COVID-19 recovery packages can benefit climate targets and clean energy jobs, but scale of impacts and optimal investment portfolios differ among major economies.

IF 15.1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Dirk-Jan van de Ven, Alexandros Nikas, Konstantinos Koasidis, Aikaterini Forouli, Gabriele Cassetti, Alessandro Chiodi, Maurizio Gargiulo, Sara Giarola, Alexandre C Köberle, Themistoklis Koutsellis, Shivika Mittal, Sigit Perdana, Marc Vielle, Georgios Xexakis, Haris Doukas, Ajay Gambhir
{"title":"COVID-19 recovery packages can benefit climate targets and clean energy jobs, but scale of impacts and optimal investment portfolios differ among major economies.","authors":"Dirk-Jan van de Ven,&nbsp;Alexandros Nikas,&nbsp;Konstantinos Koasidis,&nbsp;Aikaterini Forouli,&nbsp;Gabriele Cassetti,&nbsp;Alessandro Chiodi,&nbsp;Maurizio Gargiulo,&nbsp;Sara Giarola,&nbsp;Alexandre C Köberle,&nbsp;Themistoklis Koutsellis,&nbsp;Shivika Mittal,&nbsp;Sigit Perdana,&nbsp;Marc Vielle,&nbsp;Georgios Xexakis,&nbsp;Haris Doukas,&nbsp;Ajay Gambhir","doi":"10.1016/j.oneear.2022.08.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To meet the Paris temperature targets and recover from the effects of the pandemic, many countries have launched economic recovery plans, including specific elements to promote clean energy technologies and green jobs. However, how to successfully manage investment portfolios of green recovery packages to optimize both climate mitigation and employment benefits remains unclear. Here, we use three energy-economic models, combined with a portfolio analysis approach, to find optimal low-carbon technology subsidy combinations in six major emitting regions: Canada, China, the European Union (EU), India, Japan, and the United States (US). We find that, although numerical estimates differ given different model structures, results consistently show that a >50% investment in solar photovoltaics is more likely to enable CO<sub>2</sub> emissions reduction and green jobs, particularly in the EU and China. Our study illustrates the importance of strategically managing investment portfolios in recovery packages to enable optimal outcomes and foster a post-pandemic green economy.</p>","PeriodicalId":52366,"journal":{"name":"One Earth","volume":"5 9","pages":"1042-1054"},"PeriodicalIF":15.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9479429/pdf/","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"One Earth","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2022.08.008","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

To meet the Paris temperature targets and recover from the effects of the pandemic, many countries have launched economic recovery plans, including specific elements to promote clean energy technologies and green jobs. However, how to successfully manage investment portfolios of green recovery packages to optimize both climate mitigation and employment benefits remains unclear. Here, we use three energy-economic models, combined with a portfolio analysis approach, to find optimal low-carbon technology subsidy combinations in six major emitting regions: Canada, China, the European Union (EU), India, Japan, and the United States (US). We find that, although numerical estimates differ given different model structures, results consistently show that a >50% investment in solar photovoltaics is more likely to enable CO2 emissions reduction and green jobs, particularly in the EU and China. Our study illustrates the importance of strategically managing investment portfolios in recovery packages to enable optimal outcomes and foster a post-pandemic green economy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

2019冠状病毒病恢复计划可有利于气候目标和清洁能源就业,但影响的规模和最佳投资组合因主要经济体而异。
为实现《巴黎协定》的温度目标并从大流行的影响中恢复,许多国家启动了经济复苏计划,其中包括促进清洁能源技术和绿色就业的具体内容。然而,如何成功地管理绿色恢复一揽子计划的投资组合,以优化减缓气候变化和就业效益仍不清楚。本文采用三种能源经济模型,结合投资组合分析方法,在加拿大、中国、欧盟、印度、日本和美国六个主要排放地区寻找最优的低碳技术补贴组合。我们发现,尽管不同模型结构的数值估计不同,但结果一致表明,>50%的太阳能光伏投资更有可能实现二氧化碳减排和绿色就业,特别是在欧盟和中国。我们的研究说明了战略性地管理恢复一揽子计划中的投资组合的重要性,以实现最佳结果并促进大流行后的绿色经济。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
One Earth
One Earth Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.90%
发文量
159
期刊介绍: One Earth, Cell Press' flagship sustainability journal, serves as a platform for high-quality research and perspectives that contribute to a deeper understanding and resolution of contemporary sustainability challenges. With monthly thematic issues, the journal aims to bridge gaps between natural, social, and applied sciences, along with the humanities. One Earth fosters the cross-pollination of ideas, inspiring transformative research to address the complexities of sustainability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信