Chinese anatomy educators' perceptions of blended learning in anatomy education: A national survey in the post-COVID-19 era

IF 5.2 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Xin Cheng, Yiru Xu, Hao Tang, Unman Chan, Yun-Qing Li, Xuesong Yang
{"title":"Chinese anatomy educators' perceptions of blended learning in anatomy education: A national survey in the post-COVID-19 era","authors":"Xin Cheng,&nbsp;Yiru Xu,&nbsp;Hao Tang,&nbsp;Unman Chan,&nbsp;Yun-Qing Li,&nbsp;Xuesong Yang","doi":"10.1002/ase.2328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Blended learning, which combines face-to-face lectures with online learning, has emerged as a suitable teaching approach during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study used a national survey of anatomy educators in Mainland China to evaluate the changes in the implementation of blended learning in anatomical pedagogy. A total of 297 responses were collected from medical schools across all provinces. Respondents included 167 males and 130 females, with an average age of 44.94 (±8.28) and average of 17.72 (±9.62) years of professional experience. The survey showed adoption of online teaching and assessment by Chinese anatomy educators increased by 32.7% and 46.8%, respectively, compared to pre-pandemic levels. Perceptions of blended learning outcomes varied, with 32.3% and 37% educators considering it superior and inferior to traditional teaching, respectively. Faculty training programs related to blended learning increased significantly, fostering a collaborative learning environment; however, challenges remained in achieving satisfactory online assessment outcomes. Anatomy educators' attitudes reflected a strong preference for classroom learning (4.941 ± 0.856) and recognition of the importance of relevant technology (4.483 ± 0.954), whereas online learning received lower acceptance (4.078 ± 0.734). Female anatomy teachers demonstrated effective time management in online teaching. Meanwhile, educators with over 15 years of experience encountered difficulties with relevant technology, consistent with negative attitudes toward blended learning. Overall, this survey highlights the persistent challenges in implementing blended learning in anatomy education and provides insights for enhancing the pedagogical model in the post-COVID-19 era.</p>","PeriodicalId":124,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Sciences Education","volume":"17 1","pages":"77-87"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatomical Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ase.2328","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Blended learning, which combines face-to-face lectures with online learning, has emerged as a suitable teaching approach during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study used a national survey of anatomy educators in Mainland China to evaluate the changes in the implementation of blended learning in anatomical pedagogy. A total of 297 responses were collected from medical schools across all provinces. Respondents included 167 males and 130 females, with an average age of 44.94 (±8.28) and average of 17.72 (±9.62) years of professional experience. The survey showed adoption of online teaching and assessment by Chinese anatomy educators increased by 32.7% and 46.8%, respectively, compared to pre-pandemic levels. Perceptions of blended learning outcomes varied, with 32.3% and 37% educators considering it superior and inferior to traditional teaching, respectively. Faculty training programs related to blended learning increased significantly, fostering a collaborative learning environment; however, challenges remained in achieving satisfactory online assessment outcomes. Anatomy educators' attitudes reflected a strong preference for classroom learning (4.941 ± 0.856) and recognition of the importance of relevant technology (4.483 ± 0.954), whereas online learning received lower acceptance (4.078 ± 0.734). Female anatomy teachers demonstrated effective time management in online teaching. Meanwhile, educators with over 15 years of experience encountered difficulties with relevant technology, consistent with negative attitudes toward blended learning. Overall, this survey highlights the persistent challenges in implementing blended learning in anatomy education and provides insights for enhancing the pedagogical model in the post-COVID-19 era.

中国解剖学教育工作者对解剖学教学中混合式学习的看法:后COVID-19时代的全国调查。
在COVID-19大流行期间,将面对面授课与在线学习相结合的混合式学习已成为一种合适的教学方法。本研究对中国大陆的解剖学教育工作者进行了一次全国性调查,以评估在解剖学教学法中实施混合式学习的变化情况。共收集到来自各省医学院校的 297 份回复。受访者中有 167 名男性和 130 名女性,平均年龄为 44.94(±8.28)岁,平均专业经验为 17.72(±9.62)年。调查显示,与大流行前的水平相比,中国解剖学教育工作者采用在线教学和评估的比例分别增加了32.7%和46.8%。对混合式教学成果的看法也不尽相同,分别有32.3%和37%的教育工作者认为混合式教学优于和逊于传统教学。与混合式学习相关的教师培训项目大幅增加,促进了协作式学习环境的形成;然而,在实现令人满意的在线评估结果方面仍存在挑战。解剖学教育工作者的态度反映了他们对课堂学习的强烈偏好(4.941 ± 0.856)和对相关技术重要性的认可(4.483 ± 0.954),而在线学习的接受度较低(4.078 ± 0.734)。女性解剖学教师在在线教学中表现出了有效的时间管理能力。同时,拥有 15 年以上经验的教育工作者在使用相关技术时遇到了困难,这与她们对混合式学习的消极态度是一致的。总之,这项调查强调了在解剖学教育中实施混合式学习所面临的长期挑战,并为在后COVID-19时代改进教学模式提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anatomical Sciences Education
Anatomical Sciences Education Anatomy/education-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
39.70%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Anatomical Sciences Education, affiliated with the American Association for Anatomy, serves as an international platform for sharing ideas, innovations, and research related to education in anatomical sciences. Covering gross anatomy, embryology, histology, and neurosciences, the journal addresses education at various levels, including undergraduate, graduate, post-graduate, allied health, medical (both allopathic and osteopathic), and dental. It fosters collaboration and discussion in the field of anatomical sciences education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信