[The significance of educational biography for the professional self-image of GDR psychotherapists].

Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-24 DOI:10.1055/a-2108-4445
Hariet Kirschner, Monika Storch, Agnès Arp, Marie Theresa Kaufmann, Gordana Paripovic, Bernhard Strauß
{"title":"[The significance of educational biography for the professional self-image of GDR psychotherapists].","authors":"Hariet Kirschner, Monika Storch, Agnès Arp, Marie Theresa Kaufmann, Gordana Paripovic, Bernhard Strauß","doi":"10.1055/a-2108-4445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Since the reunification of Germany, a debate on the professional activities of GDR psychotherapists has rised up. This debate is partly conducted by the spirit of coming to terms with the past and partly by legitimizing therapeutic activities in the GDR. The aim of this work is to show in individual patterns the professional self-image of selected GDR psychotherapists. The study focused from a sociological perspective with the intention of differentiating this topic. In course of this, the range of political positioning of GDR psychotherapists will also be determined on a case-by-case basis and it will be shown how this was shaped in the often named \"niche of psychotherapy\".</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on-biographical interviews, educational biographical trajectories of GDR psychotherapists were reconstructed. The interviews were analyzed using grounded theory in a circular process of material selection and theory development. According to the principle of maximum contrast (theoretical sampling), four women were selected for reconstruction from a sample of 39 interviews from the joint project Seelenarbeit im Sozialismus (Soul Work in Socialism) and analyzed using Teifel's (2005) coding guide based on educational theory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within the four cases, extremely individual educational biographies emerge on the levels of the coding strategy (meaning/structure perspective and mode of action), each showing different characteristics with regard to their ability to adopt a reflexive stance and the adoption of professional agency. The cases also show different characteristics with regard to their different positions on the system of GDR.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results of the case reconstructions can be summarized in an overarching scheme. This shows that the role of each individual's educational access, their educational paths and their individual practice of action must be seen in relation to the influence of the political system and the ability to adopt a professional attitude. The psychotherapists of the GDR cannot be understood per se as a group acting subversively against the state.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2108-4445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Since the reunification of Germany, a debate on the professional activities of GDR psychotherapists has rised up. This debate is partly conducted by the spirit of coming to terms with the past and partly by legitimizing therapeutic activities in the GDR. The aim of this work is to show in individual patterns the professional self-image of selected GDR psychotherapists. The study focused from a sociological perspective with the intention of differentiating this topic. In course of this, the range of political positioning of GDR psychotherapists will also be determined on a case-by-case basis and it will be shown how this was shaped in the often named "niche of psychotherapy".

Methods: Based on-biographical interviews, educational biographical trajectories of GDR psychotherapists were reconstructed. The interviews were analyzed using grounded theory in a circular process of material selection and theory development. According to the principle of maximum contrast (theoretical sampling), four women were selected for reconstruction from a sample of 39 interviews from the joint project Seelenarbeit im Sozialismus (Soul Work in Socialism) and analyzed using Teifel's (2005) coding guide based on educational theory.

Results: Within the four cases, extremely individual educational biographies emerge on the levels of the coding strategy (meaning/structure perspective and mode of action), each showing different characteristics with regard to their ability to adopt a reflexive stance and the adoption of professional agency. The cases also show different characteristics with regard to their different positions on the system of GDR.

Discussion: The results of the case reconstructions can be summarized in an overarching scheme. This shows that the role of each individual's educational access, their educational paths and their individual practice of action must be seen in relation to the influence of the political system and the ability to adopt a professional attitude. The psychotherapists of the GDR cannot be understood per se as a group acting subversively against the state.

分享
查看原文
[教育传记对民主德国心理治疗师职业自我形象的意义]。
目的:自德国统一以来,一场关于民主德国心理治疗师职业活动的辩论逐渐兴起。这场辩论的部分原因是为了正视过去,部分原因是为了使民主德国的治疗活动合法化。这项工作的目的是以个人模式展示选定的民主德国心理治疗师的职业自我形象。研究从社会学角度出发,旨在区分这一主题。在此过程中,还将逐一确定民主德国心理治疗师的政治定位范围,并说明这种定位是如何在通常被称为 "心理治疗利基 "的领域中形成的:方法:根据传记访谈,重建民主德国心理治疗师的教育传记轨迹。在材料选择和理论发展的循环过程中,使用基础理论对访谈进行了分析。根据最大反差原则(理论抽样),从 "社会主义中的灵魂工作"(Seelenarbeit im Sozialismus)联合项目的 39 个访谈样本中选取了四名女性进行重建,并使用 Teifel(2005 年)基于教育理论的编码指南进行分析:结果:在四个案例中,在编码策略(意义/结构视角和行动模式)的层面上出现了极具个性的教育传记,每个传记在采取反思立场的能力和专业代理方面都表现出不同的特点。这些案例在对民主德国制度的不同立场上也表现出不同的特点:案例重构的结果可归纳为一个总体方案。这表明,每个人的教育机会、教育途径和个人行动实践的作用必须与政治制度的影响和采取专业态度的能力联系起来看待。东德的心理治疗师本身不能被理解为一个对国家采取颠覆行动的群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信