Arabic phoneme-grapheme correspondence by non-native, deaf children with cochlear implants and normal hearing children.

IF 1.4 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Farheen Naz Anis, Cila Umat, Kartini Ahmad, Badrulzaman Abdul Hamid
{"title":"Arabic phoneme-grapheme correspondence by non-native, deaf children with cochlear implants and normal hearing children.","authors":"Farheen Naz Anis,&nbsp;Cila Umat,&nbsp;Kartini Ahmad,&nbsp;Badrulzaman Abdul Hamid","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2022.2114583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare the error patterns of Arabic phoneme-grapheme correspondence by a group of Malay children with cochlear implants (CIs) and normal hearing (NH) and the effects of the visual graphical features of Arabic graphemes (no-dot, single-dot, and multiple-dots) on the phoneme-grapheme correspondence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were matched for hearing age (Mean, M = 7 ± 1.03 years) and duration of exposure to Arabic sounds (M = 2.7 ± 1.2 years). All 28 Arabic phonemes were presented through a loudspeaker and participants pointed to the graphemes associated with the presented phonemes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 336 and 616 tokens were collected for six children with CI and 11 NH children for each task, i.e., phonemes repetition and phoneme-grapheme correspondence. Both groups found it easier to repeat phonemes than the phoneme-grapheme correspondence. The children with CIs showed more confusion ([ظ, ز, ذ, ض, خ, ب, ه, س, ع, & ث] >10% correct scores) in phoneme-grapheme correspondence than the NH children ([ظ:14%] and [ث: 27%]). There was a significant interaction (<i>p</i> = 0.001) among the three visual graphical features and hearing status (CI and NH).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results infer that non-native Malay children with CIs and NH use different strategies to process the Arabic graphemes' visual features for phoneme-grapheme correspondence.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":"23 6","pages":"347-357"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2022.2114583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to compare the error patterns of Arabic phoneme-grapheme correspondence by a group of Malay children with cochlear implants (CIs) and normal hearing (NH) and the effects of the visual graphical features of Arabic graphemes (no-dot, single-dot, and multiple-dots) on the phoneme-grapheme correspondence.

Methods: Participants were matched for hearing age (Mean, M = 7 ± 1.03 years) and duration of exposure to Arabic sounds (M = 2.7 ± 1.2 years). All 28 Arabic phonemes were presented through a loudspeaker and participants pointed to the graphemes associated with the presented phonemes.

Results: A total of 336 and 616 tokens were collected for six children with CI and 11 NH children for each task, i.e., phonemes repetition and phoneme-grapheme correspondence. Both groups found it easier to repeat phonemes than the phoneme-grapheme correspondence. The children with CIs showed more confusion ([ظ, ز, ذ, ض, خ, ب, ه, س, ع, & ث] >10% correct scores) in phoneme-grapheme correspondence than the NH children ([ظ:14%] and [ث: 27%]). There was a significant interaction (p = 0.001) among the three visual graphical features and hearing status (CI and NH).

Conclusion: Our results infer that non-native Malay children with CIs and NH use different strategies to process the Arabic graphemes' visual features for phoneme-grapheme correspondence.

非母语聋儿、耳蜗植入儿童与正常听力儿童的阿拉伯语音素-字素对应关系。
目的:本研究旨在比较一组马来族耳蜗植入儿童(CIs)和听力正常儿童(NH)的阿拉伯语音素-字素对应的错误模式,以及阿拉伯语字素的视觉图形特征(无点、单点和多点)对音素-字素对应的影响。方法:根据听力年龄(平均,M = 7±1.03岁)和接触阿拉伯语声音的时间(M = 2.7±1.2岁)对参与者进行匹配。所有28个阿拉伯语音素都通过扬声器呈现,参与者指出与所呈现的音素相关的字素。结果:6名CI患儿和11名NH患儿在音素重复和音素-字素对应的任务中分别收集到336个和616个标记。两组人都发现重复音素比重复音素-字素的对应更容易。ci患儿在音素-字素对应方面比NH患儿表现出更多的混淆([,,,,,,,,,,]>10%的正确率)([:14%]和[:27%])。三个视觉图形特征与听力状况(CI和NH)之间存在显著的交互作用(p = 0.001)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,非马来语母语儿童的CIs和NH在处理阿拉伯语字素的视觉特征时使用了不同的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Cochlear Implants International was founded as an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal in response to the growing number of publications in the field of cochlear implants. It was designed to meet a need to include scientific contributions from all the disciplines that are represented in cochlear implant teams: audiology, medicine and surgery, speech therapy and speech pathology, psychology, hearing therapy, radiology, pathology, engineering and acoustics, teaching, and communication. The aim was to found a truly interdisciplinary journal, representing the full breadth of the field of cochlear implantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信