Flexible social inference facilitates targeted social learning when rewards are not observable

IF 21.4 1区 心理学 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Robert D. Hawkins, Andrew M. Berdahl, Alex ‘Sandy’ Pentland, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Noah D. Goodman, P. M. Krafft
{"title":"Flexible social inference facilitates targeted social learning when rewards are not observable","authors":"Robert D. Hawkins, Andrew M. Berdahl, Alex ‘Sandy’ Pentland, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Noah D. Goodman, P. M. Krafft","doi":"10.1038/s41562-023-01682-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Groups coordinate more effectively when individuals are able to learn from others’ successes. But acquiring such knowledge is not always easy, especially in real-world environments where success is hidden from public view. We suggest that social inference capacities may help bridge this gap, allowing individuals to update their beliefs about others’ underlying knowledge and success from observable trajectories of behaviour. We compared our social inference model against simpler heuristics in three studies of human behaviour in a collective-sensing task. Experiment 1 demonstrated that average performance improved as a function of group size at a rate greater than predicted by heuristic models. Experiment 2 introduced artificial agents to evaluate how individuals selectively rely on social information. Experiment 3 generalized these findings to a more complex reward landscape. Taken together, our findings provide insight into the relationship between individual social cognition and the flexibility of collective behaviour. Groups coordinate more effectively when individuals are able to learn from others’ successes. Hawkins et al. use a large-scale collective sensing paradigm to test how individual social inference abilities shape the emergent behaviour of human groups.","PeriodicalId":19074,"journal":{"name":"Nature Human Behaviour","volume":"7 10","pages":"1767-1776"},"PeriodicalIF":21.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Human Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-023-01682-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Groups coordinate more effectively when individuals are able to learn from others’ successes. But acquiring such knowledge is not always easy, especially in real-world environments where success is hidden from public view. We suggest that social inference capacities may help bridge this gap, allowing individuals to update their beliefs about others’ underlying knowledge and success from observable trajectories of behaviour. We compared our social inference model against simpler heuristics in three studies of human behaviour in a collective-sensing task. Experiment 1 demonstrated that average performance improved as a function of group size at a rate greater than predicted by heuristic models. Experiment 2 introduced artificial agents to evaluate how individuals selectively rely on social information. Experiment 3 generalized these findings to a more complex reward landscape. Taken together, our findings provide insight into the relationship between individual social cognition and the flexibility of collective behaviour. Groups coordinate more effectively when individuals are able to learn from others’ successes. Hawkins et al. use a large-scale collective sensing paradigm to test how individual social inference abilities shape the emergent behaviour of human groups.

Abstract Image

当无法观察到奖励时,灵活的社会推理有助于有针对性的社会学习。
当个人能够从他人的成功中学习时,团队会更有效地协调。但获得这些知识并不总是那么容易,尤其是在现实世界中,成功是隐藏在公众视野之外的。我们认为,社会推理能力可能有助于弥合这一差距,使个人能够根据可观察的行为轨迹更新他们对他人潜在知识和成功的信念。我们在集体感知任务中对人类行为的三项研究中,将我们的社会推理模型与更简单的启发式方法进行了比较。实验1表明,作为组大小的函数,平均性能以比启发式模型预测的更高的速率提高。实验2引入了人工智能体来评估个体如何选择性地依赖社会信息。实验3将这些发现推广到更复杂的奖励景观中。总之,我们的研究结果深入了解了个体社会认知与集体行为灵活性之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nature Human Behaviour
Nature Human Behaviour Psychology-Social Psychology
CiteScore
36.80
自引率
1.00%
发文量
227
期刊介绍: Nature Human Behaviour is a journal that focuses on publishing research of outstanding significance into any aspect of human behavior.The research can cover various areas such as psychological, biological, and social bases of human behavior.It also includes the study of origins, development, and disorders related to human behavior.The primary aim of the journal is to increase the visibility of research in the field and enhance its societal reach and impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信