Ambulatory surgery for Moses™ holmium laser enucleation of the prostate A prospective, real-practice study from a single center.

Alexandre Morin, Stéphanie Boulet, Samuel Lagabrielle
{"title":"Ambulatory surgery for Moses™ holmium laser enucleation of the prostate A prospective, real-practice study from a single center.","authors":"Alexandre Morin,&nbsp;Stéphanie Boulet,&nbsp;Samuel Lagabrielle","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.8229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Use of ambulatory holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is uncommon among Canadian urologists. Our objectives were to determine the feasibility (ambulatory success rate) and safety (early complication rate) of ambulatory HoLEP in a Canadian population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively evaluated consecutive patients from June 2020 to May 2022 presenting for ambulatory HoLEP using Moses™ technology at our institution (MoLEP). Ambulatory success was defined as no hospital admission within 48 hours following the procedure. Thirty-day adverse events were also identified and graded according to the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification. All procedures were planned to be ambulatory regardless of prostate size or anticoagulant treatment. We generated a logistic regression model to identify factors associated with ambulatory failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 61 patients underwent MoLEP, 52 of whom met the eligibility criteria. The mean age was 71.0 years (standard deviation 6.2). Most patients (67%, 35/52) were catheter or self-catheterization-dependent. The ambulatory success rate was 87% (45/52); 6/52 (11.5%) required hospitalization following MoLEP and one patient (2%) was re-admitted within 48 hours of the procedure. Hematuria was the sole cause of ambulatory failure. Thirty-day major complication rate (CD ≥3) was 6% (3/52) and the minor complication rate (CD <3) was 37% (19/52). The identified adverse events included hematuria (10/52), urinary retention (6/52), and cystitis (4/52). Based on univariate analysis, we did not identify factors significantly associated with ambulatory failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MoLEP ambulatory success rate is high, and the 30-day major adverse event rate is low. In this small, Canadian cohort, ambulatory MoLEP seems feasible and safe.</p>","PeriodicalId":9574,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada","volume":"17 8","pages":"E228-E235"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10426413/pdf/cuaj-8-e228.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.8229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Use of ambulatory holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is uncommon among Canadian urologists. Our objectives were to determine the feasibility (ambulatory success rate) and safety (early complication rate) of ambulatory HoLEP in a Canadian population.

Methods: We prospectively evaluated consecutive patients from June 2020 to May 2022 presenting for ambulatory HoLEP using Moses™ technology at our institution (MoLEP). Ambulatory success was defined as no hospital admission within 48 hours following the procedure. Thirty-day adverse events were also identified and graded according to the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification. All procedures were planned to be ambulatory regardless of prostate size or anticoagulant treatment. We generated a logistic regression model to identify factors associated with ambulatory failure.

Results: A total of 61 patients underwent MoLEP, 52 of whom met the eligibility criteria. The mean age was 71.0 years (standard deviation 6.2). Most patients (67%, 35/52) were catheter or self-catheterization-dependent. The ambulatory success rate was 87% (45/52); 6/52 (11.5%) required hospitalization following MoLEP and one patient (2%) was re-admitted within 48 hours of the procedure. Hematuria was the sole cause of ambulatory failure. Thirty-day major complication rate (CD ≥3) was 6% (3/52) and the minor complication rate (CD <3) was 37% (19/52). The identified adverse events included hematuria (10/52), urinary retention (6/52), and cystitis (4/52). Based on univariate analysis, we did not identify factors significantly associated with ambulatory failure.

Conclusions: The MoLEP ambulatory success rate is high, and the 30-day major adverse event rate is low. In this small, Canadian cohort, ambulatory MoLEP seems feasible and safe.

Moses™钬激光前列腺去核的门诊手术一项来自单一中心的前瞻性、实践性研究。
简介:使用动态钬激光前列腺摘除(HoLEP)是不常见的在加拿大泌尿科医生。我们的目的是确定加拿大人群中动态HoLEP的可行性(动态成功率)和安全性(早期并发症率)。方法:我们前瞻性评估了从2020年6月到2022年5月在我们机构使用Moses™技术(MoLEP)进行门诊HoLEP的连续患者。门诊成功定义为手术后48小时内无住院。还根据Clavien-Dindo (CD)分类确定了30天的不良事件并进行了分级。无论前列腺大小或抗凝治疗如何,所有手术都计划在门诊进行。我们建立了一个逻辑回归模型来确定与动态衰竭相关的因素。结果:61例患者接受了MoLEP,其中52例符合入选标准。平均年龄71.0岁(标准差6.2)。大多数患者(67%,35/52)依赖于导管或自置管。门诊成功率为87% (45/52);6/52(11.5%)患者在MoLEP后需要住院,1名患者(2%)在手术后48小时内再次入院。血尿是门诊失败的唯一原因。30天主要并发症发生率(CD≥3)为6%(3/52),次要并发症发生率(CD)为6%(3/52)。结论:MoLEP的门诊成功率高,30天主要不良事件发生率低。在这个小型的加拿大队列中,动态MoLEP似乎是可行和安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信