Single Room Maternity Care Versus Traditional Maternity Care: A Cross-Sectional Study Examining Differences in Mothers' Perceptions of Readiness for Discharge and Satisfaction and Health Outcomes.

IF 1.7 Q2 NURSING
Marc Hall, Arfan Afzal, Deborah E White
{"title":"Single Room Maternity Care Versus Traditional Maternity Care: A Cross-Sectional Study Examining Differences in Mothers' Perceptions of Readiness for Discharge and Satisfaction and Health Outcomes.","authors":"Marc Hall,&nbsp;Arfan Afzal,&nbsp;Deborah E White","doi":"10.1177/08445621231165233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Single room maternity care (SRMC) includes all aspects of the birth process (labour, delivery, postpartum) in a single room with a consistent team of healthcare providers. Traditional maternity care (TMC) involves having mothers labouring and delivering their baby in one room and then transferring to a room on another unit, which also means a transition in providers. Although many hospitals have transitioned to SRMC, there has been limited evidence to support their development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted in two large hospitals (one offering SRMC, the other TMC) in Western Canada. A cross-sectional between-subjects design was used to compare differences between SRMC and TMC. New mothers were asked to complete validated questionnaires. Health information was collected from administrative and health databases. The main outcomes included readiness for hospital discharge, mothers' satisfaction, newborn length of stay, and mother length of stay. Several covariates were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 506 (292 SRMC; 214 TMC) mothers participated. Readiness for discharge and maternal satisfaction were significantly higher in SRMC. Although newborn and mother length of stay were significantly reduced in SRMC compared to TMC for univariate tests, mother length of stay was not significantly different when adjusting for other variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are positive health and psychosocial outcomes for mothers and newborns in the SRMC model of care compared to TMC. Since readiness for discharge and satisfaction are associated with positive maternal-infant interactions and transitions to community, SRMC could be the better approach. Further research should examine healthcare provider outcomes and implementation costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":46661,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Nursing Research","volume":"55 3","pages":"345-353"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10416552/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08445621231165233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Single room maternity care (SRMC) includes all aspects of the birth process (labour, delivery, postpartum) in a single room with a consistent team of healthcare providers. Traditional maternity care (TMC) involves having mothers labouring and delivering their baby in one room and then transferring to a room on another unit, which also means a transition in providers. Although many hospitals have transitioned to SRMC, there has been limited evidence to support their development.

Methods: This study was conducted in two large hospitals (one offering SRMC, the other TMC) in Western Canada. A cross-sectional between-subjects design was used to compare differences between SRMC and TMC. New mothers were asked to complete validated questionnaires. Health information was collected from administrative and health databases. The main outcomes included readiness for hospital discharge, mothers' satisfaction, newborn length of stay, and mother length of stay. Several covariates were examined.

Results: In total, 506 (292 SRMC; 214 TMC) mothers participated. Readiness for discharge and maternal satisfaction were significantly higher in SRMC. Although newborn and mother length of stay were significantly reduced in SRMC compared to TMC for univariate tests, mother length of stay was not significantly different when adjusting for other variables.

Conclusions: There are positive health and psychosocial outcomes for mothers and newborns in the SRMC model of care compared to TMC. Since readiness for discharge and satisfaction are associated with positive maternal-infant interactions and transitions to community, SRMC could be the better approach. Further research should examine healthcare provider outcomes and implementation costs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

单间产科护理与传统产科护理:一项横断面研究,调查母亲对出院准备程度、满意度和健康结果的看法差异。
背景:单间产科护理(SRMC)包括分娩过程的所有方面(分娩、分娩、产后),在一个单间内由一致的医疗保健提供者团队进行。传统的产妇护理(TMC)包括让母亲在一个房间分娩,然后转移到另一个病房的房间,这也意味着提供者的转变。尽管许多医院已经过渡到SRMC,但支持其发展的证据有限。方法:本研究在加拿大西部的两家大医院(一家提供SRMC,另一家提供TMC)进行。采用被试间横断面设计比较SRMC和TMC之间的差异。新妈妈们被要求完成有效的问卷调查。卫生信息是从行政和卫生数据库收集的。主要结果包括出院准备、母亲满意度、新生儿住院时间和母亲住院时间。检查了几个协变量。结果:共506例(292例SRMC;214名TMC母亲参与。出院准备度和产妇满意度在SRMC中显著更高。虽然在单变量测试中,新生儿和母亲的住院时间在SRMC中比在TMC中显著减少,但在调整其他变量时,母亲的住院时间没有显著差异。结论:与TMC相比,SRMC护理模式对母亲和新生儿的健康和心理社会有积极的影响。由于出院准备和满意度与积极的母婴互动和向社区的过渡有关,因此SRMC可能是更好的方法。进一步的研究应该检查医疗保健提供者的结果和实施成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: We are pleased to announce the launch of the CJNR digital archive, an online archive available through the McGill University Library, and hosted by the McGill University Library Digital Collections Program in perpetuity. This archive has been made possible through a Richard M. Tomlinson Digital Library Innovation and Access Award to the McGill School of Nursing. The Richard M. Tomlinson award recognizes the ongoing contribution and commitment the CJNR has made to the McGill School of Nursing, and to the development and nursing science in Canada and worldwide. We hope this archive proves to be an invaluable research tool for researchers in Nursing and other faculties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信