Monitoring daily symptoms and (self-reported) exacerbations in patients with bronchiectasis: a prospective study.

IF 2 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Jéssica de Campos Medeiros, Ádria Cristina da Silva, Mônica Corso Pereira
{"title":"Monitoring daily symptoms and (self-reported) exacerbations in patients with bronchiectasis: a prospective study.","authors":"Jéssica de Campos Medeiros,&nbsp;Ádria Cristina da Silva,&nbsp;Mônica Corso Pereira","doi":"10.4081/mrm.2022.859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exacerbations are pivotal events in the natural history of patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFB), since they have a negative impact on the functional evolution of these individuals. The daily symptoms of patients with NCFB show great variability, which negatively affects their self-perception of symptoms and exacerbations. The aim of this study was to identify daily symptoms in patients with NCFB, and to investigate whether there is a correlation between the frequency of self-reported exacerbations and events defined according to the criteria established in the literature to define exacerbation in bronchiectasis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational and prospective study was carried out in outpatient clinics of a Brazilian public university hospital. Over 24 weeks, patients completed a diary in which daily symptoms, self-reported exacerbations, and demands for medical care for respiratory symptoms were recorded. The instrument used (diary and symptom scores ranging from 0 to 12) were developed by the researchers. The participants also answered questionnaires mMRC, Leicester's, and St. George's Respiratory (SGRQ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight patients returned the diary, their mean age was 54 years, and 50% out of them were classified as mild by the FACED score. Cough (64%) and expectoration (62%) were the most frequent symptoms. Correlations were found between the stability score and the mMRC (r=0.4727, p=0.011) and SGRQ (r=0.6748, p<0.0001) questionnaires. The number of self-perceived exacerbations (24) was significantly lower than exacerbations using the exacerbation consensus (63) (p<0.01). Additionally, no correlation was found between these two criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was great variability of symptoms among the individuals sampled, and even for the same individual, over time. Patients had low self-perception of exacerbations, which suggests that strategies aimed at improving this self-perception may contribute to the early detection of exacerbations.</p>","PeriodicalId":51135,"journal":{"name":"Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine","volume":"17 1","pages":"859"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b8/9d/mrm-17-1-859.PMC9761409.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/mrm.2022.859","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Exacerbations are pivotal events in the natural history of patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFB), since they have a negative impact on the functional evolution of these individuals. The daily symptoms of patients with NCFB show great variability, which negatively affects their self-perception of symptoms and exacerbations. The aim of this study was to identify daily symptoms in patients with NCFB, and to investigate whether there is a correlation between the frequency of self-reported exacerbations and events defined according to the criteria established in the literature to define exacerbation in bronchiectasis.

Methods: This observational and prospective study was carried out in outpatient clinics of a Brazilian public university hospital. Over 24 weeks, patients completed a diary in which daily symptoms, self-reported exacerbations, and demands for medical care for respiratory symptoms were recorded. The instrument used (diary and symptom scores ranging from 0 to 12) were developed by the researchers. The participants also answered questionnaires mMRC, Leicester's, and St. George's Respiratory (SGRQ).

Results: Twenty-eight patients returned the diary, their mean age was 54 years, and 50% out of them were classified as mild by the FACED score. Cough (64%) and expectoration (62%) were the most frequent symptoms. Correlations were found between the stability score and the mMRC (r=0.4727, p=0.011) and SGRQ (r=0.6748, p<0.0001) questionnaires. The number of self-perceived exacerbations (24) was significantly lower than exacerbations using the exacerbation consensus (63) (p<0.01). Additionally, no correlation was found between these two criteria.

Conclusions: There was great variability of symptoms among the individuals sampled, and even for the same individual, over time. Patients had low self-perception of exacerbations, which suggests that strategies aimed at improving this self-perception may contribute to the early detection of exacerbations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

监测支气管扩张患者的日常症状和(自我报告的)恶化:一项前瞻性研究
背景:急性加重是非囊性纤维化支气管扩张(NCFB)患者自然史中的关键事件,因为它们对这些个体的功能进化有负面影响。NCFB患者的日常症状表现出很大的变异性,这对他们对症状和恶化的自我感知产生了负面影响。本研究的目的是确定NCFB患者的日常症状,并调查自我报告的加重频率与根据文献中建立的定义支气管扩张加重的标准定义的事件之间是否存在相关性。方法:这项观察性和前瞻性研究在巴西公立大学医院的门诊进行。在24周的时间里,患者完成了一份日记,其中记录了日常症状、自我报告的恶化情况以及对呼吸道症状的医疗护理需求。使用的工具(日记和症状评分范围从0到12)是由研究人员开发的。参与者还回答了mMRC、莱斯特和圣乔治呼吸系统问卷(SGRQ)。结果:28例患者归还日记,平均年龄54岁,其中50%的患者按照face评分分为轻度。咳嗽(64%)和咳痰(62%)是最常见的症状。稳定性评分与mMRC (r=0.4727, p=0.011)和SGRQ (r=0.6748, p)之间存在相关性。结论:随着时间的推移,样本个体之间的症状存在很大差异,即使是同一个体。患者对病情恶化的自我知觉较低,这表明旨在改善这种自我知觉的策略可能有助于早期发现病情恶化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine is the official journal of the Italian Respiratory Society - Società Italiana di Pneumologia (IRS/SIP). The journal publishes on all aspects of respiratory medicine and related fields, with a particular focus on interdisciplinary and translational research. The interdisciplinary nature of the journal provides a unique opportunity for researchers, clinicians and healthcare professionals across specialties to collaborate and exchange information. The journal provides a high visibility platform for the publication and dissemination of top quality original scientific articles, reviews and important position papers documenting clinical and experimental advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信