'I wouldn't know what to do with the breasts': the impact of patient gender on medical student confidence and comfort in clinical skills.

IF 1.5 Q3 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Marina Politis, Megan El Brown, Camille Am Huser, Lynsay Crawford, Lindsey Pope
{"title":"'I wouldn't know what to do with the breasts': the impact of patient gender on medical student confidence and comfort in clinical skills.","authors":"Marina Politis,&nbsp;Megan El Brown,&nbsp;Camille Am Huser,&nbsp;Lynsay Crawford,&nbsp;Lindsey Pope","doi":"10.1080/14739879.2022.2129460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous research has found a relationship between students' gender and attitudes surrounding peer physical examination, but relationship between patient gender and confidence/comfort is less clear. We explored whether patient gender affects medical students' levels of confidence and comfort in clinical examination skills.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic survey and focus groups were conducted with medical students from one UK institution. Students reported levels of confidence/comfort when carrying out clinical examinations on men/women. An inductive thematic analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of a total of 1500 students provided with the opportunity to participate, ninety (6%) responded. For cardiovascular and respiratory examinations, confidence/comfort were higher when examining male-presenting patients. The opposite was true for mental state examinations. Barriers to confidence/comfort included perceiving males as a norm, difficulty navigating breasts, tutors' internalised gendered attitudes and a wider sociocultural issue. Facilitators of confidence/comfort included students relating to patients, embodying a professional role, gender blindness, and authentic clinical environments. Fewer than 20% (n = 18) of students felt they had enough opportunity to practice clinical skills on women, versus 90% (n = 82) on men.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study identified an area where students' confidence and comfort in clinical examinations could be enhanced within medical education. Changes were implemented in the institution under study's vocational skills teaching, which is rooted in general practice. Information on gender and clinical skills was provided within course handbooks, time was scheduled to discuss gender and clinical skills in small group settings, and equitable gender representation was ensured in clinical assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":46436,"journal":{"name":"Education for Primary Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education for Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2022.2129460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Previous research has found a relationship between students' gender and attitudes surrounding peer physical examination, but relationship between patient gender and confidence/comfort is less clear. We explored whether patient gender affects medical students' levels of confidence and comfort in clinical examination skills.

Methods: An electronic survey and focus groups were conducted with medical students from one UK institution. Students reported levels of confidence/comfort when carrying out clinical examinations on men/women. An inductive thematic analysis was performed.

Results: Of a total of 1500 students provided with the opportunity to participate, ninety (6%) responded. For cardiovascular and respiratory examinations, confidence/comfort were higher when examining male-presenting patients. The opposite was true for mental state examinations. Barriers to confidence/comfort included perceiving males as a norm, difficulty navigating breasts, tutors' internalised gendered attitudes and a wider sociocultural issue. Facilitators of confidence/comfort included students relating to patients, embodying a professional role, gender blindness, and authentic clinical environments. Fewer than 20% (n = 18) of students felt they had enough opportunity to practice clinical skills on women, versus 90% (n = 82) on men.

Conclusion: Our study identified an area where students' confidence and comfort in clinical examinations could be enhanced within medical education. Changes were implemented in the institution under study's vocational skills teaching, which is rooted in general practice. Information on gender and clinical skills was provided within course handbooks, time was scheduled to discuss gender and clinical skills in small group settings, and equitable gender representation was ensured in clinical assessment.

“我不知道该拿乳房怎么办”:患者性别对医学生临床技能信心和舒适度的影响。
背景:已有研究发现学生性别与同伴体检态度之间存在关系,但患者性别与自信/舒适之间的关系尚不清楚。我们探讨患者性别是否影响医学生对临床检查技能的信心和舒适程度。方法:对英国一所院校的医学生进行电子调查和焦点小组调查。学生们报告了在对男性/女性进行临床检查时的信心/舒适程度。进行了归纳性专题分析。结果:在1500名有机会参与的学生中,有90名(6%)做出了回应。对于心血管和呼吸系统检查,当检查男性患者时,信心/舒适度更高。精神状态检查的情况正好相反。自信/舒适的障碍包括将男性视为一种常态,难以驾驭乳房,导师内心的性别态度以及更广泛的社会文化问题。自信/舒适的促进因素包括与患者相关的学生、专业角色的体现、性别盲和真实的临床环境。不到20% (n = 18)的学生认为他们有足够的机会在女性身上实践临床技能,而90% (n = 82)的学生认为他们有足够的机会在男性身上实践临床技能。结论:我们的研究确定了一个可以在医学教育中提高学生对临床检查的信心和舒适度的领域。在研究机构的职业技能教学中实施了一些变化,这些变化植根于全科实践。在课程手册中提供了关于性别和临床技能的资料,安排了时间在小组环境中讨论性别和临床技能,并确保在临床评估中有公平的性别代表性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Education for Primary Care
Education for Primary Care PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Education for Primary Care aims to reflect the best experience, expertise and innovative ideas in the development of undergraduate, postgraduate and continuing primary care education. The journal is UK based but welcomes contributions from all over the world. Readers will benefit from the broader perspectives on educational activities provided through the contributions of all health professionals, including general practitioners, nurses, midwives, health visitors, community nurses and managers. This sharing of experiences has the potential for enhancing healthcare delivery and for promoting interprofessional working.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信