Narrative identity does not predict well-being when controlling for emotional valence.

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Tine B Gehrt, Niels Peter Nielsen, Rick H Hoyle, David C Rubin, Dorthe Berntsen
{"title":"Narrative identity does not predict well-being when controlling for emotional valence.","authors":"Tine B Gehrt,&nbsp;Niels Peter Nielsen,&nbsp;Rick H Hoyle,&nbsp;David C Rubin,&nbsp;Dorthe Berntsen","doi":"10.1080/09658211.2023.2218632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Narrative identity refers to a person's internalized and evolving life story. It is a rapidly growing research field, motivated by studies showing a unique association with well-being. Here we show that this association disappears when controlling for the emotional valence of the stories told and individuals' general experience of autobiographical memory. Participants (<i>N </i>= 235) wrote their life story and completed questionnaires on their general experience of autobiographical memory and several dimensions of well-being and affect. Participants' life stories were coded for standard narrative identity variables, including agency and communion. When controlling for emotional valence of the life story, the general experience of autobiographical memory was a significant predictor of most well-being measures, whereas agency was a predictor of one variable only and communion of none. These findings contradict the claim of an incremental association between narrative identity and well-being, and have important theoretical and practical implications for narrative identity as an outcome measure in interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":18569,"journal":{"name":"Memory","volume":"31 8","pages":"1051-1061"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memory","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2023.2218632","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Narrative identity refers to a person's internalized and evolving life story. It is a rapidly growing research field, motivated by studies showing a unique association with well-being. Here we show that this association disappears when controlling for the emotional valence of the stories told and individuals' general experience of autobiographical memory. Participants (N = 235) wrote their life story and completed questionnaires on their general experience of autobiographical memory and several dimensions of well-being and affect. Participants' life stories were coded for standard narrative identity variables, including agency and communion. When controlling for emotional valence of the life story, the general experience of autobiographical memory was a significant predictor of most well-being measures, whereas agency was a predictor of one variable only and communion of none. These findings contradict the claim of an incremental association between narrative identity and well-being, and have important theoretical and practical implications for narrative identity as an outcome measure in interventions.

在控制情绪效价的情况下,叙事认同不能预测幸福感。
叙事性身份是指一个人内化的、不断演变的人生故事。这是一个快速发展的研究领域,其动机是研究显示与幸福的独特联系。在这里,我们表明,当控制故事的情感效价和个人的自传体记忆的一般经验时,这种联系消失了。参与者(N = 235)写下他们的生活故事,并完成关于自传体记忆的一般体验以及幸福感和情感的几个维度的问卷调查。参与者的生活故事被编码为标准的叙事身份变量,包括代理和交流。当控制生活故事的情感效价时,自传式记忆的一般体验是大多数幸福测量的重要预测因子,而代理仅是一个变量的预测因子,没有交流。这些发现与叙事认同与幸福感之间的增量关联的说法相矛盾,并对叙事认同作为干预措施的结果测量具有重要的理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Memory
Memory PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: Memory publishes high quality papers in all areas of memory research. This includes experimental studies of memory (including laboratory-based research, everyday memory studies, and applied memory research), developmental, educational, neuropsychological, clinical and social research on memory. By representing all significant areas of memory research, the journal cuts across the traditional distinctions of psychological research. Memory therefore provides a unique venue for memory researchers to communicate their findings and ideas both to peers within their own research tradition in the study of memory, and also to the wider range of research communities with direct interest in human memory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信