Electrocardiogram as a screening tool to exclude chronic systolic heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Danish medical journal Pub Date : 2023-08-09
Roda Abdulkadir Mohamed, Søren Auscher, Thomas Rueskov Andersen, Lars Videbæk, Katrine Schultz Overgaard, Kenneth Egstrup
{"title":"Electrocardiogram as a screening tool to exclude chronic systolic heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction.","authors":"Roda Abdulkadir Mohamed,&nbsp;Søren Auscher,&nbsp;Thomas Rueskov Andersen,&nbsp;Lars Videbæk,&nbsp;Katrine Schultz Overgaard,&nbsp;Kenneth Egstrup","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In recent years, the waiting time for outpatient echocardiography has been increasing. This has potential consequences for patients with de novo systolic heart failure (HF). Thus, screening methods for HF are needed. One method may be electrocardiogram (ECG). We assessed the diagnostic value of the ECG in identifying HF with reduced left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients referred from primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 2020-2021 observational retrospective study was conducted on patients referred from primary care on suspicion of HF. All patients had ECG performed before LVEF was documented by echocardiography.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 248 patients (61.5%) presented with an abnormal ECG. Among these patients, 4.8% had LVEF 41-49% and 7.7% had LVEF ≤ 40%. An abnormal ECG was found to be associated with reduced LVEF. The negative predictive value of the ECG was 99%, regardless of whether the ECG was interpreted by the cardiologist or automatically. Adding the ECG to a logistic model with traditional risk factors, the ECG increased the area under curve from 0.72 to 0.79.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study is the first study to assess the value of automatic ECG interpretation compared with a cardiologist's interpretation. The normal ECG can safely exclude HF with LVEF less-than 50% and may serve as a gatekeeping tool to further assist the primary care physician in identifying patients with de novo systolic HF.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not relevant.</p>","PeriodicalId":11119,"journal":{"name":"Danish medical journal","volume":"70 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In recent years, the waiting time for outpatient echocardiography has been increasing. This has potential consequences for patients with de novo systolic heart failure (HF). Thus, screening methods for HF are needed. One method may be electrocardiogram (ECG). We assessed the diagnostic value of the ECG in identifying HF with reduced left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients referred from primary care.

Methods: A 2020-2021 observational retrospective study was conducted on patients referred from primary care on suspicion of HF. All patients had ECG performed before LVEF was documented by echocardiography.

Results: In total, 248 patients (61.5%) presented with an abnormal ECG. Among these patients, 4.8% had LVEF 41-49% and 7.7% had LVEF ≤ 40%. An abnormal ECG was found to be associated with reduced LVEF. The negative predictive value of the ECG was 99%, regardless of whether the ECG was interpreted by the cardiologist or automatically. Adding the ECG to a logistic model with traditional risk factors, the ECG increased the area under curve from 0.72 to 0.79.

Conclusion: This study is the first study to assess the value of automatic ECG interpretation compared with a cardiologist's interpretation. The normal ECG can safely exclude HF with LVEF less-than 50% and may serve as a gatekeeping tool to further assist the primary care physician in identifying patients with de novo systolic HF.

Funding: None.

Trial registration: Not relevant.

心电图作为排除慢性收缩期心力衰竭伴左室射血分数降低的筛查工具。
导读:近年来,门诊超声心动图的等待时间不断增加。这对新生收缩期心力衰竭(HF)患者有潜在的后果。因此,需要HF的筛选方法。一种方法可能是心电图(ECG)。我们评估了心电图在初级保健转介的HF患者中识别左心室射血分数(LVEF)降低的诊断价值。方法:对疑似心衰的初级保健转诊患者进行2020-2021年观察性回顾性研究。所有患者在超声心动图记录LVEF前均行心电图检查。结果:248例患者(61.5%)出现心电图异常。其中,LVEF为41-49%的占4.8%,LVEF≤40%的占7.7%。发现心电图异常与LVEF降低有关。无论心电图是由心脏科医生解读还是自动解读,其阴性预测值均为99%。将心电图加入具有传统危险因素的logistic模型中,心电图曲线下面积从0.72增加到0.79。结论:本研究是第一个将自动心电图判读与心脏病专家判读进行比较的研究。正常心电图可以安全地排除LVEF小于50%的HF,并可作为一种看门工具,进一步协助初级保健医生识别新生收缩期HF患者。资金:没有。试验注册:不相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Danish medical journal
Danish medical journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
78
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Danish Medical Journal (DMJ) is a general medical journal. The journal publish original research in English – conducted in or in relation to the Danish health-care system. When writing for the Danish Medical Journal please remember target audience which is the general reader. This means that the research area should be relevant to many readers and the paper should be presented in a way that most readers will understand the content. DMJ will publish the following articles: • Original articles • Protocol articles from large randomized clinical trials • Systematic reviews and meta-analyses • PhD theses from Danish faculties of health sciences • DMSc theses from Danish faculties of health sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信