Implementation of sacral neuromodulation for urinary indications. A Danish prospective study during the initial 15 months of a new service in a tertiary referral hospital.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Hanne Kobberø, Margrethe Andersen, Karin Andersen, Torben Brøchner Pedersen, Mads Hvid Poulsen
{"title":"Implementation of sacral neuromodulation for urinary indications. A Danish prospective study during the initial 15 months of a new service in a tertiary referral hospital.","authors":"Hanne Kobberø,&nbsp;Margrethe Andersen,&nbsp;Karin Andersen,&nbsp;Torben Brøchner Pedersen,&nbsp;Mads Hvid Poulsen","doi":"10.1080/21681805.2022.2120066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is a well-established treatment modality for idiopathic overactive bladder and urgency incontinence, idiopathic fecal incontinence and non-obstructive urinary retention. This study describes the start-up phase of establishing the SNM service. <i>Primary objective:</i> To investigate the patient-reported outcome measures of SNM on lower urinary tract dysfunction symptoms. <i>Secondary objectives</i>: To investigate bowel function, sexual satisfaction and to monitor SNM safety.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty-two patients with refractory idiopathic and neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction were offered a two-stage test-phase procedure and SNM device implantation. On completing the study, the patients rated their satisfaction with the treatment using a five-point Likert scale and a bother score of urinary, bowel and sexual symptoms on a scale of 1-10 (the worst). Their complications were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen patients (86%) were responders during the test phase and had the pulse generator implanted. Seventeen patients were very satisfied/satisfied. A statistically significant change in urinary symptoms bother score was observed in the idiopathic and neurogenic patients, a reduction from 10 to 4 (<i>p</i> = .0057) and 10 to 3 (<i>p</i> = .014), respectively. Eleven patients (58%) had symptoms from two or three pelvic compartments. Nine patients (47%) had complications. All but one event was resolved.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SNM is safe in this heterogeneous group of patients with refractory lower urinary tract dysfunction of various etiologies. A substantial improvement was observed in the pelvic organ dysfunction, demanding a multidisciplinary approach. More studies are required to standardize the evaluation of the subjective and objective outcomes of SNM.</p>","PeriodicalId":21542,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Urology","volume":"56 5-6","pages":"404-411"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21681805.2022.2120066","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is a well-established treatment modality for idiopathic overactive bladder and urgency incontinence, idiopathic fecal incontinence and non-obstructive urinary retention. This study describes the start-up phase of establishing the SNM service. Primary objective: To investigate the patient-reported outcome measures of SNM on lower urinary tract dysfunction symptoms. Secondary objectives: To investigate bowel function, sexual satisfaction and to monitor SNM safety.

Materials and methods: Twenty-two patients with refractory idiopathic and neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction were offered a two-stage test-phase procedure and SNM device implantation. On completing the study, the patients rated their satisfaction with the treatment using a five-point Likert scale and a bother score of urinary, bowel and sexual symptoms on a scale of 1-10 (the worst). Their complications were assessed.

Results: Nineteen patients (86%) were responders during the test phase and had the pulse generator implanted. Seventeen patients were very satisfied/satisfied. A statistically significant change in urinary symptoms bother score was observed in the idiopathic and neurogenic patients, a reduction from 10 to 4 (p = .0057) and 10 to 3 (p = .014), respectively. Eleven patients (58%) had symptoms from two or three pelvic compartments. Nine patients (47%) had complications. All but one event was resolved.

Conclusions: SNM is safe in this heterogeneous group of patients with refractory lower urinary tract dysfunction of various etiologies. A substantial improvement was observed in the pelvic organ dysfunction, demanding a multidisciplinary approach. More studies are required to standardize the evaluation of the subjective and objective outcomes of SNM.

骶神经调节对泌尿指征的实施。丹麦在三级转诊医院新服务最初15个月的前瞻性研究。
目的:骶神经调节(SNM)是一种成熟的治疗特发性膀胱过动症和急迫性尿失禁、特发性大便失禁和非梗阻性尿潴留的方法。本研究描述了建立SNM服务的启动阶段。主要目的:探讨患者报告的SNM治疗下尿路功能障碍症状的结局指标。次要目的:调查肠功能,性满意度和监测SNM的安全性。材料和方法:对22例难治性特发性和神经源性下尿路功能障碍患者进行两阶段试验和SNM装置植入。在完成研究后,患者使用5分李克特量表和尿、肠和性症状的麻烦评分来评定他们对治疗的满意度,评分范围为1-10(最差)。评估其并发症。结果:19例患者(86%)在测试阶段有反应,并植入了脉冲发生器。17个病人非常满意。在特发性和神经源性患者中观察到尿路症状烦扰评分有统计学意义的变化,分别从10分降至4分(p = 0.0057)和从10分降至3分(p = 0.014)。11例患者(58%)有两个或三个盆腔室的症状。9例患者(47%)出现并发症。除了一件事以外,所有的事情都解决了。结论:SNM在不同病因的难治性下尿路功能障碍患者中是安全的。观察到盆腔器官功能障碍有实质性改善,需要多学科方法。对SNM的主客观结果的评价需要更多的研究来规范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Urology
Scandinavian Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Urology is a journal for the clinical urologist and publishes papers within all fields in clinical urology. Experimental papers related to clinical questions are also invited.Important reports with great news value are published promptly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信