Effectiveness of early colonoscopy in patients with colonic diverticular hemorrhage: A single-center retrospective cohort study.

IF 1.4 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Chikamasa Ichita, Sayuri Shimizu, Akiko Sasaki, Chihiro Sumida, Takashi Nishino, Karen Kimura
{"title":"Effectiveness of early colonoscopy in patients with colonic diverticular hemorrhage: A single-center retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Chikamasa Ichita,&nbsp;Sayuri Shimizu,&nbsp;Akiko Sasaki,&nbsp;Chihiro Sumida,&nbsp;Takashi Nishino,&nbsp;Karen Kimura","doi":"10.4253/wjge.v14.i12.759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current guidelines recommend colonoscopy within 24 h for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding; however, the evidence in support for colonic diverticular hemorrhage (CDH) indications remains insufficient.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the effectiveness of early colonoscopy on the length of hospital stay for CDH patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study. Patients who underwent colonoscopy within 24 h of presentation (early group) were compared with those who underwent colonoscopy beyond 24 h of presentation (elective group). The primary outcome was the length of hospital stay, and secondary outcomes were the identification of stigmata of recent hemorrhage (SRH), rebleeding, red blood cell transfusion more than 4 units, and interventional radiology and abdominal surgery after colonoscopy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 574 CDH cases. Patients were divided into the early (<i>n</i> = 328) and elective (<i>n</i> = 226) groups. After propensity score matching, 191 pairs were generated. The length of hospital stay did not significantly differ between the two groups (early group <i>vs</i> elective group; median, 7 <i>vs</i> 8 d; <i>P</i> = 0.10). The early group had a significantly high identification of SRH (risk difference, 11.6%; 95%CI: 2.7 to 20.3; <i>P</i> = 0.02). No significant differences were found in the rebleeding (risk difference, 4.7%; 95%CI: -4.1 to 13.5; <i>P</i> = 0.35), red blood cell transfusion more than 4 units (risk difference, 1.6%; 95%CI: -7.5 to 10.6; <i>P</i> = 0.82), and interventional radiology and abdominal surgery rate after colonoscopy (risk difference, 0.5%; 95%CI: -2.2 to 3.2; <i>P</i> = 1.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early colonoscopy within 24 h, on arrival for CDH, could not improve the length of hospital stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":23953,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":"14 12","pages":"759-768"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/74/3d/WJGE-14-759.PMC9782567.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v14.i12.759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Current guidelines recommend colonoscopy within 24 h for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding; however, the evidence in support for colonic diverticular hemorrhage (CDH) indications remains insufficient.

Aim: To investigate the effectiveness of early colonoscopy on the length of hospital stay for CDH patients.

Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study. Patients who underwent colonoscopy within 24 h of presentation (early group) were compared with those who underwent colonoscopy beyond 24 h of presentation (elective group). The primary outcome was the length of hospital stay, and secondary outcomes were the identification of stigmata of recent hemorrhage (SRH), rebleeding, red blood cell transfusion more than 4 units, and interventional radiology and abdominal surgery after colonoscopy.

Results: We identified 574 CDH cases. Patients were divided into the early (n = 328) and elective (n = 226) groups. After propensity score matching, 191 pairs were generated. The length of hospital stay did not significantly differ between the two groups (early group vs elective group; median, 7 vs 8 d; P = 0.10). The early group had a significantly high identification of SRH (risk difference, 11.6%; 95%CI: 2.7 to 20.3; P = 0.02). No significant differences were found in the rebleeding (risk difference, 4.7%; 95%CI: -4.1 to 13.5; P = 0.35), red blood cell transfusion more than 4 units (risk difference, 1.6%; 95%CI: -7.5 to 10.6; P = 0.82), and interventional radiology and abdominal surgery rate after colonoscopy (risk difference, 0.5%; 95%CI: -2.2 to 3.2; P = 1.00).

Conclusion: Early colonoscopy within 24 h, on arrival for CDH, could not improve the length of hospital stay.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

结肠憩室出血患者早期结肠镜检查的有效性:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。
背景:目前的指南建议急性下消化道出血24小时内进行结肠镜检查;然而,支持结肠憩室出血(CDH)适应症的证据仍然不足。目的:探讨早期结肠镜检查对CDH患者住院时间的影响。方法:我们进行了一项单中心回顾性队列研究。在发病24小时内进行结肠镜检查的患者(早期组)与在发病24小时后进行结肠镜检查的患者(择期组)进行比较。主要观察指标为住院时间,次要观察指标为近期出血污斑(SRH)的识别、再出血、红细胞输注超过4个单位、结肠镜检查后介入影像学检查和腹部手术。结果:我们发现574例CDH病例。患者分为早期组(n = 328)和择期组(n = 226)。倾向得分匹配后,共产生191对。两组住院时间无显著差异(早期组vs择期组;中位数,7 vs 8天;P = 0.10)。早期组有较高的SRH识别率(风险差异为11.6%;95%CI: 2.7 ~ 20.3;P = 0.02)。再出血方面无显著差异(风险差异,4.7%;95%CI: -4.1 ~ 13.5;P = 0.35)、红细胞输注超过4个单位(风险差异为1.6%;95%CI: -7.5 ~ 10.6;P = 0.82),结肠镜检查后介入放射学和腹部手术率(风险差异为0.5%;95%CI: -2.2 ~ 3.2;P = 1.00)。结论:CDH到达24 h内早期结肠镜检查并不能改善住院时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
5.00%
发文量
1164
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信