"Therapy can be restorative, but can also be really harmful": Therapy experiences of QTBIPOC clients.

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Psychotherapy Pub Date : 2022-12-01 Epub Date: 2022-05-26 DOI:10.1037/pst0000443
Saumya Arora, Kirsten A Gonzalez, Roberto L Abreu, Christa Gloster
{"title":"\"Therapy can be restorative, but can also be really harmful\": Therapy experiences of QTBIPOC clients.","authors":"Saumya Arora, Kirsten A Gonzalez, Roberto L Abreu, Christa Gloster","doi":"10.1037/pst0000443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research suggests that queer and/or trans Black people, Indigenous people, and other People of Color (QTBIPOC) generally experience higher levels of psychological distress and depression, leading to poorer mental health outcomes (e.g., Lim & Hewitt, 2018; Sutter et al., 2018). However, little is known about the experiences of QTBIPOC individuals in therapy. The purpose of this grounded theory study was to understand the nuanced narratives of QTBIPOC individuals in therapy. Twelve QTBIPOC individuals were interviewed about their experiences in therapy, as well as their suggestions for how therapists can improve mental health treatment. Using minority stress and intersectional theories as frameworks, the following core category was identified: <i>An optimal therapy experience is contingent on the intentional dismantling of systemic oppression in therapy.</i> The six categories that comprise this core category included <i>therapy microskills encourage continued help-seeking despite cultural barriers, proximal stress leads to hesitation in the therapy room, ignorant therapist reactions exemplify distal stress, explicit validation of identity and experiences of oppression strengthens the therapeutic experience, shared identity facilitates the therapeutic bond, and therapy must be decolonized</i> and <i>center nontraditional healing practices</i>. Results of the present study suggest that therapy can be ineffective-or even harmful-for QTBIPOC individuals when systems of oppression are not adequately dismantled in the therapy room. Our findings prompt important directions for practice with QTBIPOC individuals as well as institutional advocacy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":"59 4","pages":"498-510"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000443","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research suggests that queer and/or trans Black people, Indigenous people, and other People of Color (QTBIPOC) generally experience higher levels of psychological distress and depression, leading to poorer mental health outcomes (e.g., Lim & Hewitt, 2018; Sutter et al., 2018). However, little is known about the experiences of QTBIPOC individuals in therapy. The purpose of this grounded theory study was to understand the nuanced narratives of QTBIPOC individuals in therapy. Twelve QTBIPOC individuals were interviewed about their experiences in therapy, as well as their suggestions for how therapists can improve mental health treatment. Using minority stress and intersectional theories as frameworks, the following core category was identified: An optimal therapy experience is contingent on the intentional dismantling of systemic oppression in therapy. The six categories that comprise this core category included therapy microskills encourage continued help-seeking despite cultural barriers, proximal stress leads to hesitation in the therapy room, ignorant therapist reactions exemplify distal stress, explicit validation of identity and experiences of oppression strengthens the therapeutic experience, shared identity facilitates the therapeutic bond, and therapy must be decolonized and center nontraditional healing practices. Results of the present study suggest that therapy can be ineffective-or even harmful-for QTBIPOC individuals when systems of oppression are not adequately dismantled in the therapy room. Our findings prompt important directions for practice with QTBIPOC individuals as well as institutional advocacy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

"治疗可以恢复,但也可能非常有害":QTBIPOC 客户的治疗经历。
研究表明,黑人、土著人和其他有色人种(QTBIPOC)中的同性恋和/或变性人通常会经历较高程度的心理困扰和抑郁,从而导致较差的心理健康结果(例如,Lim & Hewitt,2018;Sutter 等人,2018)。然而,人们对 QTBIPOC 在治疗中的经历知之甚少。本基础理论研究旨在了解 QTBIPOC 个人在治疗中的细微叙述。研究人员对 12 名 QTBIPOC 人士进行了访谈,了解他们在治疗中的经历,以及他们对治疗师如何改善心理健康治疗的建议。以少数群体压力和交叉理论为框架,确定了以下核心类别:最佳的治疗体验取决于在治疗中有意识地消除系统性压迫。构成这一核心类别的六个类别包括:治疗微技能鼓励人们克服文化障碍继续寻求帮助;近端压力导致治疗室中的犹豫不决;治疗师的无知反应体现了远端压力;对身份和受压迫经历的明确验证加强了治疗体验;共同的身份促进了治疗关系;治疗必须去殖民化并以非传统治疗实践为中心。本研究的结果表明,如果在治疗室中没有充分瓦解压迫系统,那么对于 QTBIPOC 个人来说,治疗可能是无效的,甚至是有害的。我们的研究结果为针对 QTBIPOC 个人的治疗实践以及机构宣传指明了重要方向。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychotherapy
Psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Psychotherapy Theory, Research, Practice, Training publishes a wide variety of articles relevant to the field of psychotherapy. The journal strives to foster interactions among individuals involved with training, practice theory, and research since all areas are essential to psychotherapy. This journal is an invaluable resource for practicing clinical and counseling psychologists, social workers, and mental health professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信