Effect of interfacial surface treatment on bond strength of particulate-filled composite to short fiber-reinforced composite.

L Lassila, J Tuokko, A Suni, S Garoushi, P K Vallittu
{"title":"Effect of interfacial surface treatment on bond strength of particulate-filled composite to short fiber-reinforced composite.","authors":"L Lassila,&nbsp;J Tuokko,&nbsp;A Suni,&nbsp;S Garoushi,&nbsp;P K Vallittu","doi":"10.1080/26415275.2022.2070489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim was to investigate the effect of different interfacial surface treatments on the shear bond strength (SBS) between a short fiber-reinforced flowable composite (SFRC) and a particulate-filled flowable composite (PFC). In addition, SBS between two successive layers of similar materials was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>One-hundred and forty-four specimens were prepared having either SFRC (everX Flow) as a substructure composite and PFC (G-aenial Flo X) as a surface composite or having one of the two materials as both substructure and surface layer. Eight groups of specimens were created (<i>n</i> = 18/per group) according to the interfacial surface protocol used. Group 1: no treatment; Group 2: ethanol one wipe; Group 3: ethanol three wipes; Group 4: phosphoric acid etching + bonding agent; Group 5: hydrofluoric acid etching + bonding agent; and Group 6: grinding + phosphoric acid etching. Group 7: only PFC layers and Group 8 (control) only SFRC layers without any surface treatment. After one-day storage (37 °C), SBS between surface and substructure composite layers was measured in a universal testing machine, and failure modes were visually analyzed. SEM was used to examine the bonding surface of the SFRC composite after surface treatment. SBS values were statistically analyzed with a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Tukey HSD test (α = .05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SBS between successive SFRC layers (Group 8) was statistically (<i>p</i> < .05) the highest (43.7 MPa) among tested groups. Surface roughening by grinding followed by phosphoric acid etching (Group 6) resulted in a higher SBS (28.8 MPa) than the remaining surface treatments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Flowable composite with glass fibers (everX Flow) showed higher interlayer SBS compared to PFC flowable composite. Interfacial surface roughness increases the bonding of PFC to the substructure of SFRC.</p>","PeriodicalId":72378,"journal":{"name":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","volume":"9 1","pages":"33-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9090340/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2022.2070489","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective: The aim was to investigate the effect of different interfacial surface treatments on the shear bond strength (SBS) between a short fiber-reinforced flowable composite (SFRC) and a particulate-filled flowable composite (PFC). In addition, SBS between two successive layers of similar materials was evaluated.

Materials and methods: One-hundred and forty-four specimens were prepared having either SFRC (everX Flow) as a substructure composite and PFC (G-aenial Flo X) as a surface composite or having one of the two materials as both substructure and surface layer. Eight groups of specimens were created (n = 18/per group) according to the interfacial surface protocol used. Group 1: no treatment; Group 2: ethanol one wipe; Group 3: ethanol three wipes; Group 4: phosphoric acid etching + bonding agent; Group 5: hydrofluoric acid etching + bonding agent; and Group 6: grinding + phosphoric acid etching. Group 7: only PFC layers and Group 8 (control) only SFRC layers without any surface treatment. After one-day storage (37 °C), SBS between surface and substructure composite layers was measured in a universal testing machine, and failure modes were visually analyzed. SEM was used to examine the bonding surface of the SFRC composite after surface treatment. SBS values were statistically analyzed with a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Tukey HSD test (α = .05).

Results: The SBS between successive SFRC layers (Group 8) was statistically (p < .05) the highest (43.7 MPa) among tested groups. Surface roughening by grinding followed by phosphoric acid etching (Group 6) resulted in a higher SBS (28.8 MPa) than the remaining surface treatments.

Conclusion: Flowable composite with glass fibers (everX Flow) showed higher interlayer SBS compared to PFC flowable composite. Interfacial surface roughness increases the bonding of PFC to the substructure of SFRC.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

界面表面处理对颗粒填充复合材料与短纤维增强复合材料结合强度的影响。
目的:研究不同界面表面处理对短纤维增强可流动复合材料(SFRC)和颗粒填充可流动复合材料(PFC)剪切结合强度(SBS)的影响。此外,还对相似材料连续两层之间的SBS进行了评价。材料和方法:制备了144个样品,其中SFRC (everX Flow)作为子结构复合材料,PFC (g - enial Flo X)作为表面复合材料,或者两种材料中的一种同时作为子结构和表面层。根据使用的界面面方案制作8组标本(n = 18/每组)。第一组:不治疗;第二组:乙醇一次擦拭;第三组:乙醇三湿巾;第4组:磷酸蚀刻+粘结剂;第5组:氢氟酸蚀刻+粘结剂;第6组:研磨+磷酸蚀刻。第7组:仅PFC层,第8组(对照组)仅SFRC层,不进行任何表面处理。37°C贮存1天后,在通用试验机上测量表面和子结构复合材料层之间的SBS,并可视化分析失效模式。采用扫描电镜对表面处理后的SFRC复合材料的粘结表面进行了观察。SBS值采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)和Tukey HSD检验(α = 0.05)进行统计学分析。结果:SFRC连续层间(第8组)的SBS具有统计学意义(p)。结论:玻纤可流动复合材料(everX Flow)的层间SBS高于PFC可流动复合材料。界面表面粗糙度增加了PFC与SFRC子结构的结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信