Intraoperative and postoperative impact of pretransplantation transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts in orthotopic liver transplantations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 0.5 Q4 SURGERY
David Eugenio Hinojosa-Gonzalez, Eduardo Tellez-Garcia, Gustavo Salgado-Garza, Andres Roblesgil-Medrano, Luis Carlos Bueno-Gutierrez, Sergio Uriel Villegas-De Leon, Maria Alejandra Espadas-Conde, Francisco Eugenio Herrera-Carrillo, Eduardo Flores-Villalba
{"title":"Intraoperative and postoperative impact of pretransplantation transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts in orthotopic liver transplantations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"David Eugenio Hinojosa-Gonzalez,&nbsp;Eduardo Tellez-Garcia,&nbsp;Gustavo Salgado-Garza,&nbsp;Andres Roblesgil-Medrano,&nbsp;Luis Carlos Bueno-Gutierrez,&nbsp;Sergio Uriel Villegas-De Leon,&nbsp;Maria Alejandra Espadas-Conde,&nbsp;Francisco Eugenio Herrera-Carrillo,&nbsp;Eduardo Flores-Villalba","doi":"10.47717/turkjsurg.2022.5702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) remains the definitive treatment for patients afflicted with end-stage liver disease (ESLD). Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) have been adapted as a bridge to transplantation, allowing partial normalization of portal pressure and associated symptom improvement. Conflicting evidence exists on TIPS' impact on operative procedures. This study aimed to analyze available evidence on patients who underwent OLT with prior TIPS compared to OLT alone with the intent to determine TIPS' impact on surgical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted, identifying studies comparing TIPS + OLT versus OLT alone in patients with ESLD. Data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies were included. Operative time, packed red blood cells transfusions, intensive care unit admission, length of stay, dialysis, serum creatinine levels, ascites, vascular complications, bleeding revisions, reintervention, and other complications rates were similar between both groups. Fresh frozen plasma transfusion -2.88 units (-5.42, -0.35; p= 0.03), was lower in the TIPS + OLT group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study found TIPS can be safely employed without having detrimental impacts on OLT outcomes, furthermore, these findings also suggest TIPS does not increase bleeding or complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":23374,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Surgery","volume":"38 2","pages":"121-133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9714644/pdf/TJS-38-121.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47717/turkjsurg.2022.5702","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objectives: Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) remains the definitive treatment for patients afflicted with end-stage liver disease (ESLD). Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) have been adapted as a bridge to transplantation, allowing partial normalization of portal pressure and associated symptom improvement. Conflicting evidence exists on TIPS' impact on operative procedures. This study aimed to analyze available evidence on patients who underwent OLT with prior TIPS compared to OLT alone with the intent to determine TIPS' impact on surgical outcomes.

Material and methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted, identifying studies comparing TIPS + OLT versus OLT alone in patients with ESLD. Data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.3.

Results: Thirteen studies were included. Operative time, packed red blood cells transfusions, intensive care unit admission, length of stay, dialysis, serum creatinine levels, ascites, vascular complications, bleeding revisions, reintervention, and other complications rates were similar between both groups. Fresh frozen plasma transfusion -2.88 units (-5.42, -0.35; p= 0.03), was lower in the TIPS + OLT group.

Conclusion: Our study found TIPS can be safely employed without having detrimental impacts on OLT outcomes, furthermore, these findings also suggest TIPS does not increase bleeding or complications.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

移植前经颈静脉肝内门体分流术对原位肝移植术中和术后的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:原位肝移植(OLT)仍然是终末期肝病(ESLD)患者的最终治疗方法。经颈静脉肝内门静脉系统分流(TIPS)已被用作移植的桥梁,允许门静脉压力部分正常化和相关症状改善。关于TIPS对手术程序的影响存在相互矛盾的证据。本研究旨在分析与单纯OLT相比,接受OLT合并TIPS的患者的现有证据,以确定TIPS对手术结果的影响。材料和方法:遵循PRISMA指南,进行了系统评价,确定了比较TIPS + OLT与单独OLT治疗ESLD患者的研究。使用Review Manager 5.3分析数据。结果:纳入13项研究。两组患者的手术时间、充血红细胞输注、重症监护病房入住、住院时间、透析、血清肌酐水平、腹水、血管并发症、出血修复、再干预和其他并发症发生率相似。新鲜冷冻血浆输注-2.88单位(-5.42,-0.35;p= 0.03), TIPS + OLT组较低。结论:我们的研究发现TIPS可以安全地使用,不会对OLT结果产生不利影响,此外,这些发现还表明TIPS不会增加出血或并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信