参与者的不适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research Ethics
Research Ethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.80%
发文量
17
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信