Systematic review on primary and secondary genotoxicity of carbon black nanoparticles in mammalian cells and animals

IF 6.4 2区 医学 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Emilio Di Ianni , Nicklas Raun Jacobsen , Ulla Birgitte Vogel , Peter Møller
{"title":"Systematic review on primary and secondary genotoxicity of carbon black nanoparticles in mammalian cells and animals","authors":"Emilio Di Ianni ,&nbsp;Nicklas Raun Jacobsen ,&nbsp;Ulla Birgitte Vogel ,&nbsp;Peter Møller","doi":"10.1016/j.mrrev.2022.108441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Carbon black exposure causes oxidative stress, inflammation and genotoxicity. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the contributions of primary (i.e. direct formation of DNA damage) and secondary genotoxicity (i.e., DNA lesions produced indirectly by inflammation) to the overall level of DNA damage by carbon black. The database is dominated by studies that have measured DNA damage by the comet assay. Cell culture studies indicate a genotoxic action of carbon black, which might be mediated by oxidative stress. Many in vivo studies originate from one laboratory that has investigated the genotoxic effects of Printex 90 in mice by intra-tracheal instillation. Meta-analysis and pooled analysis of these results demonstrate that Printex 90 exposure is associated with a slightly increased level of DNA strand breaks in bronchoalveolar lavage cells and lung tissue. Other types of genotoxic damage have not been investigated as thoroughly as DNA strand breaks, although there is evidence to suggest that carbon black exposure might increase the mutation frequency and cytogenetic endpoints. Stratification of studies according to concurrent inflammation and DNA damage does not indicate that carbon black exposure gives rise to secondary genotoxicity. Even substantial pulmonary inflammation is at best only associated with a weak genotoxic response in lung tissue. In conclusion, the review indicates that nanosized carbon black is a weak genotoxic agent and this effect is more likely to originate from a primary genotoxic mechanism of action, mediated by e.g., oxidative stress, than inflammation-driven (secondary) genotoxicity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49789,"journal":{"name":"Mutation Research-Reviews in Mutation Research","volume":"790 ","pages":"Article 108441"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138357422200031X/pdfft?md5=7aaf9a1bad28f031cdb0e961b8a19d5a&pid=1-s2.0-S138357422200031X-main.pdf","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mutation Research-Reviews in Mutation Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138357422200031X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Carbon black exposure causes oxidative stress, inflammation and genotoxicity. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the contributions of primary (i.e. direct formation of DNA damage) and secondary genotoxicity (i.e., DNA lesions produced indirectly by inflammation) to the overall level of DNA damage by carbon black. The database is dominated by studies that have measured DNA damage by the comet assay. Cell culture studies indicate a genotoxic action of carbon black, which might be mediated by oxidative stress. Many in vivo studies originate from one laboratory that has investigated the genotoxic effects of Printex 90 in mice by intra-tracheal instillation. Meta-analysis and pooled analysis of these results demonstrate that Printex 90 exposure is associated with a slightly increased level of DNA strand breaks in bronchoalveolar lavage cells and lung tissue. Other types of genotoxic damage have not been investigated as thoroughly as DNA strand breaks, although there is evidence to suggest that carbon black exposure might increase the mutation frequency and cytogenetic endpoints. Stratification of studies according to concurrent inflammation and DNA damage does not indicate that carbon black exposure gives rise to secondary genotoxicity. Even substantial pulmonary inflammation is at best only associated with a weak genotoxic response in lung tissue. In conclusion, the review indicates that nanosized carbon black is a weak genotoxic agent and this effect is more likely to originate from a primary genotoxic mechanism of action, mediated by e.g., oxidative stress, than inflammation-driven (secondary) genotoxicity.

纳米炭黑对哺乳动物细胞的初、继发性遗传毒性研究综述
炭黑暴露会引起氧化应激、炎症和遗传毒性。本系统综述的目的是评估原发性(即直接形成DNA损伤)和继发性遗传毒性(即炎症间接产生的DNA损伤)对炭黑DNA损伤总体水平的贡献。该数据库主要是通过彗星测定法测量DNA损伤的研究。细胞培养研究表明炭黑具有遗传毒性作用,这可能是由氧化应激介导的。许多体内研究起源于一个实验室,该实验室通过气管内灌注研究了Printex 90对小鼠的遗传毒性作用。这些结果的荟萃分析和汇总分析表明,Printex 90暴露与支气管肺泡灌洗液细胞和肺组织中DNA链断裂水平略有增加有关。尽管有证据表明炭黑暴露可能会增加突变频率和细胞遗传终点,但其他类型的基因毒性损伤尚未像DNA链断裂那样得到彻底的研究。根据并发炎症和DNA损伤的分层研究并未表明炭黑暴露会引起继发性遗传毒性。即使是严重的肺部炎症,充其量也只与肺组织中的弱基因毒性反应有关。总之,该综述表明,纳米炭黑是一种弱遗传毒性物质,这种作用更可能源于主要的遗传毒性作用机制,如氧化应激介导,而不是炎症驱动的(继发性)遗传毒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.90%
发文量
22
审稿时长
15.7 weeks
期刊介绍: The subject areas of Reviews in Mutation Research encompass the entire spectrum of the science of mutation research and its applications, with particular emphasis on the relationship between mutation and disease. Thus this section will cover advances in human genome research (including evolving technologies for mutation detection and functional genomics) with applications in clinical genetics, gene therapy and health risk assessment for environmental agents of concern.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信