Institutional analysis of intra- and post-operative tracheostomy management for risk reduction.

Q2 Medicine
Laura E Henry, Ellen A Paul, Joshua H Atkins, Niels D Martin, Ara A Chalian, Christopher H Rassekh
{"title":"Institutional analysis of intra- and post-operative tracheostomy management for risk reduction.","authors":"Laura E Henry, Ellen A Paul, Joshua H Atkins, Niels D Martin, Ara A Chalian, Christopher H Rassekh","doi":"10.1016/j.wjorl.2021.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Determine variability in intra- and post-operative management of tracheostomies (trachs) at our institution as existing literature suggests that trachs are a frequent trigger for airway-related emergencies. Catalyze the development of an institution-wide protocols for trach care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 39-question online survey was sent to 55 providers who perform open and percutaneous trachs at three of the hospitals within our large, urban, academic medical center. These providers were identified by surveillance of the operating room schedules for 1 year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey was completed by 40 of the 53 eligible providers (75.5%). Response rate by question varied. Respondents included members of all departments that perform trachs at our institution (Otorhinolaryngology, Trauma Surgery, Thoracic Surgery, General Surgery, Cardiovascular Surgery and Interventional Pulmonology).While most responses demonstrated uniformity in practice, notable variations included the following: 80% of percutaneous trach providers stated that morbid obesity was not a contraindication to performing a trach outside of the operating room (<i>n</i> = 20) while 58% of open trach providers stated that morbid obesity was a contraindication; only 35% of open trach providers perform a Bjork flap (<i>n</i> = 350). The survey also identified significant variability in practice with regards to timing of trach suture removal.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Lack of uniformity was identified in several practices related to intra- and post-operative tracheostomy care. Results did, however, trend toward consensus in many areas. The results are being used to establish a more consistent approach to tracheostomy management across our institution to ensure standardization of practice amidst the rapidly evolving practices of trach placement.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>With ongoing evolution in the methods of trach placement and its management, the concepts put forth here will be a resource for health care providers at other institutions to consider intra-institutional analysis and establishment of practice standardization.</p>","PeriodicalId":32097,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery","volume":"8 4","pages":"370-377"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0f/20/WJO2-8-370.PMC9714045.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wjorl.2021.02.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Determine variability in intra- and post-operative management of tracheostomies (trachs) at our institution as existing literature suggests that trachs are a frequent trigger for airway-related emergencies. Catalyze the development of an institution-wide protocols for trach care.

Methods: A 39-question online survey was sent to 55 providers who perform open and percutaneous trachs at three of the hospitals within our large, urban, academic medical center. These providers were identified by surveillance of the operating room schedules for 1 year.

Results: The survey was completed by 40 of the 53 eligible providers (75.5%). Response rate by question varied. Respondents included members of all departments that perform trachs at our institution (Otorhinolaryngology, Trauma Surgery, Thoracic Surgery, General Surgery, Cardiovascular Surgery and Interventional Pulmonology).While most responses demonstrated uniformity in practice, notable variations included the following: 80% of percutaneous trach providers stated that morbid obesity was not a contraindication to performing a trach outside of the operating room (n = 20) while 58% of open trach providers stated that morbid obesity was a contraindication; only 35% of open trach providers perform a Bjork flap (n = 350). The survey also identified significant variability in practice with regards to timing of trach suture removal.

Discussion: Lack of uniformity was identified in several practices related to intra- and post-operative tracheostomy care. Results did, however, trend toward consensus in many areas. The results are being used to establish a more consistent approach to tracheostomy management across our institution to ensure standardization of practice amidst the rapidly evolving practices of trach placement.

Implications for practice: With ongoing evolution in the methods of trach placement and its management, the concepts put forth here will be a resource for health care providers at other institutions to consider intra-institutional analysis and establishment of practice standardization.

为降低风险而对术中和术后气管造口管理进行的机构分析。
目的:鉴于现有文献表明气管插管是气道相关急症的常见诱因,确定本机构在气管插管术中和术后管理方面的差异。促进全院范围内气管插管护理规范的制定:我们向本市大型学术医疗中心内三家医院的 55 名实施开放式和经皮气道插管的医疗人员发送了一份包含 39 个问题的在线调查问卷。这些医疗服务提供者是通过对手术室时间表进行为期一年的监控而确定的:53 位符合条件的医疗机构中有 40 位(75.5%)完成了调查。不同问题的回复率各不相同。受访者包括我院所有实施气管插管的科室(耳鼻喉科、创伤外科、胸外科、普通外科、心血管外科和介入肺科)的成员:80%的经皮气管插管提供者表示,病态肥胖不是在手术室外进行气管插管的禁忌症(n = 20),而58%的开放式气管插管提供者表示病态肥胖是禁忌症;只有35%的开放式气管插管提供者会进行Bjork皮瓣(n = 350)。调查还发现,在拆除套管缝线的时机方面,实践中存在很大差异:讨论:调查发现,与术中和术后气管造口护理相关的一些做法缺乏统一性。不过,调查结果表明,在许多方面已达成共识。我们正在利用这些结果在本机构内建立更加一致的气管造口管理方法,以确保在快速发展的气管置管实践中实现实践标准化:实践意义:随着气管插管及其管理方法的不断发展,本文提出的概念将成为其他医疗机构的医疗服务提供者考虑机构内分析和建立实践标准化的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
283
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信