Predicting Poor Outcomes Among Individuals Seeking Care for Major Depressive Disorder.

Joshua N Liberman, Jacqueline Pesa, Pinyao Rui, Amanda Teeple, Susan Lakey, Emily Wiggins, Brian Ahmedani
{"title":"Predicting Poor Outcomes Among Individuals Seeking Care for Major Depressive Disorder.","authors":"Joshua N Liberman,&nbsp;Jacqueline Pesa,&nbsp;Pinyao Rui,&nbsp;Amanda Teeple,&nbsp;Susan Lakey,&nbsp;Emily Wiggins,&nbsp;Brian Ahmedani","doi":"10.1176/appi.prcp.20220011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and validate algorithms to identify individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) at elevated risk for suicidality or for an acute care event.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis among adults with MDD diagnosed between January 1, 2018 and February 28, 2019. Generalized estimating equation models were developed to predict emergency department (ED) visit, inpatient hospitalization, acute care visit (ED or inpatient), partial-day hospitalization, and suicidality in the year following diagnosis. Outcomes (per 1000 patients per month, PkPPM) were categorized as all-cause, psychiatric, or MDD-specific and combined into composite measures. Predictors included demographics, medical and pharmacy utilization, social determinants of health, and comorbid diagnoses as well as features indicative of clinically relevant changes in psychiatric health. Models were trained on data from 1.7M individuals, with sensitivity, positive predictive value, and area-under-the-curve (AUC) derived from a validation dataset of 0.7M.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Event rates were 124.0 PkPPM (any outcome), 21.2 PkPPM (psychiatric utilization), and 7.6 PkPPM (suicidality). Among the composite models, the model predicting suicidality had the highest AUC (0.916) followed by any psychiatric acute care visit (0.891) and all-cause ED visit (0.790). Event-specific models all achieved an AUC >0.87, with the highest AUC noted for partial-day hospitalization (AUC = 0.938). Select predictors of all three outcomes included younger age, Medicaid insurance, past psychiatric ED visits, past suicidal ideation, and alcohol use disorder diagnoses, among others.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Analytical models derived from clinically-relevant features identify individuals with MDD at risk for poor outcomes and can be a practical tool for health care organizations to divert high-risk populations into comprehensive care models.</p>","PeriodicalId":74592,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric research and clinical practice","volume":"4 4","pages":"102-112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/69/40/RCP2-4-102.PMC9757499.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric research and clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.prcp.20220011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To develop and validate algorithms to identify individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) at elevated risk for suicidality or for an acute care event.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis among adults with MDD diagnosed between January 1, 2018 and February 28, 2019. Generalized estimating equation models were developed to predict emergency department (ED) visit, inpatient hospitalization, acute care visit (ED or inpatient), partial-day hospitalization, and suicidality in the year following diagnosis. Outcomes (per 1000 patients per month, PkPPM) were categorized as all-cause, psychiatric, or MDD-specific and combined into composite measures. Predictors included demographics, medical and pharmacy utilization, social determinants of health, and comorbid diagnoses as well as features indicative of clinically relevant changes in psychiatric health. Models were trained on data from 1.7M individuals, with sensitivity, positive predictive value, and area-under-the-curve (AUC) derived from a validation dataset of 0.7M.

Results: Event rates were 124.0 PkPPM (any outcome), 21.2 PkPPM (psychiatric utilization), and 7.6 PkPPM (suicidality). Among the composite models, the model predicting suicidality had the highest AUC (0.916) followed by any psychiatric acute care visit (0.891) and all-cause ED visit (0.790). Event-specific models all achieved an AUC >0.87, with the highest AUC noted for partial-day hospitalization (AUC = 0.938). Select predictors of all three outcomes included younger age, Medicaid insurance, past psychiatric ED visits, past suicidal ideation, and alcohol use disorder diagnoses, among others.

Conclusions: Analytical models derived from clinically-relevant features identify individuals with MDD at risk for poor outcomes and can be a practical tool for health care organizations to divert high-risk populations into comprehensive care models.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

预测重度抑郁症患者的不良预后。
目的:开发并验证识别自杀或急性护理事件风险升高的重度抑郁症(MDD)个体的算法。方法:我们对2018年1月1日至2019年2月28日诊断为重度抑郁症的成年人进行了回顾性队列分析。建立了广义估计方程模型来预测诊断后一年的急诊科(ED)就诊、住院、急症室(ED或住院)、部分日间住院和自杀率。结果(每月每1000名患者,PkPPM)被归类为全因、精神病学或mdd特异性,并合并为复合测量。预测因素包括人口统计、医疗和药物使用、健康的社会决定因素、合并症诊断以及指示精神健康临床相关变化的特征。模型使用来自1.7M个体的数据进行训练,具有敏感性、正预测值和来自0.7M验证数据集的曲线下面积(AUC)。结果:事件发生率为124.0 PkPPM(任何结果),21.2 PkPPM(精神病学利用)和7.6 PkPPM(自杀)。综合模型中,预测自杀行为的模型AUC最高(0.916),其次是任何精神科急症就诊(0.891)和全因急症就诊(0.790)。事件特定模型的AUC均>0.87,部分住院天数模型的AUC最高(AUC = 0.938)。这三种结果的预测因素包括年龄更小、医疗保险、过去的精神科急诊科就诊、过去的自杀念头和酒精使用障碍诊断等。结论:从临床相关特征衍生的分析模型可以识别出有不良预后风险的重度抑郁症患者,并且可以成为卫生保健组织将高危人群转移到综合护理模型的实用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书