Meperidine-Ketorolac Combination Provides Better Analgesia than Meperidine Alone in Postoperative Patients.

IF 1.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Nelly N Umukoro, Shola S Jamgbadi, Erdoo S Isamade
{"title":"Meperidine-Ketorolac Combination Provides Better Analgesia than Meperidine Alone in Postoperative Patients.","authors":"Nelly N Umukoro, Shola S Jamgbadi, Erdoo S Isamade","doi":"10.3121/cmr.2022.1628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Our study objective was to assess if multi-modal analgesia with meperidine-ketorolac combination provides superior analgesia or reduces opioid requirement following surgery compared to Meperidine alone.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Double-blind randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Postoperative pain control in orthopedic ward after spinal anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) risk I or II (ASA I/II) patients who had lower limb implant surgery (88) at our center from September 2014 to July 2015.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 1 mg/kg of intravenous (IV) meperidine and 30 mg of IV ketorolac (treatment group) or 1 mg/kg of IV meperidine (control group) post-surgery, administered every hour for the first 6 hours during the first 24 hours post-surgery. In addition, patients received intravenous meperidine on an 'as needed basis' during the first 24 hours of the postoperative period.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Outcomes were time-to-first analgesia request postoperatively; cumulative opioid dose in first 24 hours post-surgery; frequency of side effects; and patient satisfaction with pain relief using a Likert scale. Numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores hourly for the first 6 hours, then the 8th, 12th, 16th, 18th and 24th hour post-surgery were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant delay in time of first request for analgesia (460 min vs 225 min; <i>P</i>=0.03) and a reduction in opioid consumption in 24 hours (299 mg vs 325 mg; <i>P</i>=0.01) in the meperidine/ketorolac group compared with the meperidine alone group which were both statistically significant. Patient satisfaction with pain relief was better in the treatment group (<i>P</i>=0.01). Additionally, there were fewer side effects in the treatment group than in the control group but this was not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adding ketorolac to meperidine reduced postoperative pain, reduced patient daily opioid requirement, increased patient satisfaction with pain relief, without increasing the frequency of side effects. Therefore, IV ketorolac addition to opioids may be a reasonable option in multimodal analgesic protocol.</p>","PeriodicalId":47429,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine & Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9544193/pdf/0200133.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine & Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3121/cmr.2022.1628","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Our study objective was to assess if multi-modal analgesia with meperidine-ketorolac combination provides superior analgesia or reduces opioid requirement following surgery compared to Meperidine alone.

Design: Double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Postoperative pain control in orthopedic ward after spinal anesthesia.

Patients: American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) risk I or II (ASA I/II) patients who had lower limb implant surgery (88) at our center from September 2014 to July 2015.

Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 1 mg/kg of intravenous (IV) meperidine and 30 mg of IV ketorolac (treatment group) or 1 mg/kg of IV meperidine (control group) post-surgery, administered every hour for the first 6 hours during the first 24 hours post-surgery. In addition, patients received intravenous meperidine on an 'as needed basis' during the first 24 hours of the postoperative period.

Measurements: Outcomes were time-to-first analgesia request postoperatively; cumulative opioid dose in first 24 hours post-surgery; frequency of side effects; and patient satisfaction with pain relief using a Likert scale. Numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores hourly for the first 6 hours, then the 8th, 12th, 16th, 18th and 24th hour post-surgery were assessed.

Results: There was a significant delay in time of first request for analgesia (460 min vs 225 min; P=0.03) and a reduction in opioid consumption in 24 hours (299 mg vs 325 mg; P=0.01) in the meperidine/ketorolac group compared with the meperidine alone group which were both statistically significant. Patient satisfaction with pain relief was better in the treatment group (P=0.01). Additionally, there were fewer side effects in the treatment group than in the control group but this was not statistically significant.

Conclusions: Adding ketorolac to meperidine reduced postoperative pain, reduced patient daily opioid requirement, increased patient satisfaction with pain relief, without increasing the frequency of side effects. Therefore, IV ketorolac addition to opioids may be a reasonable option in multimodal analgesic protocol.

甲哌啶-酮咯酸复方制剂为术后患者提供的镇痛效果优于单用甲哌啶。
研究背景我们的研究目的是评估与单独使用甲哌啶相比,使用甲哌啶-酮咯酸组合的多模式镇痛是否能提供更好的镇痛效果或减少术后对阿片类药物的需求:双盲随机对照试验:背景:骨科病房脊髓麻醉后的术后疼痛控制:美国麻醉学会(ASA)风险I级或II级(ASA I/II)患者,2014年9月至2015年7月在本中心进行下肢植入手术(88例):随机分配患者在术后接受1 mg/kg 静脉注射(IV)甲哌啶和30 mg IV酮咯酸(治疗组)或1 mg/kg IV甲哌啶(对照组),在术后24小时内的前6小时每小时给药一次。此外,在术后的头 24 小时内,患者还可根据 "需要 "静脉注射甲哌立定:结果:术后首次要求镇痛的时间;术后头 24 小时内阿片类药物的累积剂量;副作用发生频率;以及患者对疼痛缓解的满意度(采用李克特量表)。在术后最初 6 小时,然后在术后第 8、12、16、18 和 24 小时,每小时对数字评分法(NRS)疼痛评分进行评估:结果:与单独使用甲哌啶组相比,甲哌啶/酮咯酸组首次要求镇痛的时间明显推迟(460 分钟 vs 225 分钟;P=0.03),24 小时内阿片类药物的用量明显减少(299 毫克 vs 325 毫克;P=0.01),这两项数据均有统计学意义。治疗组患者对疼痛缓解的满意度更高(P=0.01)。此外,治疗组的副作用少于对照组,但无统计学意义:在甲哌啶基础上加用酮咯酸可减轻术后疼痛,减少患者每日阿片类药物的需求量,提高患者对疼痛缓解的满意度,但不会增加副作用的发生频率。因此,在阿片类药物中添加静脉注射酮咯酸可能是多模式镇痛方案中的一个合理选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Medicine & Research
Clinical Medicine & Research MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Clinical Medicine & Research is a peer reviewed publication of original scientific medical research that is relevant to a broad audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Articles are published quarterly in the following topics: -Medicine -Clinical Research -Evidence-based Medicine -Preventive Medicine -Translational Medicine -Rural Health -Case Reports -Epidemiology -Basic science -History of Medicine -The Art of Medicine -Non-Clinical Aspects of Medicine & Science
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信